Mideast Talks Held on WMD-Free Zone Prior to Ramadan Break

None

People cross a snow-covered road in Helsinki in February 2012. The Finnish capital could play host in September or December to a multinational conference on banning weapons of mass destruction from the Middle East.
National Journal
Elaine M. Grossman
July 11, 2014, 7:22 a.m.

Be­fore tak­ing a pause for Ra­madan, dip­lo­mats from the Middle East and sup­port­ing na­tions met in Geneva late last month to con­tin­ue talks on the pos­sib­il­ity of cre­at­ing a re­gion­al ban on weapons of mass de­struc­tion.

The June 24-25 dis­cus­sions between Is­rael, Egypt and oth­er Ar­ab coun­tries fo­cused on an agenda for a pro­posed sum­mit of na­tions in Hel­sinki, con­ceiv­ably to be held in Septem­ber or Decem­ber, ac­cord­ing to en­voys and ex­perts track­ing the pro­cess.

The month-long Muslim hol­i­day ends Ju­ly 28 but no date has been set yet for the next con­sulta­tions, sources tell Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire. Finnish dip­lo­mat Jaakko Laa­java is fa­cil­it­at­ing the dis­cus­sions, with the latest meet­ing in Switzer­land be­ing the fifth such mul­ti­lat­er­al con­sulta­tion since last Oc­to­ber.

In the in­form­al talks, Egypt and oth­er Ar­ab states have con­tin­ued to press Is­rael to join the Nuc­le­ar Non­pro­lif­er­a­tion Treaty as a non-weapons na­tion. Is­raeli dip­lo­mats have taken part in the WMD-free zone con­sulta­tions, but their gov­ern­ment has nev­er pub­licly ac­know­ledged the na­tion’s es­tim­ated stock­pile of 80 or more nuc­le­ar war­heads. Is­rael also has res­isted link­ing the idea of a re­gion­al WMD ban to the United Na­tions or non­pro­lif­er­a­tion treaty for­um.

In­stead, its en­voys have pushed for a WMD-free zone to equally em­phas­ize the elim­in­a­tion of bio­lo­gic­al and chem­ic­al weapons from the Middle East.

Neither Egypt nor Syr­ia has rat­i­fied the Bio­lo­gic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion, though each has signed it. For its part, Is­rael has neither signed nor rat­i­fied the BWC ac­cord. Egypt has not yet signed or rat­i­fied the 190-na­tion Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion.

Is­raeli dip­lo­mats ad­di­tion­ally are in­sist­ing that they would par­ti­cip­ate in a Hel­sinki con­fer­ence only if it is part of a broad­er ef­fort to es­tab­lish last­ing peace in the re­gion. To­ward that end, Is­rael wants to see Mideast na­tions ini­ti­ate con­fid­ence-build­ing meas­ures as a first step in cre­at­ing a WMD-free zone.

Is­rael’s Ar­ab in­ter­locutors have ac­cep­ted the idea “in prin­ciple” of dis­cuss­ing con­fid­ence-build­ing meas­ures, ac­cord­ing to Tariq Rauf of the Stock­holm In­ter­na­tion­al Peace Re­search In­sti­tute.

But Ar­ab en­voys say such trust-de­vel­op­ment meas­ures ““ which might ex­tend to list­ing or in­spect­ing con­ven­tion­al-cap­able de­liv­ery sys­tems — could be­come an un­ac­cept­able sub­sti­tute for the com­plete elim­in­a­tion of nuc­le­ar, bio­lo­gic­al and chem­ic­al arms from the Middle East.

“The good news is that they con­tin­ue to meet and dis­cuss the un­re­solved is­sues,” Chen Kane of the James Mar­tin Cen­ter for Non­pro­lif­er­a­tion Stud­ies said in a Wed­nes­day phone in­ter­view. “The bad news is that they have not man­aged to agree on those yet.”

Ad­di­tion­al “dif­fer­ences per­sist over con­tinu­ation of the con­sulta­tions and the format of fu­ture work­ing ses­sions,” Rauf said in a June brief­ing in Aus­tria.

Laa­java has pro­posed break­ing up the mul­tina­tion­al ses­sions — in which some 18 del­eg­a­tions sit around a large con­fer­ence table — in­to smal­ler work­ing groups, which Rauf said the fa­cil­it­at­or wants to meet “in a par­al­lel and bal­anced way.”

Three dif­fer­ent work­ing groups would be ded­ic­ated to: “prop­er­ties of a zone”; “veri­fic­a­tion and com­pli­ance is­sues”; and “re­gion­al se­cur­ity, con­ven­tion­al arms con­trol and con­fid­ence-build­ing meas­ures,” ac­cord­ing to Rauf’s brief­ing, de­livered at a Vi­enna con­fer­ence last month.

Thus far, though, it ap­pears that Ar­ab na­tions have not been able to agree on a way to im­ple­ment the work­ing group ap­proach that would al­low them to ef­fect­ively co­ordin­ate their na­tion­al po­s­i­tions, as they have in the past, ex­perts say.

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
20 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
15 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
×