Will Republicans Stand by the Benghazi ‘Stand-Down Order’ Conspiracy?

The most recent revelations from nine military officers should make it more difficult.

Chaffetz: A "definite maybe."
National Journal
Lucia Graves
July 11, 2014, 7:06 a.m.

One of the many threads in the tapestry of Benghazi con­spir­acy the­or­ies is the con­ten­tion that, faced with a ter­ror­ist at­tack on the U.S. Con­su­late there, the Amer­ic­an mil­it­ary didn’t do what it could have to save lives. Spe­cific­ally, that a “stand-down or­der” was is­sued from on high that pre­ven­ted the use of mil­it­ary as­sets that could have saved the four Amer­ic­ans who died the night of Sept. 11, 2012.

But hours of tran­scribed in­ter­views with nine mil­it­ary lead­ers, con­duc­ted by the House Armed Ser­vices and Over­sight and Gov­ern­ment Re­form com­mit­tees — and made pub­lic for the first time Wed­nes­day night — have yiel­ded some news. Namely, that this con­ten­tion ap­pears to be a bunch of hooey, ac­cord­ing to a close ex­am­in­a­tion by the As­so­ci­ated Press.

“The seni­or mil­it­ary of­ficer who is­sued the in­struc­tion to ‘re­main in place’ and the de­tach­ment lead­er who re­ceived it said it was the right de­cision and has been widely mis­char­ac­ter­ized,” the re­port found. (More de­tails about why that’s the case are laid out nicely in the AP’s re­port.)

The White House is pleased with the news, be­cause it backs up the view that the mil­it­ary’s de­cision to re­main in Tripoli and pro­tect Em­bassy per­son­nel there, rather than fly to Benghazi after all the Amer­ic­ans had already been evac­u­ated, made a whole lot of sense. What’s more, it makes GOP Rep. Dar­rell Issa, who has sug­ges­ted Hil­lary Clin­ton per­son­ally gave this al­leged con­spir­at­ori­al “stand-down or­der,” look par­tic­u­larly silly. (As sec­ret­ary of State at the time, Clin­ton wasn’t even in the chain of mil­it­ary com­mand.)

But it isn’t just Issa and pun­dits on Fox News who’ve bolstered this the­ory. It’s also been pro­moted by ser­i­ous-minded Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., chair­man of the some­what newly min­ted se­lect com­mit­tee in­vest­ig­at­ing Benghazi, along with the ma­jor­ity of Re­pub­lic­ans serving on it.

Rep. Jason Chaf­fetz of Utah, who has dis­cussed the “stand-down or­der” as if it were fact, is per­haps the most pro­nounced ex­ample of this. “We had prox­im­ity, we had cap­ab­il­ity, we had four in­di­vidu­als in Libya armed, ready to go, dressed, about to get in­to the car to go in the air­port to go help their fel­low coun­try­men who were dy­ing and be­ing killed and un­der at­tack in Benghazi, and they were told to stand down,” Chaf­fetz said over a year ago. “That’s as sick­en­ing and de­press­ing and dis­gust­ing as any­thing I have seen. That is not the Amer­ic­an way.”

Poli­ti­fact rated that claim as pat­ently false in May of 2013.

But it didn’t stop Gowdy, who has been praised by House Speak­er John Boehner for his “zeal for the truth,” from al­lud­ing, al­beit more cryptic­ally, to the same un­sup­por­ted points later that same month. “I think I’m asked about [Benghazi] be­cause it kind of in­volves what we be­lieve about our Re­pub­lic,” he ex­plained in an in­ter­view with the Daily Caller, “which is that we’re not gonna send any­body in­to harms way, un­der our flag without ad­equate pro­tec­tion, and if they get in trouble we are gonna go get ‘em. We’re gonna save ‘em. Or at least we’re gonna make a heck of an ef­fort to do it. So Benghazi kinda un­der­cuts that.”

And it didn’t stop Rep. Mike Pom­peo, R-Kan­sas, from sug­gest­ing to Hugh He­witt that the mil­it­ary “had the op­por­tun­ity” to take ac­tion, but didn’t. Nor did it dis­cour­age Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Peter Roskam of Illinois from sug­gest­ing in a press re­lease that the mil­it­ary was up to something fishy.

“We all want to be­lieve that our gov­ern­ment would do everything to come to the aid of Amer­ic­ans un­der threat abroad,” said Roskam, be­fore trans­ition­ing to why he couldn’t.

An­oth­er mem­ber of the Benghazi se­lect com­mit­tee, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, sug­ges­ted that dur­ing the at­tack, there was little ef­fort to fight back, ac­cord­ing to The Colum­bus Dis­patch. “Why wer­en’t we run­ning to the sound of the guns?” he asked.

Nev­er mind that a House Armed Ser­vices sub­com­mit­tee re­port from sev­er­al months earli­er had  found there was no way the U.S. mil­it­ary could have re­spon­ded in time to save the four Amer­ic­ans killed in Benghazi. GOP Rep. Martha Roby of Alabama still de­livered the sub­com­mit­tee’s re­port — which, by the way, also found that no “stand-down or­der” was is­sued — with a hint of con­spir­acy. “We did a very thor­ough job,” she told the Mont­gomery Ad­vert­iser, “but we did leave the door open when we said this was an in­ter­im re­port and that if in­form­a­tion sur­faced that there were oth­ers we needed to talk to, we would.”

Ask­ing wheth­er these new mil­it­ary testi­mon­ies (which largely just con­firm what’s been found pre­vi­ously) will change these Re­pub­lic­ans’ rhet­or­ic feels something akin to ask­ing what it takes to end a con­spir­acy the­ory. A bet­ter con­spir­acy, per­haps?

Cor­rec­tion: An earli­er ver­sion of this story mis­stated the state rep­res­en­ted by Mike Pom­peo. 

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
After Wikileaks Hack, DNC Staffers Stared Using ‘Snowden-Approved’ App
13 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The Signal app is fast becoming the new favorite among those who are obsessed with the security and untraceabilty of their messaging. Just ask the Democratic National Committee. Or Edward Snowden. As Vanity Fair reports, before news ever broke that the DNC's servers had been hacked, word went out among the organization that the word "Trump" should never be used in their emails, lest it attract hackers' attention. Not long after, all Trump-related messages, especially disparaging ones, would need to be encrypted via the Snowden-approved Signal.

Source:
WARRING FACTIONS?
Freedom Caucus Members May Bolt the RSC
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Republican Study Committee may lose several members of the House Freedom Caucus next year, "potentially creating a split between two influential groups of House conservatives." The Freedom Caucus was founded at the inception of the current Congress by members who felt that the conservative RSC had gotten too cozy with leadership, "and its roughly 40 members have long clashed with the RSC over what tactics to use when pushing for conservative legislation." As many as 20 members may not join the RSC for the new Congress next year.

Source:
SOME THERAPIES ALREADY IN TRIALS
FDA Approves Emergency Zika Test
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Monday issued emergency authorization for a Zika diagnostics test from Swiss drugmaker Roche, skirting normal approval channels as the regulator moves to fight the disease's spread." Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reports that a new study in Nature identifies "about a dozen substances" that could "suppress the pathogen's replication." Some of them are already in clinical trials.

Source:
MONEY HAS BEEN PAID BACK
Medicare Advantage Plans Overcharged Government
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

According to 37 newly released audits, "some private Medicare plans overcharged the government for the majority of elderly patients they treated." A number of Medicare Advantage plans overstated "the severity of medical conditions like diabetes and depression." The money has since been paid back, though some plans are appealing the federal audits.

Source:
DESPITE CONSERVATIVE OBJECTIONS
Omnibus Spending Bill Likely Getting a Lame-Duck Vote
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"GOP leaders and House Democrats are already laying the groundwork for a short-term continuing resolution" on the budget this fall "that will set up a vote on a catch-all spending bill right before the holidays." As usual, however, the House Freedom Caucus may throw a wrench in Speaker Paul Ryan's gears. The conservative bloc doesn't appear willing to accept any CR that doesn't fund the government into 2017.

Source:
×