Will Republicans Stand by the Benghazi ‘Stand-Down Order’ Conspiracy?

The most recent revelations from nine military officers should make it more difficult.

Chaffetz: A "definite maybe."
National Journal
Lucia Graves
July 11, 2014, 7:06 a.m.

One of the many threads in the tapestry of Benghazi con­spir­acy the­or­ies is the con­ten­tion that, faced with a ter­ror­ist at­tack on the U.S. Con­su­late there, the Amer­ic­an mil­it­ary didn’t do what it could have to save lives. Spe­cific­ally, that a “stand-down or­der” was is­sued from on high that pre­ven­ted the use of mil­it­ary as­sets that could have saved the four Amer­ic­ans who died the night of Sept. 11, 2012.

But hours of tran­scribed in­ter­views with nine mil­it­ary lead­ers, con­duc­ted by the House Armed Ser­vices and Over­sight and Gov­ern­ment Re­form com­mit­tees — and made pub­lic for the first time Wed­nes­day night — have yiel­ded some news. Namely, that this con­ten­tion ap­pears to be a bunch of hooey, ac­cord­ing to a close ex­am­in­a­tion by the As­so­ci­ated Press.

“The seni­or mil­it­ary of­ficer who is­sued the in­struc­tion to ‘re­main in place’ and the de­tach­ment lead­er who re­ceived it said it was the right de­cision and has been widely mis­char­ac­ter­ized,” the re­port found. (More de­tails about why that’s the case are laid out nicely in the AP’s re­port.)

The White House is pleased with the news, be­cause it backs up the view that the mil­it­ary’s de­cision to re­main in Tripoli and pro­tect Em­bassy per­son­nel there, rather than fly to Benghazi after all the Amer­ic­ans had already been evac­u­ated, made a whole lot of sense. What’s more, it makes GOP Rep. Dar­rell Issa, who has sug­ges­ted Hil­lary Clin­ton per­son­ally gave this al­leged con­spir­at­ori­al “stand-down or­der,” look par­tic­u­larly silly. (As sec­ret­ary of State at the time, Clin­ton wasn’t even in the chain of mil­it­ary com­mand.)

But it isn’t just Issa and pun­dits on Fox News who’ve bolstered this the­ory. It’s also been pro­moted by ser­i­ous-minded Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., chair­man of the some­what newly min­ted se­lect com­mit­tee in­vest­ig­at­ing Benghazi, along with the ma­jor­ity of Re­pub­lic­ans serving on it.

Rep. Jason Chaf­fetz of Utah, who has dis­cussed the “stand-down or­der” as if it were fact, is per­haps the most pro­nounced ex­ample of this. “We had prox­im­ity, we had cap­ab­il­ity, we had four in­di­vidu­als in Libya armed, ready to go, dressed, about to get in­to the car to go in the air­port to go help their fel­low coun­try­men who were dy­ing and be­ing killed and un­der at­tack in Benghazi, and they were told to stand down,” Chaf­fetz said over a year ago. “That’s as sick­en­ing and de­press­ing and dis­gust­ing as any­thing I have seen. That is not the Amer­ic­an way.”

Poli­ti­fact rated that claim as pat­ently false in May of 2013.

But it didn’t stop Gowdy, who has been praised by House Speak­er John Boehner for his “zeal for the truth,” from al­lud­ing, al­beit more cryptic­ally, to the same un­sup­por­ted points later that same month. “I think I’m asked about [Benghazi] be­cause it kind of in­volves what we be­lieve about our Re­pub­lic,” he ex­plained in an in­ter­view with the Daily Caller, “which is that we’re not gonna send any­body in­to harms way, un­der our flag without ad­equate pro­tec­tion, and if they get in trouble we are gonna go get ‘em. We’re gonna save ‘em. Or at least we’re gonna make a heck of an ef­fort to do it. So Benghazi kinda un­der­cuts that.”

And it didn’t stop Rep. Mike Pom­peo, R-Kan­sas, from sug­gest­ing to Hugh He­witt that the mil­it­ary “had the op­por­tun­ity” to take ac­tion, but didn’t. Nor did it dis­cour­age Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Peter Roskam of Illinois from sug­gest­ing in a press re­lease that the mil­it­ary was up to something fishy.

“We all want to be­lieve that our gov­ern­ment would do everything to come to the aid of Amer­ic­ans un­der threat abroad,” said Roskam, be­fore trans­ition­ing to why he couldn’t.

An­oth­er mem­ber of the Benghazi se­lect com­mit­tee, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, sug­ges­ted that dur­ing the at­tack, there was little ef­fort to fight back, ac­cord­ing to The Colum­bus Dis­patch. “Why wer­en’t we run­ning to the sound of the guns?” he asked.

Nev­er mind that a House Armed Ser­vices sub­com­mit­tee re­port from sev­er­al months earli­er had  found there was no way the U.S. mil­it­ary could have re­spon­ded in time to save the four Amer­ic­ans killed in Benghazi. GOP Rep. Martha Roby of Alabama still de­livered the sub­com­mit­tee’s re­port — which, by the way, also found that no “stand-down or­der” was is­sued — with a hint of con­spir­acy. “We did a very thor­ough job,” she told the Mont­gomery Ad­vert­iser, “but we did leave the door open when we said this was an in­ter­im re­port and that if in­form­a­tion sur­faced that there were oth­ers we needed to talk to, we would.”

Ask­ing wheth­er these new mil­it­ary testi­mon­ies (which largely just con­firm what’s been found pre­vi­ously) will change these Re­pub­lic­ans’ rhet­or­ic feels something akin to ask­ing what it takes to end a con­spir­acy the­ory. A bet­ter con­spir­acy, per­haps?

Cor­rec­tion: An earli­er ver­sion of this story mis­stated the state rep­res­en­ted by Mike Pom­peo. 

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×