How the U.S. Is Trying to Convince Central American Parents to Keep Their Kids Home

National Journal
Rachel Roubein
Add to Briefcase
Rachel Roubein
July 11, 2014, 1 a.m.

Perched on a rock, a boy wist­fully stares at the bleak, sprawl­ing waste­land be­fore him.

It’s an im­age plastered on a poster to be spread around El Sal­vador, Guatem­ala, and Hon­dur­as. There’s a mes­sage, writ­ten in the voice of a par­ent: “I thought it would be easy for my son to get his pa­pers in the North. That wasn’t true,” it says in Span­ish.

Law­makers are try­ing to fig­ure out just what ex­actly will stop par­ents from pay­ing thou­sands of dol­lars to smuggle their chil­dren in­to the United States, es­cap­ing pos­sible murder, rape, gang re­cruit­ment, and in­tens­i­fied vi­ol­ence in Cent­ral Amer­ica’s North­ern Tri­angle.

“I don’t think a moth­er in this coun­try ne­ces­sar­ily acts the same way as a moth­er in Hon­dur­as, Guatem­ala, or any oth­er place, be­cause their op­tions are so lim­ited,” Sen. Di­anne Fein­stein, D-Cal­if., said at a Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee hear­ing Thursday.

A num­ber of pro­pos­als have been floated to grapple with just what ex­actly should be done — and what might work to stop the in­flux of un­ac­com­pan­ied chil­dren from El Sal­vador, Guatem­ala, and Hon­dur­as from cross­ing the bor­der il­leg­ally. But there’s one fact the White House and many Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats can agree on: Par­ents need to know they shouldn’t send their chil­dren on an il­leg­al jour­ney in­to the United States.

Two Ari­zona Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors an­nounced Thursday that they plan to in­tro­duce le­gis­la­tion aimed at ad­dress­ing the “hu­man­it­ari­an crisis” at the bor­der.

And the bill, offered by Sens. John Mc­Cain and Jeff Flake, will send a sig­nal to par­ents: “The fed­er­al gov­ern­ment will only stem the flow of un­ac­com­pan­ied minors to the United States when their par­ents see us send­ing them right back,” Flake said in a state­ment. “This le­gis­la­tion gives the ad­min­is­tra­tion the flex­ib­il­ity it has re­ques­ted so it can be­gin to do just that.”

The sen­at­ors aim to en­cour­age par­ents in Cent­ral Amer­ica to ap­ply for refugee status in their home coun­try and avoid send­ing their chil­dren on jour­neys in­to the U.S. through Mex­ico. The bill provides some in­cent­ive in the form of 5,000 ad­di­tion­al refugee visas for each of the three coun­tries.

Ad­di­tion­ally, it calls for the ex­ped­ited re­mov­al of all un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants stopped at the bor­der to be com­pleted in a span of “hours or days,” drastic­ally de­creas­ing the cur­rent wait time of months to years, a press re­lease states.

There’s also already a mul­ti­mil­lion-dol­lar ad­vert­ising cam­paign un­der­way aimed at telling par­ents that send­ing chil­dren in­to the U.S. il­leg­ally is dan­ger­ous, and they shouldn’t ex­pect leg­al pa­pers to be is­sued upon their chil­dren’s ar­rival. U.S. Cus­toms and Bor­der Pro­tec­tion de­veloped the cam­paign, and Pres­id­ent Obama’s emer­gency sup­ple­ment­al fund­ing re­quest asks for an ad­di­tion­al $5 mil­lion for the mes­saging.

But some law­makers are skep­tic­al that this will ac­tu­ally in­flu­ence par­ents. Maybe wit­ness­ing planes re­turn chil­dren home would work bet­ter, they say.

“Isn’t the most ef­fect­ive de­terrent for young people leav­ing Cent­ral Amer­ica com­ing to our coun­try ac­tu­ally hav­ing the people in those coun­tries — Hon­dur­as, Guatem­ala, and El Sal­vador — see­ing those young people re­turned? Isn’t that the most ef­fect­ive de­terrent versus an ad­vert­ising cam­paign?” asked Sen. John Ho­even, R-North Dakota, dur­ing Thursday’s Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee hear­ing.

To which Home­land Se­cur­ity Sec­ret­ary Jeh John­son replied: “I agree that they need to see people com­ing back — that they wasted their money.”

But there are also oth­er ways to spread the word, John­son said, like he did on a re­cent trip to Guatem­ala.

“It was a rather awk­ward mo­ment, frankly, stand­ing next to the pres­id­ent of that coun­try, telling his cit­izens don’t come to our coun­try be­cause if you do, we will send you back, and it’s dan­ger­ous to do this,” he said. “But the pub­lic mes­saging is crit­ic­al.”

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
23 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
1 days ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
1 days ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×