Perched on a rock, a boy wistfully stares at the bleak, sprawling wasteland before him.
It’s an image plastered on a poster to be spread around El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. There’s a message, written in the voice of a parent: “I thought it would be easy for my son to get his papers in the North. That wasn’t true,” it says in Spanish.
Lawmakers are trying to figure out just what exactly will stop parents from paying thousands of dollars to smuggle their children into the United States, escaping possible murder, rape, gang recruitment, and intensified violence in Central America’s Northern Triangle.
“I don’t think a mother in this country necessarily acts the same way as a mother in Honduras, Guatemala, or any other place, because their options are so limited,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said at a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing Thursday.
A number of proposals have been floated to grapple with just what exactly should be done — and what might work to stop the influx of unaccompanied children from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras from crossing the border illegally. But there’s one fact the White House and many Republicans and Democrats can agree on: Parents need to know they shouldn’t send their children on an illegal journey into the United States.
Two Arizona Republican senators announced Thursday that they plan to introduce legislation aimed at addressing the “humanitarian crisis” at the border.
And the bill, offered by Sens. John McCain and Jeff Flake, will send a signal to parents: “The federal government will only stem the flow of unaccompanied minors to the United States when their parents see us sending them right back,” Flake said in a statement. “This legislation gives the administration the flexibility it has requested so it can begin to do just that.”
The senators aim to encourage parents in Central America to apply for refugee status in their home country and avoid sending their children on journeys into the U.S. through Mexico. The bill provides some incentive in the form of 5,000 additional refugee visas for each of the three countries.
Additionally, it calls for the expedited removal of all undocumented immigrants stopped at the border to be completed in a span of “hours or days,” drastically decreasing the current wait time of months to years, a press release states.
There’s also already a multimillion-dollar advertising campaign underway aimed at telling parents that sending children into the U.S. illegally is dangerous, and they shouldn’t expect legal papers to be issued upon their children’s arrival. U.S. Customs and Border Protection developed the campaign, and President Obama’s emergency supplemental funding request asks for an additional $5 million for the messaging.
But some lawmakers are skeptical that this will actually influence parents. Maybe witnessing planes return children home would work better, they say.
“Isn’t the most effective deterrent for young people leaving Central America coming to our country actually having the people in those countries — Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador — seeing those young people returned? Isn’t that the most effective deterrent versus an advertising campaign?” asked Sen. John Hoeven, R-North Dakota, during Thursday’s Senate Appropriations Committee hearing.
To which Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson replied: “I agree that they need to see people coming back — that they wasted their money.”
But there are also other ways to spread the word, Johnson said, like he did on a recent trip to Guatemala.
“It was a rather awkward moment, frankly, standing next to the president of that country, telling his citizens don’t come to our country because if you do, we will send you back, and it’s dangerous to do this,” he said. “But the public messaging is critical.”
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."