One Good Book

The Case for International Institutions

What if global powerhouse institutions actually did their jobs pretty well during the Great Recession?

National Journal
Nancy Cook
See more stories about...
Nancy Cook
July 11, 2014, 1 a.m.

What if glob­al power­house in­sti­tu­tions, which people love to hate in a knee-jerk way, ac­tu­ally did their jobs pretty well dur­ing the Great Re­ces­sion? That’s the premise of The Sys­tem Worked: How the World Stopped An­oth­er Great De­pres­sion (Ox­ford Uni­versity Press, 2014), a coun­ter­in­tu­it­ive book from Daniel Drezn­er, a pro­fess­or of in­ter­na­tion­al polit­ics at Tufts Uni­versity, as well as a pro­lif­ic tweeter and fre­quent con­trib­ut­or to The Wash­ing­ton Post.

While try­ing not to sound too Pol­ly­an­naish, Drezn­er makes the case that the G-20, the In­ter­na­tion­al Mon­et­ary Fund, the World Trade Or­gan­iz­a­tion, the Bank for In­ter­na­tion­al Set­tle­ments, and oth­er such groups helped to lessen the blow to the glob­al eco­nomy in­flic­ted by the worst U.S. fin­an­cial crisis since the Great De­pres­sion. They ac­com­plished this by co­ordin­at­ing policy, re­writ­ing rules, and en­sur­ing that trade re­mained strong even as mar­kets tanked throughout the de­veloped world. “Com­pared to sim­il­ar crises of this mag­nitude in the past, the world eco­nomy did not suf­fer as big of an eco­nom­ic hit, and growth re­sumed more quickly than ex­pec­ted,” Drezn­er writes in the open­ing chapter.

(Lorenzo Gritti)Spe­cific­ally, he ar­gues that glob­al in­sti­tu­tions re­acted quickly and staved off a worse fin­an­cial crisis by im­ple­ment­ing new bank­ing reg­u­la­tions, known as Basel III, to en­sure that banks kept more cash on hand. The IMF helped to nudge ne­go­ti­ations between cap­it­al im­port­ers and ex­port­ers to keep trade go­ing. The G-20 sup­planted the G-8 as the primary eco­nom­ic for­um, al­low­ing more coun­tries to par­ti­cip­ate in key in­ter­na­tion­al de­cisions. And the WTO, IMF, and Or­gan­iz­a­tion for Eco­nom­ic Co-op­er­a­tion and De­vel­op­ment jumped in and did a good job of mon­it­or­ing eco­nom­ic trends.

These achieve­ments, Drezn­er con­cludes, trump any break­downs in glob­al gov­ernance in the last few years, such as dis­agree­ments over fisc­al aus­ter­ity or the failed Doha trade talks (in­ter­na­tion­al ne­go­ti­ations that stalled when rich­er coun­tries dis­agreed with de­vel­op­ing ones, primar­ily over ag­ri­cul­tur­al sub­sidies). “Look­ing for per­fec­tion in glob­al gov­ernance is the en­emy of find­ing the good,” Drezn­er main­tains, giv­ing him­self some wiggle room in his ana­lys­is of how well the sys­tem worked.

That key caveat al­lows Drezn­er to draw his con­trari­an con­clu­sion that the glob­al gov­ernance sys­tem func­tioned post­crisis; it also lends the book less of a con­tro­ver­sial sweep than his thes­is first im­plies. It’s a bit like giv­ing props to Con­gress in 2013 when law­makers man­aged to pass a bill at the last minute to stave off massive tax hikes and spend­ing cuts. The bar is so low for co­oper­at­ive policy-mak­ing now, in­ter­na­tion­ally or do­mest­ic­ally, that any move­ment is cause for cel­eb­ra­tion. “The ques­tion is not wheth­er glob­al gov­ernance has been flaw­less, but wheth­er it has been good enough in sup­ply­ing the ne­ces­sary policies and pub­lic goods,” Drezn­er says.

With­in these nar­row para­met­ers, Drezn­er of­fers a thought­ful and con­tem­por­ary ana­lys­is of glob­al gov­ern­ing sys­tems and their un­der­ly­ing polit­ics. The book isn’t ex­actly a beach read, but it still con­tains im­port­ant takeaways for D.C. poli­cy­makers in today’s hy­per­crit­ic­al, hy­per-par­tis­an cli­mate. Drezn­er wants read­ers to ques­tion the con­ven­tion­al wis­dom that noth­ing works glob­ally or oth­er­wise. This “power­ful bi­as” to­ward neg­at­iv­ity, as Drezn­er calls it, can blind people to mo­ments of in­ter­na­tion­al suc­cess, such as the one that fol­lowed the Great Re­ces­sion. And a per­man­ent sense of pess­im­ism can feed in­to a false sense of nos­tal­gia for the good old days. Drezn­er’s point? Those golden days nev­er truly ex­is­ted, nor will they in the fu­ture — so why not cel­eb­rate the smal­ler vic­tor­ies and mo­ments of co­oper­a­tion?

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
15 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
×