Playing in Traffic Is Not Safe Politics

Are Democrats beginning to rationalize that losing the Senate majority wouldn’t be as bad as some fear?

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 16: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) (C), speaks to the media while flanked by U.S. Sen. Tom Udall (D-CO) (L) and U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), after attending the weekly Senate Democratic policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol July 16, 2013 in Washington, DC. Democrats gathered a the luncheon to discuss their agenda.
National Journal
Charlie Cook
July 7, 2014, 6:33 p.m.

While I have nev­er seen any­one lit­er­ally thrown un­der a bus, I would ima­gine it is quite a grisly sight. In polit­ics, we oc­ca­sion­ally see someone throw an in­di­vidu­al or a group on their own team un­der one. That is not a pretty sight either.

Early this year, we saw Sen­ate Demo­crats throw their House brethren un­der the pro­ver­bi­al bus with a Jan. 29 story in Politico head­lined, “Demo­crats: Cede the House to Save the Sen­ate.” It noted that Demo­crats’ hold on their ma­jor­ity in the up­per cham­ber was tenu­ous, while over on the House side, the Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee was rais­ing money hand over fist des­pite hav­ing little chance of re­claim­ing the ma­jor­ity House Demo­crats lost in 2010. It didn’t take a rock­et sci­ent­ist to fig­ure out that Sen­ate Demo­crats were try­ing to re­dir­ect fun­drais­ing from what they saw as a lost cause on one side of the Cap­it­ol to what they saw as a much more im­port­ant one on their side.

On one level, it was pretty ob­vi­ous that the odds were ex­ceed­ingly long for House Demo­crats and more like 50-50 — give or take 10 points — on the Sen­ate side. But these kinds of stor­ies are usu­ally played out in the weeks or fi­nal months be­fore an elec­tion, not in the first month of the elec­tion year. To me, it was both un­der­stand­able and un­seemly, and cer­tainly not very subtle. I could only won­der just how angry House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi was with the story, par­tic­u­larly giv­en that I had heard her de­liv­er a very spir­ited de­fense of Demo­crats’ House chances just a few weeks earli­er. But as the old say­ing goes, “Polit­ics ain’t bean­bag.”

We saw it again this past week with The Wash­ing­ton Post’s in­im­it­able Dana Mil­bank writ­ing a column Ju­ly 4 sug­gest­ing that per­haps the Obama pres­id­ency might be­ne­fit from Demo­crats los­ing their Sen­ate ma­jor­ity. The crunch­ing sound you heard was the bones of Sen­ate Demo­crats un­der a bus, a pretty fair in­dic­a­tion that someone in or close to the White House was be­gin­ning to ra­tion­al­ize why such an out­come might not be as bad a thing as some might think — all lo­gic to the con­trary.

Mil­bank ar­gues, “The pre­vail­ing view is that a Re­pub­lic­an Sen­ate would only com­pound [Pres­id­ent] Obama’s woes by bot­tling up con­firm­a­tions, doub­ling the num­ber of in­vest­ig­a­tions, and chip­ping away at Obama­care and oth­er le­gis­lat­ive achieve­ments.”

Now here comes the bus. Mil­bank con­tin­ues, “Yet there’s a chance that hav­ing an all-Re­pub­lic­an Con­gress would help Obama — and even some White House of­fi­cials have wondered privately wheth­er a uni­fied Re­pub­lic­an Con­gress would be bet­ter than the cur­rent en­vir­on­ment. Re­pub­lic­ans, without Harry Re­id to blame, would own Con­gress — a body that in­spires a high level of con­fid­ence in just 7 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans, ac­cord­ing to a Gal­lup sur­vey last month find­ing Con­gress at a new low and at the bot­tom of all in­sti­tu­tions tested.” Crunch.

All of this re­minds me of a lunch con­ver­sa­tion with a seni­or White House ad­viser just a few weeks be­fore the Demo­crats’ dis­astrous 2010 midterms, when they lost their House ma­jor­ity and saw their Sen­ate edge cut by more than half, los­ing six seats. The ad­viser ap­peared genu­inely dis­in­ter­ested in the midterm elec­tion, seem­ing to only want to talk about which Re­pub­lic­ans might ac­tu­ally jump in­to the 2012 con­test.

To be sure, Obama is run­ning around the coun­try do­ing fun­draisers for the Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee, as he does for oth­er party en­tit­ies. But a lot of the good­will built up by do­ing sev­en-di­git fun­drais­ing events is un­done by those in and close to the White House, whose loy­alty seems to be only to The Man and not the best in­terests of the party. Sure, if Re­pub­lic­ans “own” Con­gress, then the Obama White House will have a bet­ter angle of at­tack, but — and you can call me old-fash­ioned — it is nev­er a good thing to lose a Sen­ate or House ma­jor­ity.

That is not to say that Re­pub­lic­ans shouldn’t worry about the pos­sib­il­ity that if they hold the House (highly likely) and win a ma­jor­ity in the Sen­ate, that some of the more exot­ic GOP mem­bers would be em­boldened to do things that could be dis­astrous for their party. That should be a le­git­im­ate con­cern.

But for Obama, while yes, he would be re­cor­ded as the first Afric­an-Amer­ic­an pres­id­ent, he would also be re­membered for hav­ing lost a House ma­jor­ity in his first-term midterm elec­tion and the Sen­ate in his second term — a fairly in­aus­pi­cious re­cord, with the Af­ford­able Care Act cred­ited as hav­ing as­sisted in the play.

What We're Following See More »
HE ‘WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT’
Warren Goes After Trump Yet Again
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage. 

FIRST CHANGE IN FOUR DECADES
Congress Passes Chemical Regulations Overhaul
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The House on Tuesday voted 403-12 "to pass an overhaul to the nation’s chemical safety standards for the first time in four decades. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act aims to answer years of complaints that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks the necessary authority to oversee and control the thousands of chemicals being produced and sold in the United States. It also significantly clamps down on states’ authorities, in an effort to stop a nationwide patchwork of chemical laws that industry says is difficult to deal with."

Source:
LEVERAGE
Kasich Tells His Delegates to Remain Pledged to Him
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."

Source:
LOST BY HALF A PERCENTAGE POINT
Sanders Wants a Recount in Kentucky
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

Bernie Sanders "signed a letter Tuesday morning requesting a full and complete check and recanvass of the election results in Kentucky ... where he trails Hillary Clinton by less than one-half of 1 percent of the vote. The Sanders campaign said it has asked the Kentucky secretary of state to have election officials review electronic voting machines and absentee ballots from last week's primary in each of the state's 120 counties.

Source:
TIES TO CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE
McAuliffe Under Investigation for Fundraising
19 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) “is the subject of an ongoing investigation by the FBI and … the Justice Department” for potentially improper contributions to his 2013 campaign, including while he was a Clinton Global Initiative board member. ... Among the McAuliffe donations that drew the interest of the investigators was $120,000 from” former Chinese legislator Wang Wenliang. “U.S. election law prohibits foreign nationals from donating to … elections. … But Wang holds U.S. permanent resident status.”

Source:
×