Obamacare Allies Plan Next Steps for the Post-Hobby Lobby World

Women’s health organizations are responding to the Supreme Court decision with a focus on Congress and the midterms.

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 30: Supportes of employer-paid birth control rally in front of the Supreme Court before the decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores was announced June 30, 2014 in Washington, DC. The high court ruled 5-4 that requiring family-owned corporations to pay for insurance coverage for contraception under the Affordable Care Act violated a federal law protecting religious freedom. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
National Journal
Sophie Novack
Add to Briefcase
Sophie Novack
June 30, 2014, 8:45 a.m.

Fol­low­ing a string of Su­preme Court losses, the re­pro­duct­ive-rights move­ment and its le­gis­lat­ive al­lies are mak­ing plans they hope will help them to re­gain the lost ground.

Job one: Turn Court losses in­to cam­paign vic­tor­ies.

In Novem­ber’s midterm elec­tions, re­pro­duct­ive-rights or­gan­izers say they plan to make the Court’s Hobby Lobby de­cision a ma­jor is­sue in close elec­tions, call­ing it a win­ning is­sue for their can­did­ates.

Monday’s de­cision weakened the Af­ford­able Care Act’s man­date that had com­pelled em­ploy­ers to provide con­tra­cept­ive cov­er­age to their em­ploy­ees. A Re­u­ters/Ipsos poll out just be­fore the Su­preme Court de­cision found that 53 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans op­pose an em­ploy­er be­ing able to choose what types of con­tra­cep­tion to cov­er based on their re­li­gious be­liefs.

“This will be a main con­ver­sa­tion point in 2014,” said Ilyse Hogue, pres­id­ent of NARAL Pro-Choice Amer­ica. “We will con­tin­ue to work so that every voter in all these key races knows where their lead­er stands on this key is­sue — it’s part a mat­ter of health care, and part a mat­ter of trust.”

A spe­cif­ic cam­paign strategy is still be­ing ironed out. In the im­me­di­ate af­ter­math of the rul­ing, however, re­pro­duct­ive rights’ groups are protest­ing the de­cision — and prom­ising to at­tack the politi­cians who sup­port it.

“Today’s de­cision from five male justices is a dir­ect at­tack on wo­men and our fun­da­ment­al rights. This rul­ing goes out of its way to de­clare that dis­crim­in­a­tion against wo­men isn’t dis­crim­in­a­tion,” Hogue said. “We call upon Con­gress to right this wrong, and we will work tire­lessly with our al­lies and mem­ber act­iv­ists to make sure that the people who would stand between a wo­man and her doc­tor are held ac­count­able.”

Even be­fore the Novem­ber elec­tions, ad­voc­ates say they plan to work with Con­gress for a le­gis­lat­ive counter to the weak­en­ing of con­tra­cep­tion ac­cess dealt by the Court.

“We’ll be work­ing both with Con­gress, the ad­min­is­tra­tion, and state le­gis­latures to re­store wo­men’s be­ne­fits in every pos­sible way,” said Cecile Richards, Pres­id­ent of Planned Par­ent­hood.

Sen­ate Demo­crats are re­portedly plan­ning a re­sponse to the Hobby Lobby de­cision, with state­ments from top law­makers in­dic­at­ing a le­gis­lat­ive fix is already in the works.

“If the Su­preme Court will not pro­tect wo­men’s ac­cess to health care, then Demo­crats will,” said Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id. “We will con­tin­ue to fight to pre­serve wo­men’s ac­cess to con­tra­cept­ive cov­er­age and keep bosses out of the ex­am­in­a­tion room.”

“Since the Su­preme Court de­cided it will not pro­tect wo­men’s ac­cess to health care, I will,” said Sen. Patty Mur­ray. “In the com­ing days I will work with my col­leagues and the Ad­min­is­tra­tion to pro­tect this ac­cess, re­gard­less of who signs your paycheck.”

But without a dra­mat­ic shift of power in the House, Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship would have no trouble block­ing a bill aimed at de­fend­ing the ACA’s con­tra­cep­tion man­date.

The Su­preme Court on Monday sided with Hobby Lobby to weak­en that man­date. In a 5-4 de­cision writ­ten by Justice Samuel Alito, the Court said that closely held cor­por­a­tions — such as plaintiffs Hobby Lobby and Con­es­toga Wood — can­not be re­quired to provide con­tra­cep­tion to their em­ploy­ees if it vi­ol­ates their re­li­gious be­liefs.

The Hobby Lobby de­cision fol­lowed the Court’s un­an­im­ous de­cision Thursday to strike down a Mas­sachu­setts law re­quir­ing a 35-foot protest “buf­fer zone” around abor­tion clin­ics, to pro­tect the pub­lic and wo­men’s safety. The Court ruled that the re­stric­tion vi­ol­ated free speech.

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP CONTINUES TO LAWYER UP
Kasowitz Out, John Dowd In
1 days ago
THE LATEST

As the Russia investigation heats up, "the role of Marc E. Kasowitz, the president’s longtime New York lawyer, will be significantly reduced. Mr. Trump liked Mr. Kasowitz’s blunt, aggressive style, but he was not a natural fit in the delicate, politically charged criminal investigation. The veteran Washington defense lawyer John Dowd will take the lead in representing Mr. Trump for the Russia inquiry."

Source:
ALSO INQUIRES ABOUT PARDON POWER
Trump Looking to Discredit Mueller
1 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump's attorneys are "actively compiling a list of Mueller’s alleged potential conflicts of interest, which they say could serve as a way to stymie his work." They plan to argued that Mueller is going outside the scope of his investigation, in inquiring into Trump's finances. They're also playing small ball, highlighting "donations to Democrats by some of" Mueller's team, and "an allegation that Mueller and Trump National Golf Club in Northern Virginia had a dispute over membership fees when Mueller resigned as a member in 2011." Trump is said to be incensed that Mueller may see his tax returns, and has been asking about his power to pardon his family members.

Source:
INCLUDES NY PROBE INTO MANAFORT
Why Yes, Mueller Is Looking into Trump Businesses
1 days ago
THE LATEST

In addition to ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller's team is also "examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates, according to a person familiar with the probe. FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said. The investigation also has absorbed a money-laundering probe begun by federal prosecutors in New York into Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort."

Source:
Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team is "is examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates", including "Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008."

Source:
ANALYSIS FROM CBO
32 Million More Uninsured by 2026 if Obamacare Repealed
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"A Senate bill to gut Obamacare would increase the number of uninsured people by 32 million and double premiums on Obamacare's exchanges by 2026, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The analysis is of a bill that passed Congress in 2015 that would repeal Obamacare's taxes and some of the mandates. Republicans intend to leave Obamacare in place for two years while a replacement is crafted and implemented."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login