Forget the FCC — Should the FTC Enforce Net Neutrality?

Republicans argue existing antitrust laws can prevent abuse.

"Man Controlling Trade," by Michael Lantz, 1942; outside the Federal Trade Commission Building.
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Add to Briefcase
Brendan Sasso
June 20, 2014, 10:50 a.m.

The whole de­bate over net neut­ral­ity is fo­cus­ing on the wrong agency, ac­cord­ing to con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans.

The Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion — not the Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion — should po­lice ab­uses by In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders, the law­makers ar­gued dur­ing a House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee hear­ing Fri­day.

While the FCC has broad power to reg­u­late com­mu­nic­a­tions net­works, the FTC fo­cuses on ab­us­ive busi­ness prac­tices that harm com­pet­i­tion and con­sumers in all sec­tors.

Net neut­ral­ity is the prin­ciple that In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders shouldn’t ma­nip­u­late what con­sumers can ac­cess on­line. Ad­voc­ates fear that without gov­ern­ment rules, pro­viders like Com­cast could lim­it ac­cess to in­form­a­tion or cre­ate a two-tiered In­ter­net that be­ne­fits the largest cor­por­a­tions.

House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bob Good­latte, a Vir­gin­ia Re­pub­lic­an, said the gov­ern­ment shouldn’t stand by and al­low broad­band pro­viders to en­gage in an­ti­com­pet­it­ive be­ha­vi­or, but he warned that ri­gid net-neut­ral­ity reg­u­la­tions could stifle in­nov­a­tion.

“I be­lieve that vig­or­ous ap­plic­a­tion of the an­ti­trust laws can pre­vent dom­in­ant In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders from dis­crim­in­at­ing against com­pet­it­ors’ con­tent or en­ga­ging in an­ti­com­pet­it­ive pri­cing prac­tices,” Good­latte said dur­ing the hear­ing of the Sub­com­mit­tee on Reg­u­lat­ory Re­form, Com­mer­cial and An­ti­trust Law.

He ac­know­ledged that the an­ti­trust laws — which pro­hib­it busi­nesses from re­strain­ing com­pet­i­tion — may have to be up­dated so they can be “promptly and ef­fect­ively” ap­plied to the In­ter­net mar­ket­place.

Re­pub­lic­an FTC Com­mis­sion­er Joshua Wright agreed that his agency is up to the task. He ar­gued that an­ti­trust is a “su­per­i­or ana­lyt­ic­al frame­work” be­cause it re­lies on eco­nom­ic ana­lys­is to pro­tect con­sumer wel­fare.

But Demo­crats warned that an­ti­trust en­force­ment by the FTC is too nar­row to pre­vent the range of po­ten­tial ab­uses by In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders.

Rep. John Con­yers, the top Demo­crat on the Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee, said an­ti­trust can’t ad­dress noneco­nom­ic harms, such as re­stric­tions on free speech and polit­ic­al de­bate on the In­ter­net. He sug­ges­ted he could be open to the FTC tak­ing a lead­ing role on net neut­ral­ity if the agency re­lied on a broad in­ter­pret­a­tion of its power to com­bat “un­fair” busi­ness prac­tices — but he noted that Re­pub­lic­ans wouldn’t sup­port that ap­proach.

Tim Wu, a Columbia Uni­versity law pro­fess­or who coined the term “net neut­ral­ity,” also ar­gued that the FCC should con­tin­ue to take the lead on net-neut­ral­ity reg­u­la­tions.

“I have the highest ad­mir­a­tion for the an­ti­trust laws,” Wu test­i­fied. “But I simply don’t think they’re equipped to handle the broad range of val­ues and policies that are im­plic­ated by net neut­ral­ity and the open In­ter­net.”

He ar­gued that the gov­ern­ment must not only pro­tect com­pet­i­tion but also en­sure that In­ter­net pro­viders don’t block polit­ic­ally con­tro­ver­sial web­sites, loc­al news sources, or small blogs. Those val­ues wouldn’t be in­cluded in a tra­di­tion­al an­ti­trust ana­lys­is, he said.

But Rep. Dar­rell Issa, a Cali­for­nia Re­pub­lic­an, laid in­to Wu, claim­ing the law pro­fess­or was ad­voc­at­ing gov­ern­ment con­trol of on­line speech. Issa noted that the FCC already reg­u­lates of­fens­ive speech on broad­cast TV.

“This is the FCC’s role. They’re a reg­u­lat­ory policy en­tity that ac­tu­ally does lim­it free speech,” Issa said. Wu countered that net neut­ral­ity is the “ex­act op­pos­ite” be­cause it en­sures In­ter­net pro­viders don’t con­trol on­line speech.

The FCC en­acted net-neut­ral­ity reg­u­la­tions in 2010 that barred In­ter­net pro­viders from block­ing web­sites or “un­reas­on­ably” dis­crim­in­at­ing against any traffic. But Ve­r­i­zon sued, and the D.C. Cir­cuit Court of Ap­peals struck the rules down earli­er this year.

FCC Chair­man Tom Wheel­er is now try­ing to re­write the reg­u­la­tions in a way that can sur­vive fu­ture court chal­lenges. His pro­pos­al would still bar In­ter­net pro­viders from block­ing web­sites, but would al­low them to charge web­sites for faster ser­vice as long as the agree­ments are “com­mer­cially reas­on­able.” That change has promp­ted a massive blow­back from lib­er­als, who fear it could dis­tort the In­ter­net in fa­vor of com­pan­ies that can pay for the spe­cial “fast lanes.”

What We're Following See More »
DEMOCRATS STILL INSISTING ON DACA
Wednesday Meeting May Be Last Chance to Avoid Shutdown
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Chances of a government shutdown grew Monday as Republicans concluded that they would be unable to reach a long-term spending accord by the Friday deadline. GOP leaders are now turning to a short-term funding measure in hopes of keeping agencies open while talks continue, but Democratic leaders say they are unlikely to support any deal that does not protect young illegal immigrants. Aides to key negotiators from both parties planned to meet Tuesday in an effort to rekindle budget talks, setting up a Wednesday meeting of the leaders themselves. If they cannot agree, the government would shut down at midnight Friday for the first time since 2013."

Source:
SAYS HE CAN NO LONGER SERVE UNDER TRUMP
Amb. to Panama John Feeley Resigns
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

“'As a junior foreign service officer, I signed an oath to serve faithfully the president and his administration in an apolitical fashion, even when I might not agree with certain policies. My instructors made clear that if I believed I could not do that, I would be honor bound to resign. That time has come,' Feeley said, according to an excerpt of his resignation letter read to Reuters."

Source:
SPEAKS TO MEDIA IN WAKE OF TRUMP’S DENIAL
Durbin Confirms President’s Remarks
3 days ago
THE LATEST
WYDEN AND PAUL WANT CHANGES TO BILL
Senators Vow FISA Filibuster
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Sens. Ron Wyden and Rand Paul said they will oppose reauthorization of FISA's Section 702 unless the bill contains added "protections for Americans' privacy rights. The powers granted by Section 702 are only supposed to be used against foreigners on foreign soil. But an American's communications can get swept up in the NSA's surveillance dragnet if they communicate with people overseas." More robust privacy protections were voted down by the House this week when it approved the authorization, but without them, Paul and Wyden say they'll filibuster.

Source:
USED “TOUGH LANGUAGE”
Trump: I Didn’t Use a Vulgarity
3 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login