Pentagon-Sponsored Report: Civilian Nuclear Reactors at Risk of Attack

Douglas P. Guarino, Global Security Newswire
See more stories about...
Douglas P. Guarino, Global Security Newswire
Aug. 16, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — A new re­port com­mis­sioned by the Pentagon main­tains that nuc­le­ar fa­cil­it­ies run by private com­pan­ies and uni­versit­ies re­main vul­ner­able to a 9/11-style ter­ror­ist at­tack.

By con­trast, atom­ic sites op­er­ated by the De­fense and En­ergy De­part­ments are largely pro­tec­ted from the pos­sib­il­ity of such as­saults.

The re­port, is­sued by the Nuc­le­ar Pro­lif­er­a­tion Pre­ven­tion Pro­ject at the Uni­versity of Texas-Aus­tin, calls at­ten­tion to the reg­u­la­tions of the U.S. Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion, which li­censes ci­vil­ian nuc­le­ar re­act­ors. Alan Ku­per­man — one of two of au­thors of the doc­u­ment — said in a con­fer­ence call with re­port­ers on Thursday that the NRC rules cur­rently re­quire com­mer­cial re­act­ors to be able to de­fend them­selves against at­tack by a group of ap­prox­im­ately five or six ter­ror­ists.

This is nearly double the num­ber of hy­po­thet­ic­al at­tack­ers that com­mer­cial re­act­ors were re­quired to de­fend against pri­or to the Septem­ber 2001 at­tacks on New York and Wash­ing­ton, Ku­per­man noted. He ad­ded though, that it is still less than half of the 19 ter­ror­ists be­lieved to have dir­ectly car­ried out the World Trade Cen­ter and Pentagon at­tacks.

“We com­mend the up­grades, but our con­cern is they’re not enough,” said Ku­per­man, re­fer­ring to the abil­ity of the reg­u­la­tions to pro­tect against a worst case scen­ario.

Also of con­cern is that NRC rules do not re­quire man­agers of ex­ist­ing com­mer­cial re­act­ors to pro­tect the fa­cil­it­ies from at­tacks that might come from the air — as they did in 2001 — or by sea, Ku­per­man said.

Past at­tempts by watch­dog groups to per­suade the reg­u­lat­ory com­mis­sion to re­quire re­act­ors to pro­tect against such at­tacks have been met with in­dustry res­ist­ance and have proved largely un­suc­cess­ful. However, Ku­per­man sug­ges­ted that the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment could play a role in provid­ing such de­fenses dir­ectly, rather than by pla­cing the bur­den en­tirely on nuc­le­ar en­ergy util­it­ies.

In­dustry has bristled at some past ef­forts by the gov­ern­ment to provide this form of as­sist­ance, though, Ku­per­man said. His re­port cites an in­cid­ent in which the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment deemed the wa­ter in­take struc­ture at the Mill­stone nuc­le­ar power plant in Con­necti­c­ut to be a vul­ner­ab­il­ity and offered to provide pro­tect­ive bar­ri­ers for free. The privately run fa­cil­ity re­jec­ted the DHS of­fer, Ku­per­man said, not­ing that the bar­ri­ers might have ad­ded to the plant op­er­at­or’s main­ten­ance costs.

The Nuc­le­ar En­ergy In­sti­tute, which rep­res­ents the atom­ic power in­dustry, re­spon­ded to the re­port on Thursday with a blog post as­sert­ing that nuc­le­ar plants “are widely ac­know­ledged to be the best-de­fen­ded fa­cil­it­ies among the na­tion’s crit­ic­al in­fra­struc­ture.”

The nuc­le­ar sec­tor’s lob­by­ing arm ar­gued that the FBI and Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment share this po­s­i­tion, but provided only links to the fed­er­al en­tit­ies’ In­ter­net home pages rather than to spe­cif­ic gov­ern­ment re­ports sup­port­ing the claim.

“Ap­prox­im­ately 9,000 ex­tremely well-armed and highly trained se­cur­ity of­ficers de­fend the na­tion’s 62 nuc­le­ar power plant sites,” the NEI re­sponse ad­ded. “This is an in­crease of ap­prox­im­ately 60 per­cent in the size of nuc­le­ar plant se­cur­ity forces since 9/11.”

The in­dustry group said, however, that the type of at­tack that Ku­per­man’s re­port ad­dresses would con­sti­tute “an en­emy-of-the-state in­cur­sion with­in our coun­try,” for which it is not “the ob­lig­a­tion of any elec­tric util­ity to de­fend against.” This, in­stead, is a “job for the highest levels of fed­er­al na­tion­al se­cur­ity,” the group said.

What We're Following See More »
FEELING THE MIDWESTERN BERN
Sanders Upsets Clinton in Indiana
43 minutes ago
THE LATEST

Despite trailing Hillary Clinton by a significant margin, Bernie Sanders wasn't going the way of Ted Cruz tonight. The Vermont senator upset Clinton in Indiana, with MSNBC calling the race at 9pm. Sanders appears poised to win by a five- or six-point spread.

Source:
TRUMP IS PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE
Ted Cruz Bows Out, Effectively Ceding the Contest to Trump
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

And just like that, it's over. Ted Cruz will suspend his presidential campaign after losing badly to Donald Trump in Indiana tonight. "While Cruz had always hedged when asked whether he would quit if he lost Indiana; his campaign had laid a huge bet on the state." John Kasich's campaign has pledged to carry on. “From the beginning, I’ve said that I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory,” said Cruz. “Tonight, I’m sorry to say it appears that path has been foreclosed."

Source:
TAKES AT LEAST 45 DELEGATES
Trump Wins Indiana, All but Seals the Nomination
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Republican establishment's last remaining hope—a contested convention this summer—may have just ended in Indiana, as Donald Trump won a decisive victory over Ted Cruz. Nothing Cruz seemed to have in his corner seemed to help—not a presumptive VP pick in Carly Fiorina, not a midwestern state where he's done well in the past, and not the state's legions of conservatives. Though Trump "won't secure the 1,237 delegates he needs to formally claim the nomination until June, his Indiana triumph makes it almost impossible to stop him. Following his decisive wins in New York and other East Coast states, the Indiana victory could put Trump within 200 delegates of the magic number he needs to clinch the nomination." Cruz, meanwhile, "now faces the agonizing choice of whether to remain in the race, with his attempt to force the party into a contested convention in tatters, or to bow out and cede the party nomination to his political nemesis." The Associated Press, which called the race at 7pm, predicts Trump will win at least 45 delegates.

Source:
LOTS OF STRINGERS
Inside the AP’s Election Operation
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
THE QUESTION
What’s the Average Household Income of a Trump Voter?
6 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Seventy-two thousand dollars, according to FiveThirtyEight. That's higher than the national average, as well as the average Clinton or Sanders voter, but lower than the average Kasich voter.

Source:
×