The Chattanooga Miracle Leaves Out the Working Class

Companies like Amazon and Volkswagen have flocked to the city — but they offer seasonal, temporary, unsteady work.

Justin Smith, 37, looks through a stack of free suits at a job training program in Chattanooga.
National Journal
Nancy Cook
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Nancy Cook
Aug. 21, 2013, 10:28 a.m.

This art­icle is part of a weeklong Amer­ica 360 series on Chat­tanooga.

CHAT­TANOOGA, Tenn. — The suits in blue dry-clean­ing bags sat in heaps on the con­fer­ence room table — there for the tak­ing, provided the young men could un­earth ones that fit.

Justin Smith’s blazer fit well in the shoulders but fell 2 inches too short in the sleeves — not that it mattered too much to him. He wasn’t sure he would need to wear a jack­et to any job or even to in­ter­view as a truck driver. Driv­ing a big rig, fork­lift, or bus had be­come the 37-year-old’s most re­cent ca­reer plan; it was an idea born in a free job-train­ing pro­gram in down­town Chat­tanooga that also of­fers donated dress suits to its en­rollees.

Already, Smith had run through the gamut of loc­al em­ploy­ment op­tions for someone without a col­lege de­gree. In the late 1990s, he worked as a su­per­visor in at a yarn-dy­ing fact­ory, un­til it shipped those jobs to China. Then he worked at a DuPont plant, where he man­u­fac­tured nylon for bul­let­proof vests and earned as much as $22 per hour. For three years, he tried to make it as a small-busi­ness own­er by open­ing a re­tail store to sell mid­cen­tury mod­ern fur­niture, a pas­sion of his.

When the re­ces­sion forced Chat­tanoogans to pull back on spend­ing and his busi­ness stumbled, Smith found work at the newly opened Volk­swa­gen plant. He de­livered parts on the fact­ory floor for $13.50 an hour for a year, un­til he got laid off in May with hun­dreds of oth­er Volk­swa­gen em­ploy­ees, he says.

Now, Smith would be thrilled to earn $15 to $16 an hour, or the equi­val­ent of $33,000 an­nu­ally. That’s a huge comedown from the $65,000 he made one year in man­u­fac­tur­ing.

For him, Chat­tanooga isn’t primar­ily a tech hub or a city whose eco­nomy is on the up­swing. Smith just sees a dead-end. “If someone paid my mov­ing ex­penses, I would move now,” he says. His friend at the job-train­ing work­shop, 20-year-old Dylan Wade, in­ter­rupts. “I don’t want to be a truck driver, but it pays a lot. It’s not what I want. It’s what my wal­let wants,” Wade says. He’d prefer to work as a land­scaper or garden­er but doesn’t see op­por­tun­it­ies in that field.

Chat­tanooga gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials, eco­nom­ic-de­vel­op­ment gurus, and well-edu­cated loc­als are keen on the idea that the Chat­tanooga eco­nomy is at a turn­ing point thanks to its re­vital­ized down­town; its su­per-speed In­ter­net, one of the fast­est in the coun­try; and the city’s abil­ity to lure new com­pan­ies to the area, in­clud­ing Volk­swa­gen, Amazon, and a hand­ful of call cen­ters such as HomeServe USA or Con­vergys.

But this nar­rat­ive does not ring true to those liv­ing on the city’s lower eco­nom­ic rungs. For them, the past dec­ade has been marked by struggle and a de­cline in wages, with few­er steady, stable job pro­spects, and the on­go­ing loss of man­u­fac­tur­ing jobs. The un­em­ploy­ment rate in Chat­tanooga re­mains at 8.5 per­cent, com­pared with the na­tion­al rate of 7.4 per­cent. About 23 per­cent of Chat­tanooga res­id­ents live be­low the poverty line, ac­cord­ing to the most re­cent census fig­ures; statewide, the av­er­age is 17 per­cent.

An­ec­dot­ally, food-bank work­ers say they’re see­ing more and more fam­il­ies de­pend­ing on the food pan­tries. These are work­ing people, not des­ti­tute enough to qual­i­fy for fed­er­ally fun­ded food stamps but who non­ethe­less re­main hungry. “Be­fore the re­ces­sion, we used to see primar­ily dis­abled people who couldn’t work, or the un­em­ployed,” says Holly Ash­ley, a spokes­per­son for the Chat­tanooga Area Food Bank. “Now, we’re see­ing more people who are un­der­em­ployed.”

When those without col­lege de­grees do find work, they say there’s little job se­cur­ity, even at the new Volk­swa­gen or Amazon plants, ar­gu­ably two of the bright­est stars of the Chat­tanooga eco­nomy. Smith got laid off after one year at Volk­swa­gen. His friend, James Mas­sey, 21, worked a sea­son­al job at Amazon with no hope of it lead­ing to a full-time po­s­i­tion. Res­id­ents say that’s the way both plants hire most of their work­ers: through tem­por­ary agen­cies where people can be hired and fired based on the com­pan­ies’ sup­ply and de­mand.

“When busi­ness goes down, they lay off people. In peak sea­sons, they’ll hire 500 to 600 people and then lay most of them off later,” says Duane Parks, a 29-year-old Chat­tanooga nat­ive. “I want to have some sta­bil­ity in my ca­reer.”

This di­ver­gent Chat­tanooga eco­nomy — with its sep­ar­ate tracks for high-skilled versus low-skilled work­ers — is in­dic­at­ive of the na­tion­wide trend of a dis­ap­pear­ing middle class. From 1999 un­til 2011, the real me­di­an house­hold in­come in the United States dropped by 8.9 per­cent, ac­cord­ing to the Census Bur­eau. Data like this sup­port Smith, Wade, and Mas­sey’s view of the Chat­tanooga eco­nomy as lackluster, at least for them. Still, they’re try­ing to im­prove their lives by gain­ing new skills or ap­ply­ing for a wider ar­ray of jobs.

Mean­while, highly edu­cated work­ers see the Chat­tanooga eco­nomy as on the cusp of something big, a small-sized city full of op­por­tun­ity for those who are eager and am­bi­tious. “We want six-fig­ure jobs to come to Chat­tanooga,” says 30-year-old Jack Studer, an en­tre­pren­eur who re­turned here after work­ing at an in­vest­ment bank and soft­ware com­pany. “Frankly, those 2,000 or so jobs at Volk­swa­gen pay barely above the poverty line. That’s part of the old Chat­tanooga eco­nomy — where things were 10 years ago.”

But, Chat­tanooga’s “old” eco­nomy worked much bet­ter for those with less edu­ca­tion. It gave work­ers like Smith jobs that paid over $20 an hour. The new may­or, Andy Berke, says he wants to im­prove the edu­ca­tion­al sys­tem to give less-skilled work­ers more op­por­tun­it­ies. Yet there is no grand city plan to ac­com­plish that. Many of the city’s elite and eco­nom­ic-de­vel­op­ment of­fi­cials sug­gest that a know­ledge-based eco­nomy will cre­ate wealth, which will trickle down to a great­er swath of res­id­ents. So far, that has failed to hap­pen, even with a spurt of de­vel­op­ment that began in the early 1990s.

This eco­nom­ic di­vide re­mains one of Chat­tanooga’s biggest chal­lenges, ac­cord­ing a 2008 case study by the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion. Much of the growth of down­town and the en­su­ing de­vel­op­ment has not linked to or helped Chat­tanooga’s poorest neigh­bor­hoods, the re­port says.

“Chat­tanooga as a tech­no­logy hub? That is b.s.,” says Mas­sey at the job-train­ing work­shop. “There are not many tech jobs here.” For less-edu­cated, lower-skilled work­ers, it just seems that the city has few­er jobs over­all to of­fer them. “Chat­tanooga his­tor­ic­ally has been very fo­cused on man­u­fac­tur­ing,” says Dav­id Penn, an as­so­ci­ate pro­fess­or of eco­nom­ics at Middle Ten­ness­ee State Uni­versity. “It has made some gains in man­u­fac­tur­ing with the Volk­swa­gen plant, but it’s still down in man­u­fac­tur­ing jobs and still down in the total num­ber of jobs.”

Penn com­mends the city for try­ing to di­ver­si­fy its eco­nomy by en­cour­aging growth in tech com­pan­ies and man­u­fac­tur­ing, along­side more tra­di­tion­al com­pan­ies such as Chat­tanooga Bakery or the in­sur­ance com­pany Un­um. But many of Chat­tanooga’s res­id­ents are still wait­ing for that di­ver­si­fic­a­tion to trans­late in­to the good life for them.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
21 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
22 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
1 days ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×