Air Force Commander: Unit Failed ICBM Test by Tiny Margin

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Aug. 21, 2013, 8:02 a.m.

The head of an Air Force ICBM wing that last week failed a safety and se­cur­ity ex­am­in­a­tion said his team missed the stand­ard only by the barest of mar­gins — “a frac­tion of a decim­al point,” Mil­it­ary Times re­por­ted on Monday.

The 341st Mis­sile Wing at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana was giv­en a fail­ing grade for its per­form­ance in a single ex­er­cise that was part of a broad­er in­spec­tion. That fail­ing grade, though, af­fected the en­tire in­spec­tion. The 341st Mis­sile Wing over­sees one-third of the na­tion’s 450 Minute­man 3 ICBMs.

Wing com­mand­er Col. Rob Stan­ley would not dis­close which part of his unit was re­spons­ible for the failed ex­er­cise, say­ing this in­form­a­tion could be mis­used by ad­versar­ies.   “The thing that we were rated un­sat­is­fact­ory on, I have every con­fid­ence in the world if it were a real-world situ­ation, it would have been flaw­less, but our stand­ards are so geared to­ward per­fec­tion — as they should be — that in this sim­u­lated en­vir­on­ment that we have to put them through to test them, if they fall even slightly, we have to rate the whole thing as un­sat­is­fact­ory,” the col­on­el said in an in­ter­view.   Be­cause of the in­spec­tion fail­ure, a “very small num­ber of some very young folks” have lost their op­er­at­ing cer­ti­fic­a­tions and are now be­ing re­trained, Stan­ley said. The re­fresh­er course is an­ti­cip­ated to last sev­er­al days. None of the in­volved mil­it­ary per­son­nel will be pun­ished, the pub­lic­a­tion re­por­ted.   The Air Force in re­cent years has had a string of em­bar­rass­ing epis­odes in­volving slip-ups by air­men with roles in the nuc­le­ar-weapons mis­sion. The most re­cent in­spec­tion fail­ure adds to a pub­lic per­cep­tion prob­lem for the Air Force’s Glob­al Strike Com­mand, which was es­tab­lished in 2009 to im­prove the ser­vice’s man­age­ment of its nuc­le­ar-cap­able stra­tegic mis­siles and bombers.   “How can you build pub­lic trust with an in­spec­tion sys­tem where nuc­le­ar units con­tin­ue to fail?” Hans Kristensen, head of the Fed­er­a­tion of Amer­ic­an Sci­ent­ists’ Nuc­le­ar In­form­a­tion Pro­ject, said to Mil­it­ary Times over e-mail.   Earli­er this year, the 91st Mis­sile Wing at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota re­ceived a less-than-sat­is­fact­ory rat­ing when it was tested on its ICBM-launch op­er­a­tions   “The lead­er­ship should not con­note a mind­set that fail­ing an in­spec­tion is a good thing be­cause it re­veals things that should be fixed,” Kristensen said. “Units with re­spons­ib­il­ity for nuc­le­ar weapons should not fail in­spec­tions. Peri­od.”   In three months, of­fi­cials from Glob­al Strike Com­mand and the De­fense Threat Re­duc­tion Agency will re­as­sess the Air Force wing on those parts of the ex­am­in­a­tion that it failed.   “I wish they could come today,” Stan­ley said. “We’re ready for them, and our folks that came up short are ready to get up and fight and prove that they are much bet­ter than is be­ing por­trayed in the me­dia right now.”
What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
2 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×