Could Anger At the IRS Unite Democrats And the Tea Party?

What could bring reform advocates and tea partyers together? Anger at the IRS.

Tea Party supporters gather for a rally outside the IRS headquarter in Washington, May 21, 2013. A few dozen tea party activists and their supporters have gathered outside the IRS headquarters in Washington to protest extra scrutiny of their organizations.
National Journal
Patrick Reis
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Patrick Reis
Aug. 21, 2013, 8:31 a.m.

Rep. Chris Van Hol­len has a pro­pos­al he says can as­suage both the tea party’s con­cerns over IRS over­reach and pro­gress­ives’ fret­ting over the flood of an­onym­ous cam­paign cash un­leashed by the Su­preme Court’s Cit­izens United rul­ing.

His plan: Sue the IRS.

The Mary­land Demo­crat  an­nounced Wed­nes­day that he is su­ing the agency, as well as the Treas­ury De­part­ment, to de­mand a change in the way they eval­u­ate non­profits that pro­claim them­selves to be “so­cial-wel­fare” or­gan­iz­a­tions.

The IRS cur­rently al­lows such or­gan­iz­a­tions — a class of power play­ers known as “tax-ex­empt 501(c)4s,” whose ranks in­clude Karl Rove’s Cross­roads GPS and the Obama-aligned Pri­or­it­ies USA — to dabble in polit­ic­al ad­vocacy, so long as they keep such activ­it­ies sec­ond­ary to their gen­er­al char­it­able work.

But Van Hol­len says that such a “primary char­it­able, sec­ond­ar­ily polit­ic­al” ar­range­ment leaves open a loop­hole for overtly polit­ic­al or­gan­iz­a­tions to ex­ploit be­ne­fits in­ten­ded to be re­served for char­it­ies. Chief among those be­ne­fits is that 501(c)4s do not have to dis­close their donors, and so cor­por­a­tions, uni­ons, and oth­er groups can pour money in­to ad­vocacy ef­forts without fear­ing pub­lic back­lash, or in­deed any pub­lic scru­tiny at all.

Hop­ing to lift the cur­tain on polit­ic­al spend­ing, Van Hol­len wants the IRS to re­write its rules to re­quire 501(c)4s to en­gage ex­clus­ively in so­cial-wel­fare activ­it­ies, and keep out of polit­ic­al spend­ing en­tirely. If the groups want to get in­to polit­ics, they should re­gister un­der a dif­fer­ent non­profit clas­si­fic­a­tion — known as 527s — that would pro­tect the groups from tax­a­tion but re­quire them to dis­close all of their donors.

“You can spend the money, but the law does re­quire, as Con­gress in­ten­ded, that you [tell] the pub­lic where the money is com­ing from,” Van Hol­len said Wed­nes­day.

The fight over polit­ic­al spend­ing has taken on new ur­gency since 2010, when the Cit­izens United de­cision struck down cam­paign fin­ance laws that had pre­vi­ously checked out­side groups’ polit­ic­al spend­ing.

Out­side polit­ic­al spend­ing has ex­ploded since the de­cision, as have the num­ber of groups seek­ing 501(c)4 status. More than 3,200 groups sought the status in 2012, as op­posed to 1,735 in 2010.

Van Hol­len said that his primary goal in the suit was cam­paign fin­ance trans­par­ency, but he hoped that the suit’s an­cil­lary con­sequences could pull in al­lies from the op­pos­ite end of the polit­ic­al spec­trum.

Con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans have been out­raged over the IRS’s cam­paign fin­ance role since the agency ad­mit­ted earli­er this year that some of its em­ploy­ees had used cri­ter­ia that tar­geted tea-party groups seek­ing 501(c)4 status for closer scru­tiny.

Van Hol­len re­jec­ted Re­pub­lic­ans’ claim that the IRS was en­gaged in polit­ic­ally mo­tiv­ated at­tacks, echo­ing Demo­crats’ re­cent claims that lib­er­al groups were also in the agency’s crosshairs. But he said the prob­lem could be rendered moot by re­mov­ing the IRS’s ob­lig­a­tion to judge where groups stand along the blurred line between so­cial wel­fare and polit­ic­al ad­vocacy.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
3 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
3 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
5 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login