House GOP Plans Mega-Hearing on Climate Change

House subcommittee on Energy and Power Chairman Rep. Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., presides over a hearing on the "Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011, Wednesday, Feb. 9, 2011, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)  
National Journal
Amy Harder
Add to Briefcase
Amy Harder
Aug. 21, 2013, 3 p.m.

After vir­tu­ally ig­nor­ing the na­tion’s biggest en­vir­on­ment­al is­sue for years, Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers of the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee are plan­ning a ma­jor hear­ing on cli­mate change on Sept. 18 and are in­vit­ing lead­ers of 13 fed­er­al agen­cies to testi­fy. It will be the first time since Pres­id­ent Obama un­veiled his cli­mate ac­tion plan in June that ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials will testi­fy on Cap­it­ol Hill about the agenda.

En­ergy and Power Sub­com­mit­tee Chair­man Ed Whit­field, R-Ky., who will preside over the hear­ing, sent out let­ters Aug. 6 in­vit­ing testi­mony from lead­ers of the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency; the de­part­ments of Ag­ri­cul­ture, De­fense, En­ergy, Health and Hu­man Ser­vices, In­teri­or, State, and Trans­port­a­tion; the Na­tion­al Ocean­ic and At­mo­spher­ic Ad­min­is­tra­tion in the Com­merce De­part­ment; NASA; the U.S. Agency for In­ter­na­tion­al De­vel­op­ment; the Ex­port-Im­port Bank; and the White House Of­fice of Sci­ence and Tech­no­logy.

In the let­ters, Whit­field asks nine ques­tions about how each agency de­votes its time, money, and re­sources to cli­mate-change policies and re­quests each of­fi­cial to in­clude an­swers in his or her writ­ten testi­mony at the hear­ing. The sub­com­mit­tee had asked the agen­cies to re­spond by Wed­nes­day about who will testi­fy. By press time Wed­nes­day even­ing, only the De­fense De­part­ment had con­firmed it will provide a wit­ness, al­though a Pentagon spokes­per­son was not able to provide the name. The sub­com­mit­tee ex­pects to con­firm more wit­nesses in the com­ing days.

If it provides a wit­ness, EPA will likely be the star of the hear­ing. Ad­min­is­trat­or Gina Mc­Carthy had not con­firmed by Wed­nes­day even­ing wheth­er she or someone on her be­half would testi­fy. EPA reg­u­la­tions are the center­piece of Obama’s cli­mate plan, and by the time the hear­ing oc­curs in mid-Septem­ber, EPA should be just days away from an­noun­cing draft rules for con­trolling green­house-gas emis­sions from new power plants. When Obama an­nounced his cli­mate plan in June, he gave EPA a Sept. 20 dead­line to an­nounce these reg­u­la­tions, which will be re­pur­posed from ones the agency ini­tially pro­posed last year.

The hear­ing, en­titled “The Obama Ad­min­is­tra­tion’s Cli­mate Change Policies and Activ­it­ies,” will touch on the sci­ence un­der­pin­ning glob­al cli­mate change. A draft of a ma­jor United Na­tions re­port leaked to Re­u­ters earli­er this week showed that the pan­el of sci­entif­ic ex­perts writ­ing the U.N.’s In­ter­gov­ern­ment­al Pan­el on Cli­mate Change re­port is at least 95 per­cent cer­tain that hu­man activ­ity — primar­ily burn­ing of fossil fuels — is the biggest cause of glob­al warm­ing since the 1950s. The IP­CC is the primary guide coun­tries use when de­cid­ing how to con­front cli­mate change.

“The idea is to fo­cus it on the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s cli­mate-change policy; ob­vi­ously sci­ence is an in­teg­ral part of that,” said a Re­pub­lic­an com­mit­tee aide, who ad­ded that it will be “quite a pro­duc­tion” cov­er­ing a wide ar­ray of is­sues re­lated to cli­mate change.

Over the past two years, House En­ergy and Com­merce Chair­man Fred Up­ton, R-Mich., and Whit­field have ig­nored nu­mer­ous let­ters from En­ergy and Com­merce rank­ing mem­ber Henry Wax­man, D-Cal­if., and En­ergy and Power Sub­com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Bobby Rush, D-Ill., re­quest­ing a hear­ing on cli­mate change and the latest sci­ence sur­round­ing the is­sue. In the last Con­gress, the two Demo­crats sent 21 let­ters, ac­cord­ing to their count. Up­ton and Whit­field re­spon­ded to just one of those re­quests, in March of this year.

“We ab­so­lutely should hear from Ad­min­is­tra­tion wit­nesses about the threat of cli­mate change,” Wax­man said in a state­ment to Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily. “We also should be hear­ing from the na­tion’s lead­ing sci­ent­ists. Ever since the Re­pub­lic­ans took over, the Com­mit­tee has been AWOL on the biggest en­ergy is­sue fa­cing the na­tion. It’s an em­bar­rass­ing re­cord that needs to change.”

The agency heads the sub­com­mit­tee has re­ques­ted to testi­fy are: Mc­Carthy; En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz; HHS Sec­ret­ary Kath­leen Se­beli­us; Ag­ri­cul­ture Sec­ret­ary Tom Vil­sack; Trans­port­a­tion Sec­ret­ary An­thony Foxx; In­teri­or Sec­ret­ary Sally Jew­ell; De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel; Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry; USAID Ad­min­is­trat­or Rajiv Shah; Ex­port-Im­port Bank Chair­man and Pres­id­ent Fred Hoch­berg; White House Sci­ence and Tech­no­logy Dir­ect­or John Hold­ren; NOAA Ad­min­is­trat­or Kath­ryn Sul­li­van; and NASA Ad­min­is­trat­or Charles Bolden Jr.

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP CONTINUES TO LAWYER UP
Kasowitz Out, John Dowd In
1 days ago
THE LATEST

As the Russia investigation heats up, "the role of Marc E. Kasowitz, the president’s longtime New York lawyer, will be significantly reduced. Mr. Trump liked Mr. Kasowitz’s blunt, aggressive style, but he was not a natural fit in the delicate, politically charged criminal investigation. The veteran Washington defense lawyer John Dowd will take the lead in representing Mr. Trump for the Russia inquiry."

Source:
ALSO INQUIRES ABOUT PARDON POWER
Trump Looking to Discredit Mueller
1 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump's attorneys are "actively compiling a list of Mueller’s alleged potential conflicts of interest, which they say could serve as a way to stymie his work." They plan to argued that Mueller is going outside the scope of his investigation, in inquiring into Trump's finances. They're also playing small ball, highlighting "donations to Democrats by some of" Mueller's team, and "an allegation that Mueller and Trump National Golf Club in Northern Virginia had a dispute over membership fees when Mueller resigned as a member in 2011." Trump is said to be incensed that Mueller may see his tax returns, and has been asking about his power to pardon his family members.

Source:
INCLUDES NY PROBE INTO MANAFORT
Why Yes, Mueller Is Looking into Trump Businesses
1 days ago
THE LATEST

In addition to ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller's team is also "examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates, according to a person familiar with the probe. FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said. The investigation also has absorbed a money-laundering probe begun by federal prosecutors in New York into Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort."

Source:
Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team is "is examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates", including "Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008."

Source:
ANALYSIS FROM CBO
32 Million More Uninsured by 2026 if Obamacare Repealed
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"A Senate bill to gut Obamacare would increase the number of uninsured people by 32 million and double premiums on Obamacare's exchanges by 2026, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The analysis is of a bill that passed Congress in 2015 that would repeal Obamacare's taxes and some of the mandates. Republicans intend to leave Obamacare in place for two years while a replacement is crafted and implemented."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login