PEOPLE

Eleanor Holmes Norton: Living the Dream of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

None

From left, Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., Harry E. Johnson, President/CEO of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Foundation, and District of Columbia Mayor Vincent Gray, tour the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial in Washington, Wednesday, Aug. 10, 2011, after a news conference. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
National Journal
Mike Magner
See more stories about...
Mike Magner
Aug. 25, 2013, 8:30 a.m.

Since work­ing for the March on Wash­ing­ton 50 years ago, Del­eg­ate Elean­or Holmes Norton, D-D.C., has come a very long way — and not quite far enough. In many ways her ca­reer mir­rors the story of civil rights and race re­la­tions in Amer­ica.

Norton, 76, has gone from be­ing a law stu­dent and vo­lun­teer for the Stu­dent Non­vi­ol­ent Co­ordin­at­ing Com­mit­tee, to be­come a law clerk in fed­er­al court, a prac­ti­cing law­yer for the Amer­ic­an Civil Liber­ties Uni­on, a law pro­fess­or at New York Uni­versity, the head of the New York City Hu­man Rights Com­mis­sion, chair­wo­man of the Equal Em­ploy­ment Op­por­tun­ity Com­mis­sion, Urb­an In­sti­tute fel­low and Geor­getown Uni­versity Law Cen­ter pro­fess­or, to rep­res­ent­ing the Dis­trict of Columbia in Con­gress.

But, alas, as an elec­ted mem­ber of Con­gress since 1991, Norton has nev­er been able to vote on any le­gis­la­tion. Like the oth­er five del­eg­ates from U.S. ter­rit­or­ies such as Pu­erto Rico and Amer­ic­an Sam­oa, she is al­lowed to par­ti­cip­ate in de­bates and work on com­mit­tees, but has no vot­ing rights on the House floor.

Black Amer­ica over the past five dec­ades has gone from strug­gling for equal rights to fight­ing to main­tain those rights now guar­an­teed un­der laws en­acted in the years fol­low­ing the his­tor­ic 1963 march, most not­ably the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Work­places and schools have been in­teg­rated, and the first black pres­id­ent is in the White House, but the na­tion is far from liv­ing in ra­cial har­mony. Un­em­ploy­ment among Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans is twice as high as it is among whites, gun vi­ol­ence is dis­pro­por­tion­ately killing Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans, and vot­ing rights are sub­ject to leg­al and polit­ic­al chal­lenges across the land.

“Just as the first March on Wash­ing­ton, 50 years ago, was the dir­ect cause of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the first en­force­able civil-rights le­gis­la­tion since the Civil War, this month’s march must in­sist on tan­gible pro­gress equal to today’s im­port­ant un­fin­ished work for equal­ity and justice,” Norton said in a state­ment on the eve of Wed­nes­day’s an­niversary events.

In an in­ter­view last week, Norton re­flec­ted on life as a young wo­man in Wash­ing­ton in the years lead­ing up to the Aug. 28, 1963, march that drew more than 250,000 people to the Na­tion­al Mall.

“I was raised in se­greg­ated D.C., an auto­crat­ic­ally ruled city with no elec­ted of­fi­cials, and noth­ing was hap­pen­ing,” she said. “My gen­er­a­tion was really ready for the civil-rights move­ment. As a teen­ager, there wasn’t any move­ment.”

Act­iv­ism didn’t really be­gin un­til Decem­ber 1955, Norton said, “when Rosa Parks sat down and re­fused to get up” after board­ing a bus in Mont­gomery, Ala., and sit­ting in a sec­tion re­served for whites. Parks, a seam­stress at a de­part­ment store, was ar­res­ted, and with­in days blacks began boy­cot­ting the city’s trans­it sys­tem.

A third-gen­er­a­tion Wash­ing­to­ni­an, Norton gradu­ated from An­ti­och Col­lege in 1960 and went on to Yale Law School with the goal of be­com­ing a civil-rights law­yer. In the sum­mer of 1963, she went to Mis­sis­sippi with oth­er young work­ers for SNCC to help or­gan­ize voter-re­gis­tra­tion drives.

On June 11, 1963, the state field dir­ect­or for the NAACP, Medgar Evers, took Norton on a tour of Jack­son, Miss., try­ing to per­suade her to stay and work there as a civil-rights law­yer. Late that even­ing, Evers took Norton to the bus sta­tion to catch the last ride out of town. When he re­turned to his home not long after mid­night, Evers was shot in the back. He died an hour later.

Norton re­turned to Wash­ing­ton and went to work for the march sched­uled for late Au­gust. “One of my main jobs was help­ing people find trans­port­a­tion, so I knew how many were com­ing,” she said. “The av­er­age per­son couldn’t think about go­ing to the South [to work for the civil-rights move­ment], but they could come for a day to Wash­ing­ton, D.C.”

The day of the march was un­for­get­table, capped by the Rev. Mar­tin Luth­er King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech that be­came the ral­ly­ing cry for the move­ment. “When I heard the speech, I felt picked off the ground,” Norton said. “It was so co­lossal — the ul­ti­mate vis­ion­ary speech.”

King’s ad­dress lit­er­ally put the civil-rights move­ment in­to full mo­tion, Norton said. “There’s no ques­tion you can point to be­fore and after and count pro­gress,” she said. “That sem­in­al ef­fect, like the 1964 law, was very rare for marches.”

A vot­ing-rights law was the first pri­or­ity, and after that was ac­com­plished, the move­ment began fo­cus­ing on eco­nom­ic is­sues such as labor stand­ards for more oc­cu­pa­tions, in­clud­ing do­mest­ic work­ers, and a fair em­ploy­ment law, she said. “The de­mands went to the most ba­sic hu­man rights — the right to pub­lic ac­com­mod­a­tions, the right to get a job, and vot­ing,” she said.

As one vis­ible sign of the pro­gress, 14 years after the march, Pres­id­ent Carter ap­poin­ted Norton to head the EEOC; she served as chair­wo­man from June 6, 1977, to Feb. 21, 1981.

A dec­ade later, she began her ca­reer in Con­gress, and for 22 years Norton has kept the is­sue of D.C.’s dis­en­fran­chise­ment in the spot­light. But her goal of giv­ing the city’s 630,000 res­id­ents full vot­ing rep­res­ent­a­tion in Con­gress, like Mar­tin Luth­er King’s vis­ion for full equal­ity, re­mains a dream.

What We're Following See More »
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
2 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
1 days ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
IT’S ALL ABOUT SECOND PLACE
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.

Source:
×