What the Government Won’t Tell You About the ‘March on Washington’

And what does Louis Farrakhan have to do with it?

It can be difficult, and often dangerous, for government agencies to produce crowd estimates
National Journal
Patrick Reis
See more stories about...
Patrick Reis
Aug. 26, 2013, 8:30 a.m.

Want to know how many people at­ten­ded this week­end’s com­mem­or­a­tion of Mar­tin Luth­er King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech?

Don’t ask the Na­tion­al Park Ser­vice. Of­fi­cials there won’t tell you. In fact, they won’t even guess.

Con­gress has banned the ser­vice from pro­du­cing crowd-size es­tim­ates, hop­ing to spare the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment the con­tro­versy it en­countered fol­low­ing the Mil­lion Man March of the 1990s.

In 1995, Louis Far­rakhan and oth­er mem­bers of the Na­tion­al Afric­an Amer­ic­an Lead­er­ship Sum­mit en­deavored to bring 1 mil­lion people to the Na­tion­al Mall to bring at­ten­tion to prob­lems faced by black men.

Fol­low­ing the protest, the Park Ser­vice es­tim­ated the crowd at 400,000, less than half the num­ber the or­gan­izers had hoped for. In­censed, Far­rakhan ac­cused the gov­ern­ment of de­lib­er­ately low-balling its es­tim­ate to un­der­state the march’s im­port­ance, even­ing threat­en­ing to sue the Park Ser­vice over its es­tim­ate.

In a sub­sequent ap­pro­pri­ations bill, Con­gress banned the ser­vice from us­ing any funds to carry out crowd es­tim­ates, say­ing that or­gan­iz­a­tions should hire private firms to pro­duce crowd es­tim­ates.

There re­mains no con­sensus fig­ure on the size of the Mil­lion Man March, with some non­fed­er­al es­tim­ates back­ing the NPS fig­ure — which the ser­vice has not re­trac­ted — and oth­er es­tim­ates put­ting the num­ber closer to 900,000.

As for this week­end’s “I Have a Dream” com­mem­or­a­tion, most me­dia out­lets have stayed vague. The Wash­ing­ton Post and Na­tion­al Pub­lic Ra­dio went with “thou­sands” (Wash­ing­ton Post), while the As­so­ci­ated Press op­ted for “tens of thou­sands.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4400) }}

What We're Following See More »
WORDS AND PICTURES
White House Looks Back on bin Laden Mission
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
NO BATTLE OVER SEATTLE
SCOTUS Won’t Hear Appeal of Minimum-Wage Law
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a sweeping constitutional challenge to Seattle’s minimum wage law, in what could have been a test case for future legal attacks on similar measures across the country. In a one-line order, the justices declined to hear a case by the International Franchise Association and a group of Seattle franchisees, which had said in court papers that the city’s gradual wage increase to $15 discriminates against them in a way that violates the Constitution’s commerce clause."

Source:
DOWN TO THE WIRE
Sanders Looks to Right the Ship in Indiana
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

Hillary Clinton may have the Democratic nomination sewn up, but Bernie Sanders apparently isn't buying it. Buoyed by a poll showing them in a "virtual tie," Sanders is "holding three rallies on the final day before the state primary and hoping to pull off a win after a tough week of election losses and campaign layoffs." 

Source:
CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION IN JUNE
DC to Release Draft Constitution as Part of Statehood Push
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The New Columbia Statehood Commission—composed of five District leaders including Mayor Muriel Bowser, D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, and D.C.'s congressional delegation—voted today to publicly release a draft of a new constitution for an eventual state next Friday, at the Lincoln Cottage." It's the first step in a statehood push this year that will include a constitutional convention in June and a referendum in November.

Source:
ALZHEIMER’S OUTCRY
Will Ferrell Bails on Reagan Movie
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

Amid outcry by President Reagan's children, actor Will Ferrell has pulled out of a movie that makes light of Reagan's Alzheimer's disease. A spokesperson for Ferrell said, “The ‘Reagan’ script is one of a number of scripts that had been submitted to Will Ferrell which he had considered. While it is by no means an ‘Alzheimer’s comedy’ as has been suggested, Mr. Ferrell is not pursuing this project."

Source:
×