Big Mailers Bracing for Steep Rate-Hike Request From Postal Service

U. S. Postal Service letter carrier Terry Caldwell, of Topsham, Maine, background, delivers mail in Bath, Maine, Monday, Dec. 5, 2011. The Postal Service, which has been losing money for five years, announced Monday that it would close 252 out of 461 mail processing centers across the country starting next April. (AP Photo/Pat Wellenbach)
National Journal
Billy House
See more stories about...
Billy House
Aug. 27, 2013, 3:30 p.m.

A co­ali­tion of magazine, news­pa­per, print­ing, and dir­ect-mar­ket­ing groups warns that the U.S. Postal Ser­vice may de­cide next week to re­quest that postal rates be raised sig­ni­fic­antly — per­haps by as much as 10 per­cent — un­der the claim of “ex­i­gent” cir­cum­stances.

The Board of Gov­ernors for the Postal Ser­vice, which is bleed­ing money, con­tin­ues to ex­plore “the pos­sib­il­ity of fil­ing for price ad­just­ment later this year,” spokes­man Dave Parten­heimer said Tues­day.

But he said no fi­nal de­cision has been made.

However, the board is sched­uled to meet in a private tele­con­fer­ence Sept. 5 with the top­ic of “pri­cing” in­cluded on its agenda. Fear­ing the board plans to vote to re­quest an across-the-board rate in­crease that far ex­ceeds in­fla­tion, the Af­ford­able Mail Al­li­ance of more than 50 com­mer­cial or­gan­iz­a­tions that rep­res­ent news­pa­pers, magazines, and dir­ect mail­ers has launched a pree­mpt­ive lob­by­ing ef­fort.

“The Af­ford­able Mail Al­li­ance un­der­stands that the Board of Gov­ernors will be con­sid­er­ing a po­ten­tial ex­i­gency rate in­crease on your con­fer­ence call on Sept. 5,” de­clared let­ters by the group to the board’s chair­man, Mickey Barnett, and oth­er board mem­bers.

Not­with­stand­ing the Postal Ser­vice’s on­go­ing fin­an­cial pre­dic­a­ment, warns those let­ters, a sig­ni­fic­ant rate in­crease could be self-de­feat­ing to re­cov­er­ing postal fin­an­cial sta­bil­ity, caus­ing “severely ad­verse and likely ir­re­voc­able con­sequences for mail volume and rev­en­ue.”

Postal rate in­creases are capped at in­fla­tion, as meas­ured by the Con­sumer Price In­dex. That would mean an al­low­able in­crease of about 2 per­cent for late Janu­ary 2014 im­ple­ment­a­tion.

But a 2006 law also al­lows the Postal Ser­vice to seek a high­er rate in­crease bey­ond the CPI in in­stances of “ex­i­gent” cir­cum­stances. In craft­ing that lan­guage, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, has said she en­vi­sioned ex­treme cir­cum­stances, like ter­ror­ist at­tacks or nat­ur­al dis­asters.

Such re­quests are to be made to the Postal Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion, which has 90 days to act on them. In 2010, the Postal Ser­vice sub­mit­ted such a re­quest for an ex­i­gent rate in­crease of 5.6 per­cent — far more than the CPI cap — that would have brought in more than $3 bil­lion more an­nu­ally.

But the mail­ers fought that in­crease in court, and it was de­railed.

The Postal Ser­vice con­tin­ues to hem­or­rhage money — as much as $19 bil­lion since early 2012. And there are ex­pect­a­tions that ef­forts to use “ex­i­gent” cir­cum­stances as a basis for a sig­ni­fic­ant rate in­crease are be­ing re­kindled.

The high­er costs would hit every­one, in­clud­ing in­di­vidu­als who put a stamp on a piece of mail. However, the AMA’s let­ters spell out that the mail­ing in­dustry and its sup­pli­ers are re­spons­ible for $1.3 tril­lion in sales an­nu­ally, and nearly 8 mil­lion private-sec­tor jobs.

“This is not a solu­tion,” said Mary Bern­er, pres­id­ent and CEO of the As­so­ci­ation of Magazine Me­dia, in an in­ter­view.

Rather, she said it will in­stead pro­duce a “lose-lose situ­ation” for Postal Ser­vice con­sumers and the ser­vice it­self. Some magazines, she said, could end up abandon­ing mail use al­to­geth­er and con­cen­trate even more on di­git­al ef­forts, or even go out of busi­ness. A 10 per­cent in­crease would add about $300 bil­lion in costs to the in­dustry, she said.

Bern­er said her group is among those sup­port­ive of ef­forts in Con­gress to come up with “real re­forms” rather than what she says are such short-term ef­forts to ad­dress the Postal Ser­vice’s worsen­ing fin­an­cial situ­ation. However, she said that at­ten­tion and ef­fort will be di­ver­ted from those cur­rent le­gis­lat­ive ef­forts by the re­newed leg­al chal­lenges sure to be moun­ted if the Postal Ser­vice pur­sues an­oth­er “ex­i­gent’ in­crease.

In the House, the Over­sight and Gov­ern­ment Re­form Com­mit­tee already has passed along party lines its new ver­sion of a postal-re­form bill sponsored by Chair­man Dar­rell Issa, R-Cal­if. A bill also has been in­tro­duced by Sens. Tom Carp­er, D-Del., and Tom Coburn, R-Okla., the chair­man and rank­ing mem­ber, re­spect­ively, of the Sen­ate Home­land Se­cur­ity and Gov­ern­ment­al Af­fairs Com­mit­tee.

MOST READ
What We're Following See More »
“CLINTON MUST BECOME THE NEXT PRESIDENT”
Bernie Sanders Seeks to Unite the Party
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Instead of his usual stump speech, Bernie Sanders tonight threw his support behind Hillary Clinton, providing a clear contrast between Clinton and GOP nominee Donald Trump on the many issues he used to discuss in his campaign stump speeches. Sanders spoke glowingly about the presumptive Democratic nominee, lauding her work as first lady and as a strong advocate for women and the poor. “We need leadership in this country which will improve the lives of working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor,” he said. “Hillary Clinton will make a great president, and I am proud to stand with her tonight."

“MUST NEVER BE PRESIDENT”
Elizabeth Warren Goes After Donald Trump
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a stark contrast from Michelle Obama's uplifting speech, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke about the rigged system plaguing Americans before launching into a full-throated rebuke of GOP nominee Donald Trump. Trump is "a man who has never sacrificed anything for anyone," she claimed, before saying he "must never be president of the United States." She called him divisive and selfish, and said the American people won't accept his "hate-filled America." In addition to Trump, Warren went after the Republican Party as a whole. "To Republicans in Congress who said no, this November the American people are coming for you," she said.

FLOTUS OFFERS STRONG ENDORSEMENT OF CLINTON
Michelle Obama: “I Trust” Hillary Clinton
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"In this election, and every election, it's about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four or eight years of their lives," Michelle Obama said. "There is only one person who I trust with that responsibility … and that is our friend Hillary Clinton." In a personal and emotional speech, Michelle Obama spoke about the effect that angry oppositional rhetoric had on her children and how she chose to raise them. "When they go low, we go high," Obama said she told her children about dealing with bullies. Obama stayed mostly positive, but still offered a firm rebuke of Donald Trump, despite never once uttering his name. "The issues a president faces cannot be boiled down to 140 characters," she said.

SANDERS BACKER CONFRONTS STUBBORN SANDERS SUPPORTERS
Sarah Silverman to Bernie or Bust: “You’re Being Ridiculous”
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Many Bernie Sanders delegates have spent much of the first day of the Democratic National Convention resisting unity, booing at mentions of Hillary Clinton and often chanting "Bernie! Bernie!" Well, one of the most outspoken Bernie Sanders supporters just told them to take a seat. "To the Bernie-or-bust people: You're being ridiculous," said comedian Sarah Silverman in a brief appearance at the Convention, minutes after saying that she would proudly support Hillary Clinton for president.

‘INEXCUSABLE REMARKS’
DNC Formally Apologizes to Bernie Sanders
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Democratic National Committee issued a formal apology to Bernie Sanders today, after leaked emails showed staffers trying to sabotage his presidential bid. "On behalf of everyone at the DNC, we want to offer a deep and sincere apology to Senator Sanders, his supporters, and the entire Democratic Party for the inexcusable remarks made over email," DNC officials said in the statement. "These comments do not reflect the values of the DNC or our steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process. The DNC does not—and will not—tolerate disrespectful language exhibited toward our candidates."

Source:
×