What You Can and Can’t Read in Connecticut State Prisons

From “Game of Thrones” to the Koran, it’s not too easy to know what you can get away with.

National Journal
Matt Berman
See more stories about...
Matt Berman
Aug. 30, 2013, 5:10 a.m.

If you’re spend­ing your days in the Con­necti­c­ut pris­on sys­tem, you’re in some luck. As of this month, you’ll now be able to read the A Song of Ice and Fire books by George R.R. Mar­tin, made phe­nom­en­ally pop­u­lar by HBO’s Game of Thrones.

But it’s not quite that simple. A new list of ap­proved, banned, and “un­der con­sid­er­a­tion” pub­lic­a­tions from an Aug. 6 meet­ing of the Con­necti­c­ut Bur­eau of Cor­rec­tions’ Me­dia Re­view Board shows how dif­fi­cult it can be to get some read­ing done. And that goes well bey­ond Game of Thrones.

Not even all of A Song of Ice and Fire is safe. Ac­cord­ing to the bur­eau, the first book in the series, A Game of Thrones, was un­til re­cently banned for “safety and se­cur­ity” reas­ons. That book was lis­ted as barred fol­low­ing the Aug. 6 meet­ing, but Kar­en Mar­tucci, the bur­eau’s act­ing dir­ect­or of ex­tern­al af­fairs, told Na­tion­al Journ­al that the book has since been ap­proved fol­low­ing an ap­peal. We do, however, feel for the in­mate(s) who read A Clash of Kings or A Storm of Swords without first get­ting to read A Game of Thrones. That sounds be­wil­der­ing.

The most re­cent book in the series, A Dance with Dragons, doesn’t have a clear status, likely be­cause it has not yet been re­ques­ted by a pris­on­er, Mar­tucci tells Na­tion­al Journ­al

So what’s the lo­gic be­hind hold­ing up one book in a series full of sex, be­head­ings, and tor­ture? The bur­eau doesn’t make that totally clear. And a glance at oth­er banned items on the list doesn’t help to re­veal much un­der­ly­ing sense.

The Ju­ly 22, 2013 is­sue of The New York­er is cur­rently not al­lowed in­to Con­necti­c­ut state pris­ons. While no spe­cif­ic reas­on for the ban aside from “safety and se­cur­ity” is giv­en by the bur­eau, that magazine does con­tain a piece by Rachel Louise Snyder on do­mest­ic ab­use. The story’s lede: “Dorothy Gi­unta-Cot­ter knew that someday her hus­band, Wil­li­am, would kill her.”

But it’s not just ob­vi­ous vi­ol­ence. Nine is­sues of The Co­ali­tion for Pris­on­ers Rights were not al­lowed as of the Aug. 6 meet­ing. And, for some reas­on, Septem­ber’s Slam Magazine, with LeBron James on the cov­er, was barred for “safety and se­cur­ity.”

And there are three pages of the Aug. 5, 2013 is­sue of Time Magazine that the bur­eau asks to be re­moved be­fore the magazine is al­lowed in­to pris­on. 

The bur­eau, since June 2012, has banned por­no­graphy from its pris­ons. So some re­quests from the Aug. 6 meet­ing, like the Spring 2013 Phat Puffs and Smooth Girl #30, have a “sexu­ally ex­pli­cit” tag. But so does Au­gust’s GQ and a re­cent is­sue of New York magazine.

The most in­ter­est­ing pub­lic­a­tion that is some­what dif­fi­cult to ac­cess in Con­necti­c­ut pris­ons is one of the world’s old­est: the Kor­an. The Eng­lish trans­la­tion of the Kor­an by Ab­dul­lah Yusuf Ali was lis­ted as “un­der re­view” after the Aug. 6 meet­ing, but Mar­tucci tells Na­tion­al Journ­al that an­oth­er of Yusuf Ali’s texts, The Mean­ing of the Holy Qur’an, is now “the ver­sion [of the Kor­an] that is cur­rently al­lowed” in the state’s pris­ons.

Act­ing Dir­ect­or Mar­tucci says in an e-mail that the agency is “re­view­ing our cur­rent prac­tice sur­round­ing pub­lic­a­tion re­view and mak­ing changes, as ap­pro­pri­ate, to en­sure we have a sound policy.” An ad­viser to Gov. Dan­nel Mal­loy said that “the pro­cess has to be ad­jus­ted,” fol­low­ing a mini-scan­dal earli­er this month over the avail­ab­il­ity of Wally Lamb’s best-selling She’s Come Un­done in the state’s pris­ons (and at the York Cor­rec­tion­al In­sti­tu­tion in par­tic­u­lar).

Even with the free­ing of A Game of Thrones, it ap­pears that more work has to be done to en­sure that the state’s pris­on book-mon­it­or­ing pro­cess doesn’t just look like ar­bit­rary cen­sor­ship. 

What We're Following See More »
FRENCH IS A LAWYER, VETERAN
Kristol Recruiting National Review’s David French for Third-Party Run
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Two Republicans intimately familiar with Bill Kristol’s efforts to recruit an independent presidential candidate to challenge Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have told Bloomberg Politics that the person Kristol has in mind is David French -- whose name the editor of the Weekly Standard floated in the current issue of the magazine.

French is a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom. According to the website of National Review, where French is a staff writer, he is a constitutional lawyer, a recipient of the Bronze Star, and an author of several books who lives in Columbia, Tenn., with his wife Nancy and three children."

Source:
CALIFORNIA VOTES IN A WEEK
Jerry Brown Backs Clinton
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

California Gov. Jerry Brown endorsed Hillary Clinton today, calling her "the only path forward to win the presidency and stop the dangerous candidacy of Donald Trump." While praising Sen. Bernie Sanders' campaign, Brown said "Clinton’s lead is insurmountable and Democrats have shown – by millions of votes – that they want her as their nominee. ... This is no time for Democrats to keep fighting each other. The general election has already begun."

Source:
GLASS CEILING STILL HARD TO CRACK
Clinton Says Voters Still Hung Up on Gender
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a New York Magazine profile, Hillary Clinton said she still encounters misogyny at her own events: “‘I really admire you, I really like you, I just don’t know if I can vote for a woman to be president.’ I mean, they come to my events and then they say that to me.”

Source:
CHANGE WE CAN’T BELIEVE IN
Trump Vows Not to Change
13 hours ago
THE LATEST
Source:
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
4 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

×