Wednesday could be a very interesting day for House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster, R-Pa. He is taking a 30-mile ride in a car that drives itself. The route from suburban Cranberry, Pa., to Pittsburgh International Airport includes multiple intersections, low-speed single-lane roads, and high-speed highway traffic with complex traffic lights.
How is this possible? Through a driverless car being developed at Carnegie Mellon University. Shuster probably wants one, considering that he has to make the drive from Washington to his hometown of Hollidaysburg, Pa., at least once a week. (He says it’s two hours and 40 minutes with no traffic.)
But, of course, Shuster may rethink the whole driverless concept when he sees the giant “Emergency Stop” red button where the car radio should be. He shouldn’t worry, though. A “dulcet female voice” will tell him exactly what is going on, according to a description of the car from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
Shuster will be riding with Barry Schoch, Pennsylvania’s transportation secretary, to highlight the need to maintain innovation in transportation in the United States. That’s a noble goal for the transportation guru of Congress to express. But at the press conference afterward, expect most of the questions to go to the engineers who designed the car at the CMU-General Motors Autonomous Driving Collaborative Research Lab. Does it honk in traffic? Can it parallel park? When can I get one?
The current version is a 2011 Cadillac SRX equipped with four computers, multiple sensors, radars, lasers, and of course GPS. The engineers say 90 percent of all car accidents are caused by human error, such as distracted driving, sleepiness, or drunkenness. Don’t forget just plain stupidity. A car that drives itself, presumably, has nothing better to do than get you to your destination while you text your sweetie or put on your makeup.
Of course, it’s probably going to be 10 years or more before such vehicles are available commercially. But we can only dream.
There’s no word yet on whether Shuster will be in the driver’s seat or riding shotgun.
What We're Following See More »
Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."
In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."
President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.
The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"