Wednesday could be a very interesting day for House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster, R-Pa. He is taking a 30-mile ride in a car that drives itself. The route from suburban Cranberry, Pa., to Pittsburgh International Airport includes multiple intersections, low-speed single-lane roads, and high-speed highway traffic with complex traffic lights.
How is this possible? Through a driverless car being developed at Carnegie Mellon University. Shuster probably wants one, considering that he has to make the drive from Washington to his hometown of Hollidaysburg, Pa., at least once a week. (He says it’s two hours and 40 minutes with no traffic.)
But, of course, Shuster may rethink the whole driverless concept when he sees the giant “Emergency Stop” red button where the car radio should be. He shouldn’t worry, though. A “dulcet female voice” will tell him exactly what is going on, according to a description of the car from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
Shuster will be riding with Barry Schoch, Pennsylvania’s transportation secretary, to highlight the need to maintain innovation in transportation in the United States. That’s a noble goal for the transportation guru of Congress to express. But at the press conference afterward, expect most of the questions to go to the engineers who designed the car at the CMU-General Motors Autonomous Driving Collaborative Research Lab. Does it honk in traffic? Can it parallel park? When can I get one?
The current version is a 2011 Cadillac SRX equipped with four computers, multiple sensors, radars, lasers, and of course GPS. The engineers say 90 percent of all car accidents are caused by human error, such as distracted driving, sleepiness, or drunkenness. Don’t forget just plain stupidity. A car that drives itself, presumably, has nothing better to do than get you to your destination while you text your sweetie or put on your makeup.
Of course, it’s probably going to be 10 years or more before such vehicles are available commercially. But we can only dream.
There’s no word yet on whether Shuster will be in the driver’s seat or riding shotgun.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."