The Chairman Has No Driver!

House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster plans to take a spin in futuristic vehicle.

Rep. Bill Shuster, R-Pa.
National Journal
Fawn Johnson
See more stories about...
Fawn Johnson
Sept. 2, 2013, 8:12 a.m.

Wed­nes­day could be a very in­ter­est­ing day for House Trans­port­a­tion and In­fra­struc­ture Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bill Shuster, R-Pa. He is tak­ing a 30-mile ride in a car that drives it­self. The route from sub­urb­an Cran­berry, Pa., to Pitt­s­burgh In­ter­na­tion­al Air­port in­cludes mul­tiple in­ter­sec­tions, low-speed single-lane roads, and high-speed high­way traffic with com­plex traffic lights.

How is this pos­sible? Through a driver­less car be­ing de­veloped at Carne­gie Mel­lon Uni­versity. Shuster prob­ably wants one, con­sid­er­ing that he has to make the drive from Wash­ing­ton to his ho­met­own of Hol­l­i­days­burg, Pa., at least once a week. (He says it’s two hours and 40 minutes with no traffic.)

But, of course, Shuster may re­think the whole driver­less concept when he sees the gi­ant “Emer­gency Stop” red but­ton where the car ra­dio should be. He shouldn’t worry, though. A “dul­cet fe­male voice” will tell him ex­actly what is go­ing on, ac­cord­ing to a de­scrip­tion of the car from the Pitt­s­burgh Post-Gaz­ette.

Shuster will be rid­ing with Barry Schoch, Pennsylvania’s trans­port­a­tion sec­ret­ary, to high­light the need to main­tain in­nov­a­tion in trans­port­a­tion in the United States. That’s a noble goal for the trans­port­a­tion guru of Con­gress to ex­press. But at the press con­fer­ence af­ter­ward, ex­pect most of the ques­tions to go to the en­gin­eers who de­signed the car at the CMU-Gen­er­al Mo­tors Autonom­ous Driv­ing Col­lab­or­at­ive Re­search Lab. Does it honk in traffic? Can it par­al­lel park? When can I get one?

The cur­rent ver­sion is a 2011 Ca­dillac SRX equipped with four com­puters, mul­tiple sensors, radars, lasers, and of course GPS. The en­gin­eers say 90 per­cent of all car ac­ci­dents are caused by hu­man er­ror, such as dis­trac­ted driv­ing, sleep­i­ness, or drunk­en­ness. Don’t for­get just plain stu­pid­ity. A car that drives it­self, pre­sum­ably, has noth­ing bet­ter to do than get you to your des­tin­a­tion while you text your sweetie or put on your makeup.

Of course, it’s prob­ably go­ing to be 10 years or more be­fore such vehicles are avail­able com­mer­cially. But we can only dream.

There’s no word yet on wheth­er Shuster will be in the driver’s seat or rid­ing shot­gun.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
30 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×