An Antiwar Activist Searches for a Way to Support a Strike on Syria

Like many Democrats, Iraq opponent and Vietnam protestor Gerald Connolly now wants to back President Obama’s call to attack.

Protesters against U.S. intervention in Syria march during a demonstration in Boston, Saturday, Aug. 31, 2013. 
National Journal
Ben Terris
Sept. 5, 2013, 3:55 a.m.

It was 1968. His her­oes Bobby Kennedy and Mar­tin Luth­er King Jr. were dead. The Vi­et­nam War raged on. Ger­ald Con­nolly, a nat­ive of Bo­ston, now a House mem­ber from Vir­gin­ia, walked to Fen­way Park to listen to folk and blues mu­sic from Pete See­ger and B.B. King, and to listen as pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate Eu­gene Mc­Carthy pledged to end the war if elec­ted. A self-de­scribed “avid act­ive op­pon­ent of the Vi­et­nam War,” Con­nolly counseled con­scien­tious ob­ject­ors on their rights and op­tions. Hear­ing Mc­Carthy speak gave him just a glim­mer of hope. Then, he nev­er made it out of the primary.

“When Nix­on won, it was tre­mend­ously dis­ap­point­ing,” Con­nolly says. “When we learned his secret plan to end the war was to ex­pand it, that’s something that I’ll nev­er for­get.”

All this is to say that Con­nolly has long been an an­ti­war Demo­crat. But now, after rev­el­a­tions that Syr­ia’s Bashar al-As­sad used chem­ic­al weapons against his own people, Con­nolly finds him­self be­set with “one of the gravest” votes he’s had to make since 2008, when he was elec­ted to the House from his Fair­fax-area dis­trict. Con­nolly must de­cide wheth­er he can sup­port cast­ing a vote that could launch mis­siles in­to a coun­try that has not been de­clared an en­emy of the United States. Vot­ing no means go­ing against his pres­id­ent — the man whose can­did­acy spurred the turnout that helped pro­pel Con­nolly to of­fice.

“The ideo­lo­gic­al base of our party is strongly an­ti­war, and an­ti­mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion,” Con­nolly told Na­tion­al Journ­al on Wed­nes­day as de­bate over Pres­id­ent Obama’s re­quest raged on Cap­it­ol Hill. “And there are reas­ons for that.”

But Con­nolly, like many Demo­crats at the mo­ment, isn’t a def­in­ite “no” when it comes to the vote. While he says he re­mains un­de­cided, he and Demo­crat Rep. Chris Van Hol­len of Mary­land are in the midst of draft­ing a res­ol­u­tion for a lim­ited strike in Syr­ia. He says he won’t sup­port any­thing “too broad” or that could put boots on the ground, but he feels it’s pos­sible that do­ing noth­ing at all could be the worst pos­sib­il­ity. “There are cer­tainly risks and wor­ries about do­ing something, but are they big enough to pre­clude me from do­ing any­thing?” Con­nolly wondered out loud in a phone in­ter­view. “That’s the struggle.”

And such is the con­flict for many Demo­crats as they head to a vote next week on the mat­ter. A new poll from The Wash­ing­ton Post and ABC News found that six in 10 Amer­ic­ans dis­ap­prove of a strike on Syr­ia. The num­ber among pro­gress­ives is much high­er still at 73 per­cent op­pos­ing, ac­cord­ing to the Pro­gress­ive Change Cam­paign Com­mit­tee. And yet, with Obama call­ing for ac­tion, many Demo­crats are look­ing for a ra­tionale to come on­board and act as a team play­er.

Much of the anti-at­tack sen­ti­ment comes from a pub­lic that has been de­scribed ad nau­seum as “war weary” in re­cent weeks. But Con­nolly says he is try­ing not to think about the wars in Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan when mak­ing his de­cision.

“It’s easy for people to make an ana­logy there,” he says. “But I’ve been try­ing to make the case that that’s a com­pletely false ana­logy, though it’s an un­der­stand­able one. It’s fresh in our minds, and we feel burned, but it’s not the same thing.”

It’s im­port­ant to Con­nolly that he fig­ure out a way to draw that dis­tinc­tion, for he be­lieves the ar­gu­ments for go­ing to war in Ir­aq were “com­pletely spe­cious. Either wish­ful think­ing or en­tirely fab­ric­ated.” With re­gard to Syr­ia, Con­nolly is con­fid­ent that chem­ic­al weapons were in fact used. And per­haps biggest for him is his con­vic­tion that Obama is “truly a re­luct­ant war­ri­or,” when it comes to Syr­ia.

“This isn’t a case of a pres­id­ent want­ing to go to war,” he says. “And that’s a big dif­fer­ence.”

Con­nolly is no stranger to for­eign policy. The gradu­ate of the Kennedy School of Gov­ern­ment at Har­vard worked on the Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee for a dec­ade. His wealthy North­ern Vir­gin­ia dis­trict is home to the largest num­ber of fed­er­al con­tract­ors and gov­ern­ment work­ers in the na­tion. But what would his col­lege-age self say to him now, see­ing an older man not only vot­ing to sanc­tion a mis­sile strike but help­ing to draft a res­ol­u­tion to per­mit it. Con­nolly likes to think he would un­der­stand. “Even when I was protest­ing the Vi­et­nam War, I al­ways made a dis­tinc­tion between be­ing a pa­ci­fist and an an­ti­war act­iv­ist,” he says. “I was nev­er a pa­ci­fist. No war is de­sir­able, but I’d re­cog­nize that some­times ac­tion is ne­ces­sary.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4419) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×