The U.S. Postal Service on Thursday postponed until late September its decision on whether to request a postal-rate increase — which some outside groups have said they fear could reach as high as 10 percent.
A statement released by the Postal Service’s board of governors confirmed that the panel met Thursday and, as part of its agenda in a closed-door meeting, “considered pricing issues, including the possibility of filing for price adjustments.”
The governors, the statement said, “continue to listen to stakeholders and have postponed final pricing decisions until the next scheduled Board of Governors meeting” scheduled for Sept. 24 and 25.
The board is weighing the move as the Postal Service continues to bleed money — as much as $19 billion since early 2012. The increased costs would hit everyone, including individuals who put a stamp on a piece of mail. Coalitions and groups that represent big mailers — like magazines, newspapers, and direct-marketing groups — have been lobbying aggressively against any big hike.
Members of Congress led by House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., have been wrestling with ways to cut the Postal Service’s costs, such as ending Saturday mail delivery.
“It’s an agency in crisis,” Issa said this summer, “but it’s also an entity that must be saved, but it’s an entity that needs to trim costs.”
Postal-rate increases are capped at inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index. That would mean an allowable increase of about 2 percent for implementation in January.
But a 2006 law also allows the Postal Service to seek a higher rate increase beyond the CPI in instances of “exigent” circumstances — and that is what is under consideration now. Such requests are to be made to the Postal Regulatory Commission, which has 90 days to pass them.
In 2010, the Postal Service submitted a request for an exigent rate increase of 5.6 percent — far avove the CPI cap — that would have brought in more than $3 billion annually. But the mailers fought that increase in court and it was derailed.
Some of the same groups that lobbied against that hike said Thursday they were encouraged by the decision to delay a new formal request for such an “exigent” rate increase.
“This action affords us additional time to work with them and detail the devastating impact a rate increase would have on the mailing industry and the 8.4 million jobs that depend on it,” said Mary Berner, president and CEO of the Association of Magazine Media, in a statement.
“It also gives us, the Postal Service, and the entire mailing industry additional time to continue working in concert to convince Congress that the solution to the Postal Service’s problems lies not in rate increases, but in meaningful postal-reform legislation,” she said.
What We're Following See More »
When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage.
The House on Tuesday voted 403-12 "to pass an overhaul to the nation’s chemical safety standards for the first time in four decades. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act aims to answer years of complaints that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks the necessary authority to oversee and control the thousands of chemicals being produced and sold in the United States. It also significantly clamps down on states’ authorities, in an effort to stop a nationwide patchwork of chemical laws that industry says is difficult to deal with."
Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."
Bernie Sanders "signed a letter Tuesday morning requesting a full and complete check and recanvass of the election results in Kentucky ... where he trails Hillary Clinton by less than one-half of 1 percent of the vote. The Sanders campaign said it has asked the Kentucky secretary of state to have election officials review electronic voting machines and absentee ballots from last week's primary in each of the state's 120 counties.
Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) “is the subject of an ongoing investigation by the FBI and … the Justice Department” for potentially improper contributions to his 2013 campaign, including while he was a Clinton Global Initiative board member. ... Among the McAuliffe donations that drew the interest of the investigators was $120,000 from” former Chinese legislator Wang Wenliang. “U.S. election law prohibits foreign nationals from donating to … elections. … But Wang holds U.S. permanent resident status.”