Bashar al-Assad Tells Charlie Rose Congress Will Get in Obama’s Way on Syria … in 2010

On Monday night, PBS will air a new interview between Charlie Rose and Syria’s Bashar al-Assad. But it’s not the first time the two have met.

Syrian President Bashar Assad leaves the Elysee Palace following his meeting with his French counterpart Nicolas Sarkozy, in Paris, Friday Nov. 13, 2009. Assad says that Mideast peace will be the main issue in his talks with President Nicolas Sarkozy and that "France must act." (AP Photo/Remy de la Mauviniere)
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Matt Berman
Sept. 9, 2013, 6:47 a.m.

“I trust Sen­at­or Kerry, and I think he is earn­est,” Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar al-As­sad told PBS’s Charlie Rose. “I’m con­vinced Pres­id­ent Obama wants to do something pos­it­ive [on Middle East peace],” he con­tin­ued. “But I’m not con­vinced that the in­sti­tu­tion would al­low Pres­id­ent Obama to do what he wants to do with Syr­ia and in oth­er sub­jects and is­sues.”

This was in May, 2010. In a lengthy in­ter­view with Rose, As­sad re­flec­ted on re­la­tions between the U.S. and Syr­ia, and on how John Kerry, then chair­man of the Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee, and the pres­id­ent were look­ing to im­prove the re­la­tion­ship.

Three years later, much is dif­fer­ent. In a new in­ter­view with Rose on the eve of pos­sible U.S. strikes against Syr­ia, As­sad says that his coun­try will look to re­tali­ate if an at­tack does hap­pen, and that the U.S. and its al­lies should “ex­pect every ac­tion.” But as As­sad said in 2010, “the in­sti­tu­tion” — also known as Con­gress — may not just let Obama do what he wants. 

Here are the high­lights from As­sad’s 2010 in­ter­view, with the full video.

As­sad on the United States’ track re­cord in the Middle East

We are won­der­ing about what strategy the United States has to­ward the dif­fer­ent con­flict, wheth­er Ir­aq, Afgh­anistan, peace pro­cess, and any oth­er main con­flict. But I’m talk­ing about dif­fer­ent ad­min­is­tra­tions, not only this ad­min­is­tra­tion. The ques­tion that we asked too many of­fi­cials is, what is your strategy? They only put the title of sta­bil­ity, but sta­bil­ity is the fi­nal — is the goal of all — the fi­nal stage or the fi­nal end of solv­ing all the oth­er prob­lems.

So the United States ad­min­is­tra­tion has been fail­ing, fail­ing, and fail­ing, in still solv­ing the prob­lems. Why? This is re­lated to what I said that the re­gion has changed. They have to ad­opt dif­fer­ent ap­proach to­ward our re­gion. They can­not ad­opt the same ap­proach.

On the role the U.S. should play in the re­gion

If they want to play the role of the ar­bit­er, they can­not play that role while they are sided with the Is­rael­is. They have to be im­par­tial ar­bit­er. They are not. And they were nev­er im­par­tial ar­bit­ers since the be­gin­ning of the peace pro­cess. 

They have to gain the trust of the dif­fer­ent play­ers. If you don’t have good re­la­tions with Syr­ia, how can Syr­ia de­pend on you as ar­bit­er?

On his re­la­tion­ship with John Kerry

I trust Sen­at­or Kerry. I trust Sen­at­or Kerry, and I think he is earn­est. And I met him five times be­fore this meet­ing. I met him five times in very dif­fi­cult cir­cum­stances. So what he said, he said what he means.

On the U.S. polit­ic­al sys­tem

CHARLIE ROSE: You seem to be say­ing that Pres­id­ent Obama has the right ideas but you’re not sure that he can act on them.

AS­SAD: No, be­cause he can­not, be­cause you have in­sti­tu­tions in the United States. You have your polit­ic­al sys­tem. It is not only the pres­id­ent. If it’s only the pres­id­ent, we could blame the pres­id­ent. We can say that he didn’t do what he had to do.

But you have the in­sti­tu­tions and you have the Con­gress. For ex­ample, the am­bas­sad­or to Syr­ia who was about to come, but the Con­gress, the Re­pub­lic­ans in the Con­gress op­posed it re­cently. So that is why I said it’s not that the pres­id­ent doesn’t want to or he can­not do something. It is about the whole polit­ic­al sys­tem that you have in the United States. And you know more than me about it.

On U.S. un­der­stand­ing of Ir­an and the Middle East

They mis­un­der­stand the re­gion, def­in­itely. And that some­times is nor­mal be­cause it is dif­fer­ent cul­ture very far away.

But after the 11th of Septem­ber, at least after the 11th of Septem­ber, you should learn more about what is hap­pen­ing be­hind the ocean. It is not about what you think. It is about what we think. They have to un­der­stand the so­ci­ety, the cul­ture in this re­gion, and in the rest of the world that this re­gion, be­cause it is com­plic­ated….

They don’t un­der­stand that we want peace. But if you want peace, it doesn’t mean — to sign’s peace treaty, it doesn’t mean we sign ca­pit­u­la­tion agree­ment. That’s what they don’t un­der­stand. There is a big dif­fer­ent between ca­pit­u­la­tion agree­ment and peace treaty.

Peace treaty means hav­ing all your rights. This is the second about Ir­an, the nuc­le­ar is­sue. The nuc­le­ar fight is about Ir­an hav­ing the right to have peace­ful nuc­le­ar re­act­or. You can­not deal with Ir­an through the Se­cur­ity Coun­cil through threats.

What We're Following See More »
IN ADDITION TO DNC AND DCCC
Clinton Campaign Also Hacked
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
AFFECTS NOVEMBER ELECTIONS
North Carolina Voter ID Law Struck Down
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The US Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday overturned North Carolina's 2013 voter ID law, saying it was passed with “discriminatory intent." The decision sends the case back to the district judge who initially dismissed challenges to the law. "The ruling prohibits North Carolina from requiring photo identification from voters in future elections, including the November 2016 general election, restores a week of early voting and preregistration for 16- and 17-year-olds, and ensures that same-day registration and out-of-precinct voting will remain in effect."

Source:
NORTH DAKOTA TO ILLINOIS
Massive Oil Pipeline Approved for the Midwest
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

An oil pipeline almost as long as the much-debated Keystone XL has won final approval to transport crude from North Dakota to Illinois, traveling through South Dakota and Iowa along the way. "The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers gave the final blessing to the Dakota Access pipeline on Tuesday. Developers now have the last set of permits they need to build through the small portion of federal land the line crosses, which includes major waterways like the Mississippi and the Missouri rivers. The so-called Bakken pipeline goes through mostly state and private land."

Source:
DISAPPOINTING RESULTS
GDP Grew at 1.2% in Q2
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The U.S. economy grew at an anemic 1.2% in the second quarter, "well below the 2.6% growth economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal had forecast." Consumer spending was "robust," but it was offset by "cautious" business investment. "Since the recession ended seven years ago, the expansion has failed to achieve the breakout growth seen in past recoveries. "The average annual growth rate during the current business cycle, 2.1%, remains the weakest of any expansion since at least 1949."

Source:
×