A Strike Against Syria Is Getting Drastically Less Popular

A new poll shows a huge spike in the number of Americans from the end of August to last week who oppose a U.S. attack on Syria.

Protesters against U.S. military action in Syria during a demonstration in front of the White House in Washington, Monday, Sept. 9, 2013. 
National Journal
Matt Berman
Add to Briefcase
Matt Berman
Sept. 9, 2013, 9:11 a.m.

Nearly two-thirds of Amer­ic­ans are op­posed to a U.S. strike against Syr­ia, ac­cord­ing to a poll out Monday from the Pew Re­search Cen­ter and USA Today. That’s a big dif­fer­ence from polling just a week ago, which showed that 48 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans op­posed a strike.

Here’s the com­par­at­ive break­down from Pew:

And so much for the idea that mat­ters of (sup­posed) na­tion­al se­cur­ity cross par­tis­an lines. The dif­fer­ence over last week is most pro­nounced among Re­pub­lic­ans, with a 30 per­cent jump in the num­ber op­posed:

A ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans (54 per­cent) also now say that the pres­id­ent has not ex­plained his ra­tionale for a strike clearly enough, present­ing Obama with a ser­i­ous chal­lenge when he ad­dresses the na­tion Tues­day night. At the same time, Amer­ic­ans are nearly evenly di­vided on wheth­er or not Syr­ia poses a threat to the United States, with 45 per­cent say­ing it does and 50 per­cent say­ing it does not.

The polling data, while a mean­ing­ful dif­fer­ence from last week, isn’t really sur­pris­ing. George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity pro­fess­or Sarah Bind­er ad­dressed a lot of these is­sues in a post at The Mon­key Cage last week. On par­tis­an­ship, Bind­er sur­mised that, based on re­search, “war polit­ics in Con­gress might closely re­semble do­mest­ic le­gis­lat­ive battles.” Con­gresses have his­tor­ic­ally broken down by party on for­eign con­flicts, ac­cord­ing to re­search from Wil­li­am G. How­ell and Jon C. Peve­house.

On pub­lic opin­ion, Bind­er points to re­search from MIT’s Adam Ber­insky that shows the in­flu­ence elite opin­ion has on the pub­lic’s view of a war’s mer­its. “When polit­ic­al elites dis­agree as to the wis­dom of in­ter­ven­tion,” Ber­insky writes, “the pub­lic di­vides as well.”

But when elites come to a com­mon in­ter­pret­a­tion of a polit­ic­al real­ity, the pub­lic gives them great lat­it­ude to wage war.

Right now, elite opin­ion is nowhere near a com­mon in­ter­pret­a­tion. And from the looks of the Pew poll and a new poll out from CNN/ORC In­ter­na­tion­al, the pub­lic is a far dis­tance from giv­ing any­one lat­it­ude for any­thing.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4428) }}

What We're Following See More »
CAN’T WITHHOLD FUNDING
Trump’s Sanctuary Cities Order Blocked
3 hours ago
BREAKING
EMERGING BUDGET FRAMEWORK?
Dems Proposes Obamacare-for-Defense Deal
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."

Source:
WHITE HOUSE BLOCKING DOC REQUEST
Michael Flynn Remains A Russian-Sized Problem
4 hours ago
BREAKING

The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.

Source:
MARYLAND, VIRGINIA, D.C.
DC Area To Experience Terror Attack Drill Wednesday Morning
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The Washington, D.C. area will undergo "a full-scale exercise" Wednesday morning "designed to prepare for the possibility of a complex coordinated terror attack in the National Capital Region." The drill will take place at six different sites throughout the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia. The drill should not be taken as a sign that emergency services are expecting an attack, said Scott Boggs, Managing Director of Homeland Security and Public Safety at the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.

Source:
HUFFINGTON POST EFFORT ID’D PROBLEMS
Inauguration Committee Admits to Faulty Donor Records
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The Presidential Inaugural Committee "acknowledged late Monday that a final report it filed with the Federal Election Commission this month was riddled with errors, many of which were first identified through a crowdsourced data project at HuffPost." The committee raised about $100 million for the festivities, but the 500-page FEC report, which detailed where that money came from, was riddled with problems. The likely culprit: a system of access codes sent out by the GOP's ticketing system. Those codes were then often passed around on the secondary market.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login