The latest in a string of developments bordering on action-film-style pacing is a stunner: The Syrian government is ready to reveal its chemical weapons — that it denied it even possessed as recently as Sunday — and hand them over to the international community to be destroyed.
Russia Today reports that Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem says the country is ready to sign the Chemical Weapons Convention — a 1993 arms agreement that outlaws the production, stockpiling, and use of chemical weapons — which 189 countries, including the United States, have signed. The announcement comes on the heels of a proposal by Russia on Monday, triggered by a seemingly offhand remark by Secretary of State John Kerry, that Syria put its chemical weapons under international control to avoid U.S. military aggression. In an interview with a Lebanon-based channel, Muallem said:
We are ready to fulfill our obligations in compliance with this treaty, including through the provision of information about our chemical weapons. We will open our storage sites, and cease production. We are ready to open these facilities to Russia, other countries and the United Nations.
France is currently working on a resolution to put before the United Nations Security Council that demands the inspection, confiscation, and destruction of Syria’s chemical-weapons stockpile. Should Syria agree to and then later violate the agreement, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said there would be “very serious consequences.”
If Syria signs on to the CWC and publicizes its storage sites, a flood of U.N. inspectors will likely enter the country to inspect the stockpile. Although not everyone in the international community is convinced, U.S. officials say they’ve already got enough evidence to say that Assad was behind the Aug. 21 attacks that killed more than 1,400 civilians. If that’s true, and future investigations start to sway the public to that claim, what will happen to Assad?
Fabius says the Syrian president would have to resign, at the very least. “We can’t imagine that someone who was responsible for 110,000 dead, it is said, can stay in power forever.”
With all the talk of preserving international norms when it comes to chemical-weapons use, it’s tough to imagine a potential Assad resignation will be anywhere near enough for those involved. The Syrian National Coalition, the opposition to the Assad regime, voiced this sentiment in a statement on Tuesday: “Crimes against humanity cannot be dropped by giving political concessions or by handing over the weapons used in these crimes.” It’s unlikely world powers, especially the U.S., will set such a precedent that suggests the act of owning up is enough to escape justice when it comes to chemical weapons.
The CWC outlines that the use of chemical weapons is prohibited in all circumstances, including in non-international armed conflicts. The agreement could keep Syria’s chemical-weapons program in check, but there are no provisions about punishment of the leaders who built the program. The Rome Statute, the treaty that established the International Criminal Court, lists “employing asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and all analogous liquids, materials or devices” as a violation of international law. Syria isn’t party to the ICC (neither is the U.S.), but Assad could be charged if the U.N. Security Council successfully refers his case to the court. Slate points out that Russia and China will make such a move difficult, but the U.S. and France may still put up a fight.
For world powers, it’s too early to start thinking about what to do with Assad if the U.N. steps in — especially since talks about concrete language from Russia on a resolution have already hit a snag. France’s draft resolution, supported by the U.S., is set to be under Chapter 7 of the U.N. charter, making it enforceable with military action. According to the AP, President Vladimir Putin said the plan to take away Syria’s chemical weapons will only work if “the American side and those who support the U.S.A, in this sense, reject the use of force.”
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."