Why Everyone Is Running for President

It used to make sense to play coy about your ambitions, but not anymore.

Rep. Pete King, R-N.Y., talks to fellow Republicans at the Carroll County Lobster Bake, Sept. 7, 2013, in Wolfeboro, N.H. (AP Photo/Jim Cole)
National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Shane Goldmacher
Sept. 12, 2013, 4:10 p.m.

Less than 24 hours after Rep. Peter King first sug­ges­ted he was in­ter­ested in run­ning for pres­id­ent in 2016, the out­spoken New York Re­pub­lic­an was mic’d up and star­ing in­to a morn­ing tele­vi­sion live shot.

King had wanted a big­ger plat­form for his hawk­ish take on for­eign policy — es­pe­cially as his ideo­lo­gic­al GOP rival, Sen. Rand Paul of Ken­tucky, garnered ever more at­ten­tion for his dovish and liber­tari­an pro­nounce­ments. For King, float­ing his own name as a pres­id­en­tial hope­ful turned out to be just the trick. “I’m not do­ing this just to stop Rand Paul, be­lieve me,” King says. “But I do be­lieve we need a strong na­tion­al de­fense policy.”

In the months be­fore his Ju­ly pres­id­en­tial mus­ings, King had av­er­aged few­er than one Sunday show ap­pear­ance a month. Af­ter­ward? He was a mag­net for TV book­ers, spin­ning through the stu­di­os of CNN, ABC, CBS, and Fox News on four straight Sundays — the last of which pit­ted King op­pos­ite Paul. He was on NBC’s Meet the Press last week.

The King me­dia boom­let is the latest proof that hav­ing your name in the pres­id­en­tial hop­per is one of the most valu­able cur­ren­cies in Amer­ic­an polit­ics. It cre­ates an in­flux of me­dia at­ten­tion and a po­ten­tial na­tion­al base for cam­paign cash. Be­ing asked “the ques­tion” is of value, even if you’ve planted the query your­self or answered it without be­ing asked in the first place. “There’s al­most no down­side to feed­ing the be­gin­ning of the be­gin­ning of the con­ver­sa­tion,” says vet­er­an Re­pub­lic­an strategist Mike Murphy. “When the me­dia switches in­to who-is-run­ning mode, like they are right now, it costs you noth­ing to throw one of your logs onto their bon­fire.”

It’s why so many politi­cians are test­ing the pres­id­en­tial wa­ters these days — with vis­its to the key early primary states of Iowa, New Hamp­shire, and South Car­o­lina. They get a na­tion­al mega­phone for the price of a plane tick­et and a press re­lease. Off went former Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., tour­ing the Iowa State Fair­grounds, corn dog in hand, last month. Texas Gov. Rick Perry, whose 2012 GOP bid flopped badly, an­nounced he’s mulling 2016 and head­ing back to Iowa this fall. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, vis­ited this sum­mer and made a show of re­noun­cing his Ca­na­dian cit­izen­ship. He’s headed back again to head­line an Iowa Re­pub­lic­an Party fun­draiser in Oc­to­ber. Even Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Min­nesota Demo­crat without any dis­cern­ible na­tion­al fol­low­ing, traveled to the leadoff-caucus state to speak to party loc­als this sum­mer. “It’s nice to be on the list,” said Klobuchar of the 2016 chat­ter dur­ing her Iowa vis­it, as if that wasn’t the point.

“You should nev­er say nev­er in this busi­ness,” failed 2004 Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate Howard Dean told CNN this sum­mer. No sur­prise: He’s keep­ing the door ajar for 2016.

No House mem­ber has as­cen­ded dir­ectly to the White House since James Gar­field in 1880. But Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, is non­ethe­less talk­ing up a pres­id­en­tial run, hav­ing vis­ited New Hamp­shire and South Car­o­lina this sum­mer. The tim­ing of his tri­al bal­loon co­in­cided nicely with his “Stop Am­nesty” tour — doub­ling up on cov­er­age.

The 2012 pres­id­en­tial cam­paign gave Re­pub­lic­ans an un­usu­al in­cent­ive to run. Vir­tu­ally every de­clared GOP can­did­ate, from Rep. Michele Bach­mann to pizza mag­nate Her­man Cain to former House Speak­er Newt Gin­grich, graced the top of the polls at some point. And even the losers can end up win­ning: Gin­grich is the new co­host of CNN’s Cross­fire. The 2008 GOP run­ner-up, Mike Hucka­bee (who hasn’t “ruled it out” for 2016), got a show on Fox News.

The money game, too, en­cour­ages seri­al pres­id­en­tial ex­plor­a­tions. Steve King, for in­stance, watched last cycle as Bach­mann’s cam­paign helped her leapfrog him as the go-to voice for angry tea parti­ers — and the re­cip­i­ent of their cam­paign con­tri­bu­tions. She raised more than $25 mil­lion last cycle; he raised $3.7 mil­lion.

In the age of su­per PACs, every can­did­ate is one rich pat­ron away from be­ing a con­tender. The 2012 GOP primary des­cen­ded at times in­to a proxy war between bil­lion­aire be­ne­fact­ors: Casino mag­nate Shel­don Ad­el­son and his wife poured $20 mil­lion in­to a pro-Gin­grich su­per PAC, while in­vestor Foster Friess spent $2 mil­lion on a group back­ing Rick San­tor­um (who re­cently vis­ited Iowa and, pre­dict­ably, is hint­ing about 2016). “I think 2012 set the ex­ample that, with one or two wealthy guys who want to fund you — why the heck not?” says Matt Strawn, chair­man of the Iowa Re­pub­lic­an Party dur­ing the 2012 caucuses.

There is an al­most in­verse re­la­tion­ship between how hard a politi­cian works to be men­tioned for 2016 and how ser­i­ous a can­did­ate he or she is. Hil­lary Rod­ham Clin­ton will be asked “the ques­tion” no mat­ter what she does. Rand Paul doesn’t have to say he’s run­ning; it’s pre­sumed. Same for Sen. Marco Ru­bio, R-Fla. Brown, on the oth­er hand, ac­tu­ally had to show up in Iowa after he’d passed on more-win­nable Sen­ate and gubernat­ori­al races in Mas­sachu­setts. For Peter King, hint­ing at high­er of­fice has be­come something of a pas­time. He toyed with Sen­ate bids in 2000, 2004, and 2010, and, briefly, a pres­id­en­tial run in 2012. He nev­er ran, but he al­ways got the pub­li­city.

The can­did­acy charade can go on only so long. Even­tu­ally politi­cians have to set up com­mit­tees, raise money, and hire polit­ic­al op­er­at­ives. Un­til then, it’s flirt­ing sea­son. “It’s like an eighth-grade kid say­ing he wants to be an as­tro­naut,” Murphy says. “Great! Let’s see who ac­tu­ally shows up at NASA for train­ing.”

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
13 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×