With Syria on Hold, Senate Settles for Energy Debate

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid speaks at the Capitol.
National Journal
Amy Harder
Sept. 11, 2013, 6:07 p.m.

Pro­ponents of an en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency bill may want to thank Rus­sia for their meas­ure fi­nally get­ting its long-awaited day in the Sen­ate.

Be­cause of the im­promptu dip­lo­mat­ic talks triggered by Rus­sia that are un­der way in hopes of resolv­ing the Syr­i­an con­flict, the Sen­ate has put on the back burn­er a res­ol­u­tion to au­thor­ize mil­it­ary ac­tion against the Middle East­ern coun­try. In­stead, Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., on Wed­nes­day af­ter­noon moved to a bi­par­tis­an en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency bill that the Sen­ate had planned to de­bate this week be­fore the Syr­i­an de­bate es­cal­ated.

“I think it’s ap­pro­pri­ate that rather than sit here and tread wa­ter and do noth­ing, we should move for­ward on this le­gis­la­tion,” Re­id said on the Sen­ate floor in ref­er­ence to the bill sponsored by Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, D”‘N.H., and Rob Port­man, R-Ohio.

That wasn’t ex­actly a rous­ing in­tro­duc­tion to this en­ergy de­bate, but the meas­ure’s au­thors and the lead­ers of the Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee are non­ethe­less seiz­ing the mo­ment.

“It’s es­sen­tially the first stand-alone en­ergy bill to be de­bated on the floor of the Sen­ate since 2007,” said En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Chair­man Ron Wyden, D-Ore.

Com­par­ing today’s en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency meas­ure to the 2007 mam­moth of a bill is like apples to or­anges (or grapes to wa­ter­mel­ons). The en­ergy bill the Sen­ate is de­bat­ing now is 30 pages long, and has fully off­set costs and just one man­dat­ory meas­ure: to make the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment’s use of en­ergy more ef­fi­cient. The bill also in­cludes a host of vol­un­tary meas­ures, such as strength­en­ing na­tion­al build­ing codes and dir­ect­ing the En­ergy De­part­ment to en­cour­age de­vel­op­ment of en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency tech­no­logy.

In con­trast, the 2007 bill was 310 pages long, cost the gov­ern­ment mil­lions of dol­lars, and sig­ni­fic­antly strengthened both the re­new­able-fuel stand­ard for gas­ol­ine and fuel-eco­nomy stand­ards for vehicles.

Today, Re­pub­lic­ans are al­most uni­ver­sally op­posed to fed­er­al man­dates of all kinds, and Demo­crats aren’t go­ing to bat for them like they used to.

“Nobody is go­ing to be able to say this is part of a dumb fed­er­al man­date or some kind of run-from-Wash­ing­ton, one-size-fits-all ap­proach,” Wyden said.

A few minutes later, En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources rank­ing mem­ber Lisa Murkow­ski, R-Alaska, took to the floor to say: “I would not be sup­port­ing any pro­vi­sion if it re­quired man­dat­ory ad­op­tion of those [ef­fi­ciency] codes. But this bill is vol­un­tary.”

The bill has sup­port from a wide range of groups, in­clud­ing the U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce and the Nat­ur­al Re­sources De­fense Coun­cil. Its de­tract­ors are few, but among them is the free-mar­ket Her­it­age Found­a­tion, which claims the bill en­cour­ages waste­ful pro­grams and in­cent­ives.

The like­li­hood of this meas­ure’s pas­sage hinges much less on its sub­stance — which most sen­at­ors sup­port — and more on oth­er cir­cum­stances, namely what con­tro­ver­sial amend­ments may be offered and wheth­er the Sen­ate re­fo­cuses its at­ten­tion on Syr­ia.

It was un­clear by press time Wed­nes­day even­ing which con­ten­tious amend­ments, in­clud­ing one ap­prov­ing the Key­stone XL oil pipeline and an­oth­er strip­ping the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency of its power to reg­u­late green­house-gas emis­sions, might get votes. Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter, R-La., ob­jec­ted to al­low­ing more amend­ments Wed­nes­day un­til a deal was worked out on one he offered re­lated to Obama­care.

What We're Following See More »
PROCEDURES NOT FOLLOWED
Trump Not on Ballot in Minnesota
1 days ago
THE LATEST
MOB RULE?
Trump on Immigration: ‘I Don’t Know, You Tell Me’
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Perhaps Donald Trump can take a plebiscite to solve this whole messy immigration thing. At a Fox News town hall with Sean Hannity last night, Trump essentially admitted he's "stumped," turning to the audience and asking: “Can we go through a process or do you think they have to get out? Tell me, I mean, I don’t know, you tell me.”

Source:
BIG CHANGE FROM WHEN HE SELF-FINANCED
Trump Enriching His Businesses with Donor Money
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Donald Trump "nearly quintupled the monthly rent his presidential campaign pays for its headquarters at Trump Tower to $169,758 in July, when he was raising funds from donors, compared with March, when he was self-funding his campaign." A campaign spokesman "said the increased office space was needed to accommodate an anticipated increase in employees," but the campaign's paid staff has actually dipped by about 25 since March. The campaign has also paid his golf courses and restaurants about $260,000 since mid-May.

Source:
QUESTIONS OVER IMMIGRATION POLICY
Trump Cancels Rallies
4 days ago
THE LATEST

Donald Trump probably isn't taking seriously John Oliver's suggestion that he quit the race. But he has canceled or rescheduled rallies amid questions over his stance on immigration. Trump rescheduled a speech on the topic that he was set to give later this week. Plus, he's also nixed planned rallies in Oregon and Las Vegas this month.

Source:
‘STRATEGY AND MESSAGING’
Sean Hannity Is Also Advising Trump
4 days ago
THE LATEST

Donald Trump's Fox News brain trust keeps growing. After it was revealed that former Fox chief Roger Ailes is informally advising Trump on debate preparation, host Sean Hannity admitted over the weekend that he's also advising Trump on "strategy and messaging." He told the New York Times: “I’m not hiding the fact that I want Donald Trump to be the next president of the United States. I never claimed to be a journalist.”

Source:
×