With Syria on Hold, Senate Settles for Energy Debate

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid speaks at the Capitol.
National Journal
Amy Harder
Sept. 11, 2013, 6:07 p.m.

Pro­ponents of an en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency bill may want to thank Rus­sia for their meas­ure fi­nally get­ting its long-awaited day in the Sen­ate.

Be­cause of the im­promptu dip­lo­mat­ic talks triggered by Rus­sia that are un­der way in hopes of resolv­ing the Syr­i­an con­flict, the Sen­ate has put on the back burn­er a res­ol­u­tion to au­thor­ize mil­it­ary ac­tion against the Middle East­ern coun­try. In­stead, Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., on Wed­nes­day af­ter­noon moved to a bi­par­tis­an en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency bill that the Sen­ate had planned to de­bate this week be­fore the Syr­i­an de­bate es­cal­ated.

“I think it’s ap­pro­pri­ate that rather than sit here and tread wa­ter and do noth­ing, we should move for­ward on this le­gis­la­tion,” Re­id said on the Sen­ate floor in ref­er­ence to the bill sponsored by Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, D”‘N.H., and Rob Port­man, R-Ohio.

That wasn’t ex­actly a rous­ing in­tro­duc­tion to this en­ergy de­bate, but the meas­ure’s au­thors and the lead­ers of the Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee are non­ethe­less seiz­ing the mo­ment.

“It’s es­sen­tially the first stand-alone en­ergy bill to be de­bated on the floor of the Sen­ate since 2007,” said En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Chair­man Ron Wyden, D-Ore.

Com­par­ing today’s en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency meas­ure to the 2007 mam­moth of a bill is like apples to or­anges (or grapes to wa­ter­mel­ons). The en­ergy bill the Sen­ate is de­bat­ing now is 30 pages long, and has fully off­set costs and just one man­dat­ory meas­ure: to make the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment’s use of en­ergy more ef­fi­cient. The bill also in­cludes a host of vol­un­tary meas­ures, such as strength­en­ing na­tion­al build­ing codes and dir­ect­ing the En­ergy De­part­ment to en­cour­age de­vel­op­ment of en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency tech­no­logy.

In con­trast, the 2007 bill was 310 pages long, cost the gov­ern­ment mil­lions of dol­lars, and sig­ni­fic­antly strengthened both the re­new­able-fuel stand­ard for gas­ol­ine and fuel-eco­nomy stand­ards for vehicles.

Today, Re­pub­lic­ans are al­most uni­ver­sally op­posed to fed­er­al man­dates of all kinds, and Demo­crats aren’t go­ing to bat for them like they used to.

“Nobody is go­ing to be able to say this is part of a dumb fed­er­al man­date or some kind of run-from-Wash­ing­ton, one-size-fits-all ap­proach,” Wyden said.

A few minutes later, En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources rank­ing mem­ber Lisa Murkow­ski, R-Alaska, took to the floor to say: “I would not be sup­port­ing any pro­vi­sion if it re­quired man­dat­ory ad­op­tion of those [ef­fi­ciency] codes. But this bill is vol­un­tary.”

The bill has sup­port from a wide range of groups, in­clud­ing the U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce and the Nat­ur­al Re­sources De­fense Coun­cil. Its de­tract­ors are few, but among them is the free-mar­ket Her­it­age Found­a­tion, which claims the bill en­cour­ages waste­ful pro­grams and in­cent­ives.

The like­li­hood of this meas­ure’s pas­sage hinges much less on its sub­stance — which most sen­at­ors sup­port — and more on oth­er cir­cum­stances, namely what con­tro­ver­sial amend­ments may be offered and wheth­er the Sen­ate re­fo­cuses its at­ten­tion on Syr­ia.

It was un­clear by press time Wed­nes­day even­ing which con­ten­tious amend­ments, in­clud­ing one ap­prov­ing the Key­stone XL oil pipeline and an­oth­er strip­ping the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency of its power to reg­u­late green­house-gas emis­sions, might get votes. Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter, R-La., ob­jec­ted to al­low­ing more amend­ments Wed­nes­day un­til a deal was worked out on one he offered re­lated to Obama­care.

What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
1 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
2 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×