Harry Reid: The Anarchists Have Taken Over the Senate

Revolution!?

Professed anarchists march through the heart of Boston during a protest on the opening day of the Democratic National Convention in Boston, Monday, July 26, 2004. 
National Journal
Matt Berman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Matt Berman
Sept. 12, 2013, 8:19 a.m.

Rise! The time has come! The gov­ern­ment is no more! Or, well, at least that’s sort of what Sen. Harry Re­id, D-Nev., said on the Sen­ate floor Thursday morn­ing while talk­ing about an en­ergy bill.

“We’re di­ver­ted totally from what this bill is about,” he said. “Why? Be­cause the an­arch­ists have taken over. They’ve taken over the House, and now they’ve taken the Sen­ate.”

While there are cer­tainly Amer­ic­ans who wouldn’t mind see­ing the cur­rent Con­gress des­cend in­to chaos and flames, that isn’t really quite what’s hap­pen­ing today. “The an­arch­ists” Re­id is re­fer­ring to are just the rem­nants of the con­gres­sion­al tea party. And it’s not the first time he’s thrown around the term.

In an in­ter­view with NPR earli­er this sum­mer, Re­id elab­or­ated a bit more on his com­par­is­on.

Who is the tea party? Well, un­der­stand, when I was in school I stud­ied gov­ern­ment, among oth­er things. And pri­or to World War I and after World War I we had the an­arch­ists. Now, they were vi­ol­ent. Some say that’s what star­ted World War One, the an­archy move­ment. But they were vi­ol­ent. They did dam­age to prop­erty and they did phys­ic­al dam­age to people. The mod­ern an­arch­ists, don’t do that. That’s the tea party. But they have the same philo­sophy as the early an­arch­ists. They do not be­lieve in gov­ern­ment. Any time any­thing bad hap­pens to gov­ern­ment, that’s a vic­tory for them.

So should we ex­pect that the tea party could lead to, well, an­oth­er world war? Ob­vi­ously not, and it’s hard to ima­gine that Re­id really be­lieves that either, es­pe­cially giv­en his hedging to NPR.

But, just a re­fresh­er for Re­id and who­ever else. Let’s con­sult a dic­tion­ary.

An­arch­ist (noun):

1. a per­son who rebels against any au­thor­ity, es­tab­lished or­der, or rul­ing power.

2. a per­son who be­lieves in, ad­voc­ates, or pro­motes an­arch­ism or an­archy; es­pe­cially : one who uses vi­ol­ent means to over­throw the es­tab­lished or­der

So, sure, it’s un­likely that many tea parti­ers would dis­agree with the first part of Mer­ri­am-Web­ster’s defin­i­tion. But it’s that second part that is just a bit too prickly for it to make any lo­gic­al sense for Harry Re­id to touch.

Up­date: Here’s video of today’s com­ments from C-SPAN:

What We're Following See More »
DOESN’T WISH TO JOIN TRUMP
Christie Turned Down Labor Secretary
4 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

Over a meatloaf lunch at the White House last week, Donald Trump offered the job of Labor secretary to New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, a longtime loyalist. Christie promptly turned down the offer, once again signaling that he has no desire to move to Washington, D.C. to join the Trump administration. The job ended up going to Alexander Acosta, who is expected to sail through the Senate confirmation process.

Source:
BACKED BY U.S. FORCES
Iraqi Forces Reclaim Mosul Airport From ISIS
36 minutes ago
BREAKING
PREFER TO LET STATES DECIDE
White House Formally Withdrawals Transgender Bathroom Rules
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Trump administration on Wednesday formally withdrew Obama administration rules granting transgender individuals access to the sex-segregated facilities of their choice, including bathrooms." In an official letter to the civil-rights divisions of the Justice and Education departments, the administration wrote that it prefers to let states set the course on the issue, and also that the Obama-era rules don't “contain extensive legal analysis or explain how the position is consistent with the express language of Title IX, nor did they undergo any formal public process.”

Source:
THANKS TO MILITARY ROLE
McMaster Requires Congressional Approval
22 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Congress will need to vote on Donald Trump's pick of Lt. General H.R. McMaster to be his next national security adviser, but not for the reason you think. The position of NSA doesn't require Senate approval, but since McMaster currently holds a three-star military position, Congress will need to vote to allow him to keep his position instead of forcing him to drop one star and become a Major General, which could potentially affect his pension.

Source:
PLANS TO CURB ITS POWER
Pruitt Confirmed As EPA Head
5 days ago
BREAKING
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login