The Energy Debate That Wasn’t

Key Conservative Stance: Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) cast one of the two votes against confirming New York Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton as secretary of state, although her qualifications for the job were not an issue. Vitter has opposed much of the Obama administration agenda.
National Journal
Amy Harder and Clare Foran
See more stories about...
Amy Harder Clare Foran
Sept. 12, 2013, 3:30 p.m.

The second day of the Sen­ate’s first floor de­bate on an en­ergy bill in six years was marked by ob­struc­tion, op­pos­i­tion, and frus­tra­tion.

Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter, R-La., held firm in his re­fus­al to al­low de­bate to move for­ward to an en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency bill un­til Sen­ate lead­ers agree on a time to vote on his amend­ment re­lated to Pres­id­ent Obama’s health care law. Vit­ter first in­terfered with the en­ergy de­bate Wed­nes­day af­ter­noon, shortly after Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., moved to the bill in place of the Syr­ia res­ol­u­tion that was put on hold.

Vit­ter’s stance put an un­con­tro­ver­sial meas­ure with broad sup­port on a dif­fi­cult le­gis­lat­ive obstacle course.

“Sen­at­ors who have talked about en­ergy policy for years and years now say they want to have their is­sues that are un­re­lated to en­ergy ad­vance today, even though they have the po­ten­tial to un­der­mine this bill,” Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Chair­man Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said on the floor, show­ing clear frus­tra­tion. “I don’t know how that adds up, if you give a lot of speeches at home about sens­ible en­ergy policy and then take steps to un­der­mine it.”

Wyden didn’t name any names, but he didn’t have to.

“Since they were all dir­ec­ted at my activ­ity, I want to re­spond,” said Vit­ter just mo­ments after Wyden con­cluded his com­ments. “I have noth­ing against this bill, I ap­plaud that work. I did hear a lot this sum­mer — quite frankly, I didn’t hear about this bill or any pro­vi­sion of this bill. But I’m not den­ig­rat­ing it.”

Vit­ter isn’t the only Re­pub­lic­an seek­ing to pivot the de­bate. Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell, R-Ky., also filed an amend­ment to the en­ergy bill seek­ing to delay a key part of Obama­care. He spoke about the amend­ment Thursday morn­ing but didn’t men­tion the en­ergy bill at all.

A num­ber of oth­er Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors also used floor time to voice op­pos­i­tion to the health care law, in­clud­ing John Bar­rasso of Wyom­ing, Dan Coats of In­di­ana, and Jeff Flake of Ari­zona.

Among the GOP voices, Vit­ter’s was the loudest. Wheth­er sen­at­ors will ac­tu­ally get to de­bate en­ergy — even con­tro­ver­sial is­sues like the Key­stone XL pipeline and cli­mate-change reg­u­la­tions — now hinges on wheth­er Vit­ter either backs down from his amend­ment or comes to an agree­ment with Sen­ate lead­ers on an­oth­er path to vote on it down the road.

Even if a deal is reached with Vit­ter, more obstacles await. Sens. John Ho­even, R-N.D., and Mary Landrieu, D-La., in­tro­duced an amend­ment Thursday that would de­clare the Key­stone pipeline to be in the na­tion­al in­terest. A de­cision on a per­mit for the con­tro­ver­sial pro­ject is still pending at the State De­part­ment.

On an­oth­er thorny is­sue, Sens. Joe Don­nelly, D-Ind., and Roy Blunt, R-Mo., in­tro­duced an amend­ment that would ban the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency from re­quir­ing costly car­bon-cap­ture and se­quest­ra­tion tech­no­logy to be used in or­der to com­ply with cli­mate-change reg­u­la­tions. The amend­ment would in­stead re­quire the EPA to de­vel­op tech­no­logy stand­ards for dif­fer­ent fuels and dif­fer­ent sources of emis­sions.

Bar­rasso is also push­ing an amend­ment to block the agency’s up­com­ing cli­mate rules un­less they are ap­proved by Con­gress. The EPA is ex­pec­ted to is­sue reg­u­la­tions lim­it­ing car­bon emis­sions for new power plants very soon.

What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Preet Bharara Learned at the Foot of Chuck Schumer
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."

Source:
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
10 hours ago
THE LATEST
×