Can owners of big commercial buildings be “shamed” into using less energy? At least one senator and a key federal agency think so, and just this week Chicago joined a growing list of cities that are putting the theory to the test.
The concept is called energy benchmarking, and it requires owners of large buildings to publicly disclose their energy consumption on a regular basis. An ordinance passed by the Chicago City Council on Wednesday will require annual reports on energy usage for all buildings with more than 50,000 square feet of floor space.
“Good data drives markets and innovation,” Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel said in a statement of support for the new regulations. “[Benchmarking] will accelerate Chicago’s growth as a capital for green jobs by arming building owners, real estate companies, energy service companies, and others with the information they need to make smart, cost-saving investments.”
The Windy City isn’t the first to pass such a measure: Eight cities and two states, including Washington, D.C., have already adopted similar proposals. D.C.’s benchmarking mandate passed in 2008, and the first reports for buildings exceeding 100,000 square feet are due Oct. 1.
Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., has offered an amendment to an energy bill now being considered in the Senate that would require energy benchmarking for all federal buildings.
“The main thing my amendment does is to require that building spaces that are leased by the federal government measure and report their energy use,” Franken said in a floor statement Wednesday. “The federal government is the nation’s largest consumer of energy. Taxpayers are paying for all of that energy. We owe it to them to make sure our buildings save as much energy as possible.”
Energy benchmarking has also been championed by the Environmental Protection Agency, which offers Energy Star software to building owners that enables them to track energy use.
One building-management company in Washington, Akridge, uses the EPA program, and the company’s Sarah Pamula has some advice for building owners in Chicago who will soon be required to file reports. “They should start early,” Pamula said, saying it took her months corresponding with tenants to gather the required three years of reporting data. That got especially complicated when leases had changed hands, she said.
An energy-benchmarking specialist for the D.C. Department of the Environment, Marshall Duer-Balkind, said the initial startup problems are worth the payoff. “People are saying, ‘This was really hard at first, but I’m finding great use in it and great utility.’”¦ It’s helped them increase their efficiency and identify properties where they need to work.”
Not everyone in Chicago is on board with the new requirements. Michael Cornicelli, executive vice president of Chicago’s Building Owners and Managers Association, said the public disclosure mandate “will unfairly penalize and marginalize many older and historically significant buildings in Chicago.”
Cornicelli added: “Publishing the scores for buildings that simply cannot afford the work necessary to raise [their scores] will not ‘shame’ those buildings into achieving higher scores. It will simply impose yet another competitive burden on an already challenged sector.”
But Franken maintains that something has to be done to improve energy efficiency.
“In the United States, our energy consumption is about one-fifth of the world’s total energy consumption,” he said. “That’s remarkable when you consider that we have less than one-twentieth of the world’s population. But a tremendous amount of that energy is simply lost through inefficient buildings, appliances, industrial processes, and cars. Those losses have been estimated to cost U.S. businesses and households $130 billion each year.”
What We're Following See More »
"Despite pressure from the White House, House GOP leaders determined Thursday night that they didn’t have the votes to pass a rewrite of the Affordable Care Act and would not seek to put their proposal on the floor on Friday. A late push to act on health care had threatened the bipartisan deal to keep the government open for one week while lawmakers crafted a longer-term spending deal. Now, members are likely to approve the short-term spending bill when it comes to the floor and keep the government open past midnight on Friday."
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.
Members of Congress are eyeing a one-week spending bill which would keep the government open past the Friday night deadline, giving lawmakers an extra week to iron out a long-term deal to fund the government. Without any action, the government would run out of funding starting at midnight Saturday. “I am optimistic that a final funding package will be completed soon," said Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.