KING, PETER

A Royal Rebuke

King takes shot at Paul while discussing potential presidential bid.

Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sept. 13, 2013, 7:38 a.m.

Rep. Peter King (R-NY) said he’s mulling a pres­id­en­tial run be­cause of his con­cern over the dir­ec­tion of the GOP, spe­cific­ally re­gard­ing na­tion­al se­cur­ity. King: “Wheth­er it’s me or any­one else in the Re­pub­lic­an Party who runs, I hope we run on hav­ing strong na­tion­al de­fense and also car­ry­ing the ban­ner high. Wav­ing the ban­ner of the United States of Amer­ica and real­iz­ing that whatever oth­er coun­tries may do or whatever com­plaints they may have, no one has done more for free­dom than the United States. But most of all, Amer­ic­ans need to have faith in their lead­er that he’s not go­ing to back down when things get tough.”

In an in­ter­view, King “was un­spar­ing about his own party, too, say­ing he’s gravely con­cerned that Re­pub­lic­ans are start­ing to pro­ject the same im­age of timid­ity in in­ter­na­tion­al af­fairs that has plagued Demo­crats over the years.” King singled out Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), say­ing: “He’s a knee-jerk isol­a­tion­ist. Just the level of his ar­gu­ments — ‘build bridges in the U.S. rather than Afgh­anistan’ — has su­per­fi­cial ap­peal. But what does that mean? Does he con­sider, ana­lyze — what hap­pens when we with­draw?”

King “went so far as to say that the rise of anti-war voices in the GOP threatens to make Demo­crats the bet­ter op­tion for voters who want a strong na­tion­al de­fense.” King: “I want to make sure our al­tern­at­ive is bet­ter than theirs. … If I’m go­ing to be cri­ti­ciz­ing the Obama policies, and then we end up nom­in­at­ing someone whose policies I think are more dan­ger­ous than [Obama’s], we’ve failed as Re­pub­lic­ans.” (Politico)

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
23 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
2 days ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
2 days ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
2 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login