Since its publication Wednesday night, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s New York Times op-ed has been annotated, analyzed, and fact-checked. While the leader made a few compelling arguments in his plea to President Obama and the American people to not strike Syria, it was difficult for many to overlook Putin’s hypocrisy about following international law when it comes to the use of force and, most recently, gay rights.
In the past, Russia didn’t always hold the law of the world in the high regard its president gave it in his op-ed. In October 2010, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that a ban on gay-pride marches in Moscow unlawfully discriminated against activists’ on the basis of sexual orientation and violated their right to freedom of assembly. Last November, the U.N. Human Rights Committee ruled in favor of a Russian woman who had been arrested and fined in 2009 for displaying posters reading “Homosexuality is normal” and “I am proud of my homosexuality” near a high school.
Despite these rulings, Russia hasn’t cracked down on discrimination against the LGBT community. A ban on spreading “propaganda of nontraditional sexual relations” to minors, signed into law by Putin in June, is, according to several human-rights organizations, the latest in Russia’s violation of international law. Although Putin was addressing countries rather than individuals in the final line of his op-ed, his words don’t jibe with Russia’s antigay law: “We are all different, but when we ask for the Lord’s blessings, we must not forget that God created us equal.”
Tanya Lokshina of Human Rights Watch said of the law after it passed:
This legislation will do significant damage to Russia’s image internationally and, to pass it with full knowledge that it violates Russia’s international legal obligations, will call into question the essence of its commitment to international treaties it ratifies.
Russia is party to the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which protect the right to assemble in events such as the 100-person gay-rights march that Russian police broke up in June. Lokshina wrote that both treaties have issued rulings “that make it abundantly clear to any state party that the type of legislation banning ‘homosexual propaganda,’ which already exists in five regions of Russia and is proposed on federal level, would violate those rights and be a breach of international human-rights law.”
Putin has denied that his country has antigay policies. “I assure you that I work with these people, I sometimes award them with state prizes or decorations for their achievements in various fields,” Putin told the Associated Press. “We have absolutely normal relations, and I don’t see anything out of the ordinary here.”
Still, some in the international community expressed concern over the treatment of athletes at next year’s Winter Olympics in Russia. On Monday, the Sochi Games president told the International Olympic Committee that “the law will have no impact on the ability of athletes, fans, or a member of the Olympic family to participate at the Games.” He added that the Russian constitution guarantees “equality of rights and freedom, and it explicitly prohibits any prejudice against religion, race, and sex,” but didn’t mention sexual orientation.
What We're Following See More »
The Signal app is fast becoming the new favorite among those who are obsessed with the security and untraceabilty of their messaging. Just ask the Democratic National Committee. Or Edward Snowden. As Vanity Fair reports, before news ever broke that the DNC's servers had been hacked, word went out among the organization that the word "Trump" should never be used in their emails, lest it attract hackers' attention. Not long after, all Trump-related messages, especially disparaging ones, would need to be encrypted via the Snowden-approved Signal.
The Republican Study Committee may lose several members of the House Freedom Caucus next year, "potentially creating a split between two influential groups of House conservatives." The Freedom Caucus was founded at the inception of the current Congress by members who felt that the conservative RSC had gotten too cozy with leadership, "and its roughly 40 members have long clashed with the RSC over what tactics to use when pushing for conservative legislation." As many as 20 members may not join the RSC for the new Congress next year.
"The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Monday issued emergency authorization for a Zika diagnostics test from Swiss drugmaker Roche, skirting normal approval channels as the regulator moves to fight the disease's spread." Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reports that a new study in Nature identifies "about a dozen substances" that could "suppress the pathogen's replication." Some of them are already in clinical trials.
According to 37 newly released audits, "some private Medicare plans overcharged the government for the majority of elderly patients they treated." A number of Medicare Advantage plans overstated "the severity of medical conditions like diabetes and depression." The money has since been paid back, though some plans are appealing the federal audits.
"GOP leaders and House Democrats are already laying the groundwork for a short-term continuing resolution" on the budget this fall "that will set up a vote on a catch-all spending bill right before the holidays." As usual, however, the House Freedom Caucus may throw a wrench in Speaker Paul Ryan's gears. The conservative bloc doesn't appear willing to accept any CR that doesn't fund the government into 2017.