Since its publication Wednesday night, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s New York Times op-ed has been annotated, analyzed, and fact-checked. While the leader made a few compelling arguments in his plea to President Obama and the American people to not strike Syria, it was difficult for many to overlook Putin’s hypocrisy about following international law when it comes to the use of force and, most recently, gay rights.
In the past, Russia didn’t always hold the law of the world in the high regard its president gave it in his op-ed. In October 2010, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that a ban on gay-pride marches in Moscow unlawfully discriminated against activists’ on the basis of sexual orientation and violated their right to freedom of assembly. Last November, the U.N. Human Rights Committee ruled in favor of a Russian woman who had been arrested and fined in 2009 for displaying posters reading “Homosexuality is normal” and “I am proud of my homosexuality” near a high school.
Despite these rulings, Russia hasn’t cracked down on discrimination against the LGBT community. A ban on spreading “propaganda of nontraditional sexual relations” to minors, signed into law by Putin in June, is, according to several human-rights organizations, the latest in Russia’s violation of international law. Although Putin was addressing countries rather than individuals in the final line of his op-ed, his words don’t jibe with Russia’s antigay law: “We are all different, but when we ask for the Lord’s blessings, we must not forget that God created us equal.”
Tanya Lokshina of Human Rights Watch said of the law after it passed:
This legislation will do significant damage to Russia’s image internationally and, to pass it with full knowledge that it violates Russia’s international legal obligations, will call into question the essence of its commitment to international treaties it ratifies.
Russia is party to the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which protect the right to assemble in events such as the 100-person gay-rights march that Russian police broke up in June. Lokshina wrote that both treaties have issued rulings “that make it abundantly clear to any state party that the type of legislation banning ‘homosexual propaganda,’ which already exists in five regions of Russia and is proposed on federal level, would violate those rights and be a breach of international human-rights law.”
Putin has denied that his country has antigay policies. “I assure you that I work with these people, I sometimes award them with state prizes or decorations for their achievements in various fields,” Putin told the Associated Press. “We have absolutely normal relations, and I don’t see anything out of the ordinary here.”
Still, some in the international community expressed concern over the treatment of athletes at next year’s Winter Olympics in Russia. On Monday, the Sochi Games president told the International Olympic Committee that “the law will have no impact on the ability of athletes, fans, or a member of the Olympic family to participate at the Games.” He added that the Russian constitution guarantees “equality of rights and freedom, and it explicitly prohibits any prejudice against religion, race, and sex,” but didn’t mention sexual orientation.
What We're Following See More »
"A growing number of key Republicans are sending this message to the leaders of the congressional committees investigating potential Trump campaign collusion with the Russians: Wrap it up soon. In the House and Senate, several Republicans who sit on key committees are starting to grumble that the investigations have spanned the better part of the past nine months, contending that the Democratic push to extend the investigation well into next year could amount to a fishing expedition."
After initially promising it in August, "President Trump said Monday that he will declare a national emergency next week to address the opioid epidemic." When asked, he also "declined to express confidence in Rep. Tom Marino (R-Pa.), his nominee for drug czar, in the wake of revelations that the lawmaker helped steer legislation making it harder to act against giant drug companies."
In the wake of Sunday's blockbuster 60 Minutes/Washington Post report on opioid regulation and enforcement, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) has introduced legislation that "would repeal a 2016 law that hampered the Drug Enforcement Administration’s ability to regulate opioid distributors it suspects of misconduct." In a statement, McCaskill said: “Media reports indicate that this law has significantly affected the government’s ability to crack down on opioid distributors that are failing to meet their obligations and endangering our communities."