Vitter Demands Ethics Inquiry After Dems Float Obamacare-Prostitute Bill

The Louisiana Republican hits back after Democrats suggest a bill that highlights an awkward episode from Vitter’s past.

Key Conservative Stance: Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) cast one of the two votes against confirming New York Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton as secretary of state, although her qualifications for the job were not an issue. Vitter has opposed much of the Obama administration agenda.
National Journal
Patrick Reis
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Patrick Reis
Sept. 13, 2013, 11:54 a.m.

Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter wants the Sen­ate Eth­ics Com­mit­tee to launch an in­vest­ig­a­tion of Demo­crats Harry Re­id and Bar­bara Box­er, say­ing the two broke the Sen­ate’s code of con­duct when they floated le­gis­la­tion ref­er­en­cing Vit­ter’s al­leged past ren­dez­vous with pros­ti­tutes.

Vit­ter ap­peal to the Eth­ics pan­el is the latest move in a rap­idly es­cal­at­ing battle between the Louisi­ana Re­pub­lic­an and his col­leagues across the aisle.

Vit­ter in­furi­ated Demo­crats this week by hi­jack­ing a de­bate over an en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency bill with an amend­ment aimed at Obama­care. Un­der Vit­ter’s amend­ment, law­makers would no longer qual­i­fy for fed­er­al con­tri­bu­tions to help cov­er their health care costs.

It’s a prickly sub­ject for Demo­crats, and, ac­cord­ing to a Fri­day Politico re­port, they’re con­sid­er­ing the hard­est of hard­ball moves in re­sponse. The Demo­crats are re­portedly float­ing le­gis­la­tion that would ban sen­at­ors from get­ting gov­ern­ment con­tri­bu­tions for their health in­sur­ance costs if there is “prob­able cause” they so­li­cited pros­ti­tutes. The move is an ob­vi­ous swipe at Vit­ter, who has been sus­pec­ted of in­volve­ment with pros­ti­tutes since his 2007 en­tan­gle­ment in the “D.C. Madam” scan­dal.

But in his call for an Eth­ics in­vest­ig­a­tion, Vit­ter is ig­nor­ing the swipe by fo­cus­ing on an al­tern­at­ive draft of the le­gis­la­tion. Demo­crats re­portedly floated an al­tern­at­ive ver­sion of their bill that would deny cov­er­age con­tri­bu­tions to any law­maker who voted in sup­port of Vit­ter’s amend­ment. Vit­ter ar­gues that bill amounts to bribery, with law­makers of­fer­ing be­ne­fits — in this case, the fed­er­al cov­er­age con­tri­bu­tions — to law­makers in ex­change for their votes.

“This is at­temp­ted bribery, and the ex­act sort of be­ha­vi­or that the Sen­ate Eth­ics Com­mit­tee has pre­vi­ously con­demned,” he said in a let­ter to the com­mit­tee heads.

In his let­ter, Vit­ter notes that Box­er is in­deed the top Demo­crat on the Eth­ics pan­el. Should she be found com­pli­cit in the scheme, Vit­ter says that Box­er should be stripped of her Eth­ics Com­mit­tee mem­ber­ship.

Box­er, for her part, is not back­ing down either: “Sen­at­or Vit­ter has man­u­fac­tured a bizarre and phony at­tack that de­means the Sen­ate,” she said later Fri­day.

Demo­crats have not yet form­ally in­tro­duced any ver­sion of the anti-Vit­ter bill, and none may ever hit the floor, but its ap­pear­ance in press re­ports has put a spot­light on a part of Vit­ter’s ca­reer he would prefer re­main part of the past.

This post was up­dated at 5:25 p.m. Fri­day to in­clude Sen. Box­er’s re­sponse.

What We're Following See More »
FISHING EXPEDITION
Some Members Seek to Wrap Up Russia Investigations by Year’s End
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A growing number of key Republicans are sending this message to the leaders of the congressional committees investigating potential Trump campaign collusion with the Russians: Wrap it up soon. In the House and Senate, several Republicans who sit on key committees are starting to grumble that the investigations have spanned the better part of the past nine months, contending that the Democratic push to extend the investigation well into next year could amount to a fishing expedition."

Source:
WROTE LAW THAT WEAKENED OPIOID OVERSIGHT
Trump: Marino Withdrawing Nomination for Drug Czar
1 days ago
THE LATEST
Doesn’t Express Confidence in Marino
Trump to Declare Opioid Emergency Next Week
2 days ago
THE LATEST

After initially promising it in August, "President Trump said Monday that he will declare a national emergency next week to address the opioid epidemic." When asked, he also "declined to express confidence in Rep. Tom Marino (R-Pa.), his nominee for drug czar, in the wake of revelations that the lawmaker helped steer legislation making it harder to act against giant drug companies."

Source:
IN LIGHT OF 60 MINUTES REVELATIONS
Manchin Asks Trump to Drop Marino’s Nomination for Drug Czar
2 days ago
THE LATEST
WOULD OVERTURN MARINO LEGISLATION ON DRUG DISTRIBUTORS
McCaskill Will Introduce Bill in Response to “60 Minutes” Scoop
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

In the wake of Sunday's blockbuster 60 Minutes/Washington Post report on opioid regulation and enforcement, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) has introduced legislation that "would repeal a 2016 law that hampered the Drug Enforcement Administration’s ability to regulate opioid distributors it suspects of misconduct." In a statement, McCaskill said: “Media reports indicate that this law has significantly affected the government’s ability to crack down on opioid distributors that are failing to meet their obligations and endangering our communities."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login