Vitter Demands Ethics Inquiry After Dems Float Obamacare-Prostitute Bill

The Louisiana Republican hits back after Democrats suggest a bill that highlights an awkward episode from Vitter’s past.

Key Conservative Stance: Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) cast one of the two votes against confirming New York Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton as secretary of state, although her qualifications for the job were not an issue. Vitter has opposed much of the Obama administration agenda.
National Journal
Patrick Reis
See more stories about...
Patrick Reis
Sept. 13, 2013, 11:54 a.m.

Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter wants the Sen­ate Eth­ics Com­mit­tee to launch an in­vest­ig­a­tion of Demo­crats Harry Re­id and Bar­bara Box­er, say­ing the two broke the Sen­ate’s code of con­duct when they floated le­gis­la­tion ref­er­en­cing Vit­ter’s al­leged past ren­dez­vous with pros­ti­tutes.

Vit­ter ap­peal to the Eth­ics pan­el is the latest move in a rap­idly es­cal­at­ing battle between the Louisi­ana Re­pub­lic­an and his col­leagues across the aisle.

Vit­ter in­furi­ated Demo­crats this week by hi­jack­ing a de­bate over an en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency bill with an amend­ment aimed at Obama­care. Un­der Vit­ter’s amend­ment, law­makers would no longer qual­i­fy for fed­er­al con­tri­bu­tions to help cov­er their health care costs.

It’s a prickly sub­ject for Demo­crats, and, ac­cord­ing to a Fri­day Politico re­port, they’re con­sid­er­ing the hard­est of hard­ball moves in re­sponse. The Demo­crats are re­portedly float­ing le­gis­la­tion that would ban sen­at­ors from get­ting gov­ern­ment con­tri­bu­tions for their health in­sur­ance costs if there is “prob­able cause” they so­li­cited pros­ti­tutes. The move is an ob­vi­ous swipe at Vit­ter, who has been sus­pec­ted of in­volve­ment with pros­ti­tutes since his 2007 en­tan­gle­ment in the “D.C. Madam” scan­dal.

But in his call for an Eth­ics in­vest­ig­a­tion, Vit­ter is ig­nor­ing the swipe by fo­cus­ing on an al­tern­at­ive draft of the le­gis­la­tion. Demo­crats re­portedly floated an al­tern­at­ive ver­sion of their bill that would deny cov­er­age con­tri­bu­tions to any law­maker who voted in sup­port of Vit­ter’s amend­ment. Vit­ter ar­gues that bill amounts to bribery, with law­makers of­fer­ing be­ne­fits — in this case, the fed­er­al cov­er­age con­tri­bu­tions — to law­makers in ex­change for their votes.

“This is at­temp­ted bribery, and the ex­act sort of be­ha­vi­or that the Sen­ate Eth­ics Com­mit­tee has pre­vi­ously con­demned,” he said in a let­ter to the com­mit­tee heads.

In his let­ter, Vit­ter notes that Box­er is in­deed the top Demo­crat on the Eth­ics pan­el. Should she be found com­pli­cit in the scheme, Vit­ter says that Box­er should be stripped of her Eth­ics Com­mit­tee mem­ber­ship.

Box­er, for her part, is not back­ing down either: “Sen­at­or Vit­ter has man­u­fac­tured a bizarre and phony at­tack that de­means the Sen­ate,” she said later Fri­day.

Demo­crats have not yet form­ally in­tro­duced any ver­sion of the anti-Vit­ter bill, and none may ever hit the floor, but its ap­pear­ance in press re­ports has put a spot­light on a part of Vit­ter’s ca­reer he would prefer re­main part of the past.

This post was up­dated at 5:25 p.m. Fri­day to in­clude Sen. Box­er’s re­sponse.

What We're Following See More »
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
11 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
JOINS BUSHES, MCCAIN
Romney to Skip Convention
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

An aide to Mitt Romney confirmed to the Washington Post that the 2102 GOP nominee will not attend the Republican convention this year. He joins the two living Republican presidents, George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush, as well as 2008 nominee John McCain in skipping the event. Even among living Republican nominees, that leaves only Bob Dole who could conceivably show up. Dole did say in January that he'd prefer Trump to Ted Cruz, but his age (92) could keep him from attending.

Source:
CALIFORNIA MAKES IT 21
FDA to Ban All Tobacco Sales to Minors
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a long-awaiting new rule, the Food and Drug Administration will ban sale of all tobacco products—including e-cigarettes—to those under 18. The rule takes effect in 90 days. It's part of a larger package of regulations that "gives FDA authority to regulate—but not to ban—all tobacco products, from e-cigarettes to cigars and hookahs." Meanwhile, California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) signed a bill on Wednesday that would bump the legal age to buy all tobacco products from 18 to 21.

Source:
×