Reid Pushed White House to Appoint Energy Regulator Now Targeted by Conservatives

Sen. Harry Reid
National Journal
Amy Harder
See more stories about...
Amy Harder
Sept. 13, 2013, 12:29 p.m.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., per­suaded the White House to drop its nom­in­ee to lead an ob­scure but im­port­ant fed­er­al en­ergy agency and re­place him with an ap­pointee whose con­firm­a­tion pro­cess is now em­broiled in con­tro­versy, ac­cord­ing to the trade pub­lic­a­tion Trans­mis­sion Hub.

Re­id con­sidered Pres­id­ent Obama’s ori­gin­al choice for chair­man of the Fed­er­al En­ergy Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion, John Nor­ris, to be too “pro-coal,” the Hub re­por­ted Thursday. Obama then tapped Ron Binz, former chair of the Col­or­ado Pub­lic Util­it­ies Com­mis­sion, to be FERC chair­man.

Binz’s con­firm­a­tion hear­ing is sched­uled for Tues­day be­fore the Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee, and some fire­works are ex­pec­ted. Con­tro­versy over Binz’s nom­in­a­tion has es­cal­ated over the past couple of months, in­clud­ing a scath­ing Wall Street Journ­al ed­it­or­i­al in Ju­ly de­scrib­ing Binz as the “most im­port­ant and rad­ic­al Obama nom­in­ee you’ve nev­er heard of.”

The Journ­al ed­it­or­i­al board, along with con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans, some Demo­crats (in­clud­ing Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va.), and the coal in­dustry have cri­ti­cized Binz’s past work. This in­cludes a state law he helped write that aimed to shut down coal-fired power plants and his up­front philo­sophy of fa­vor­ing re­new­able en­ergy.

FERC over­sees the in­ter­state trans­mis­sion of elec­tri­city and oil and nat­ur­al-gas pipelines, as well as hy­dro­elec­tri­city pro­jects. It does not have any dir­ect in­flu­ence in power-gen­er­a­tion policy-mak­ing.

Obama first nom­in­ated Nor­ris to FERC in 2010. He is the second-most seni­or Demo­crat on the five-mem­ber pan­el after out­go­ing Chair­man Jon Welling­hoff.

Nor­ris was pre­vi­ously chief of staff to Ag­ri­cul­ture Sec­ret­ary Tom Vil­sack, a former gov­ernor of Iowa. Nor­ris’s roots are in Iowa; he was chair­man of the Iowa Util­it­ies Board and served on sev­er­al oth­er util­ity or­gan­iz­a­tions based in the state. He earned both his un­der­gradu­ate and gradu­ate de­grees in Iowa.

“Re­id’s chief of staff in­formed me that Re­id in­ter­vened with the White house to stop my ap­point­ment as chair be­cause, as told to me by his chief of staff, I was ‘too pro-coal,’ ” Nor­ris told Trans­mis­sion Hub.

Nor­ris denied the char­ac­ter­iz­a­tion by Re­id’s of­fice that he is pro-coal, ac­cord­ing to the Hub. He also told the pub­lic­a­tion that he be­lieves his nom­in­a­tion was blocked be­cause Re­id wanted a FERC chair­man from a West­ern state.

Kristen Orth­man, spokes­wo­man for Re­id’s of­fice, denied Nor­ris’s claims. “Un­for­tu­nately Com­mis­sion­er Nor­ris is wrongly blam­ing oth­ers and mak­ing ac­cus­a­tions that are not ac­cur­ate,” Orth­man said in an e-mail to Na­tion­al Journ­al

Mean­while, a group of en­vir­on­ment­al act­iv­ists has hired a Wash­ing­ton PR firm, VennSquared Com­mu­nic­a­tions, to cam­paign for Binz as he heads in­to what looks like a tough and testy Sen­ate con­firm­a­tion pro­cess.

On Thursday, the Wash­ing­ton Times re­por­ted on e-mails that re­vealed two former Re­id staffers — Chris Miller, who left the lead­er’s of­fice earli­er this year as his top en­ergy and en­vir­on­ment aide, and Kai An­der­son — also have helped with Binz’s con­firm­a­tion pro­cess.

This isn’t the first time Re­id has wiel­ded his in­flu­ence in a fight over an ob­scure en­ergy agency. He was in­stru­ment­al in hav­ing Gregory Jaczko, a former Re­id aide, ap­poin­ted chair­man of the Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion, a post Jaczko left last year after a con­tro­versy over his man­age­ment style.

Cor­al Dav­en­port con­trib­uted

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
25 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
25 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
25 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
25 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×