Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., persuaded the White House to drop its nominee to lead an obscure but important federal energy agency and replace him with an appointee whose confirmation process is now embroiled in controversy, according to the trade publication Transmission Hub.
Reid considered President Obama’s original choice for chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, John Norris, to be too “pro-coal,” the Hub reported Thursday. Obama then tapped Ron Binz, former chair of the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, to be FERC chairman.
Binz’s confirmation hearing is scheduled for Tuesday before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and some fireworks are expected. Controversy over Binz’s nomination has escalated over the past couple of months, including a scathing Wall Street Journal editorial in July describing Binz as the “most important and radical Obama nominee you’ve never heard of.”
The Journal editorial board, along with congressional Republicans, some Democrats (including Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va.), and the coal industry have criticized Binz’s past work. This includes a state law he helped write that aimed to shut down coal-fired power plants and his upfront philosophy of favoring renewable energy.
FERC oversees the interstate transmission of electricity and oil and natural-gas pipelines, as well as hydroelectricity projects. It does not have any direct influence in power-generation policy-making.
Obama first nominated Norris to FERC in 2010. He is the second-most senior Democrat on the five-member panel after outgoing Chairman Jon Wellinghoff.
Norris was previously chief of staff to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, a former governor of Iowa. Norris’s roots are in Iowa; he was chairman of the Iowa Utilities Board and served on several other utility organizations based in the state. He earned both his undergraduate and graduate degrees in Iowa.
“Reid’s chief of staff informed me that Reid intervened with the White house to stop my appointment as chair because, as told to me by his chief of staff, I was ‘too pro-coal,’ ” Norris told Transmission Hub.
Norris denied the characterization by Reid’s office that he is pro-coal, according to the Hub. He also told the publication that he believes his nomination was blocked because Reid wanted a FERC chairman from a Western state.
Kristen Orthman, spokeswoman for Reid’s office, denied Norris’s claims. “Unfortunately Commissioner Norris is wrongly blaming others and making accusations that are not accurate,” Orthman said in an e-mail to National Journal.
Meanwhile, a group of environmental activists has hired a Washington PR firm, VennSquared Communications, to campaign for Binz as he heads into what looks like a tough and testy Senate confirmation process.
On Thursday, the Washington Times reported on e-mails that revealed two former Reid staffers — Chris Miller, who left the leader’s office earlier this year as his top energy and environment aide, and Kai Anderson — also have helped with Binz’s confirmation process.
This isn’t the first time Reid has wielded his influence in a fight over an obscure energy agency. He was instrumental in having Gregory Jaczko, a former Reid aide, appointed chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a post Jaczko left last year after a controversy over his management style.
Coral Davenport contributed
What We're Following See More »
Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:
- Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
- Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
- They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
- One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”
At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”