Navy Yard Shooting Talk Turns to Guns, Politics Before It’s Even Over

A U.S. Park Police helicopter removes a man in a basket from the Washington Navy Yard on Monday.
National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros, Patrick Reis and Lucia Graves
See more stories about...
Matt Vasilogambros Patrick Reis Lucia Graves
Sept. 16, 2013, 7:36 a.m.

The iden­tity of the Navy Yard shoot­er — or shoot­ers — was un­known. The cas­u­alty count re­mained in flux. There was no in­form­a­tion on what weapons were used or where they came from. But pun­dits were already up on their col­lect­ive soap­box.

A mem­ber of Rus­sia’s par­lia­ment­ary for­eign af­fairs com­mit­tee sought to cap­it­al­ize on the situ­ation, call­ing Monday’s tragedy “a clear con­firm­a­tion of “Amer­ic­an ex­cep­tion­al­ism.” Rus­sia’s par­lia­ment­ary for­eign af­fairs chief, Alexey Pushkov, tweeted out a string of in­sults, as Buzzfeed first re­por­ted:

“A new shootout at Navy headquar­ters in Wash­ing­ton — a lone gun­man and 7 corpses. Nobody’s even sur­prised any­more. A clear con­firm­a­tion of Amer­ic­an ex­cep­tion­al­ism.”

Новая стрельба у штаба ВМС в Вашингтоне - одинокий стрелок и 7 трупов. Никто уже не удивлен. Наглядное подтверждение “амер.исключительности”

— Алексей Пушков (@Alexey_Pushkov) Septem­ber 16, 2013

He went on to say the U.S. should part with the no­tion of Amer­ic­an ex­cep­tion­al­ism, ar­guing it “con­tra­dicts the prin­ciples of equal rights” and “smells of polit­ic­al ra­cism.” His gloat­ing comes after the White House op­ted to ac­cept a Krem­lin pro­pos­al to avert a strike on Syr­ia.

Mean­while, CNN con­trib­ut­or Dav­id Frum was quick to pivot to policy and at­tack pro-gun ad­voc­ates. 

Frum sar­castic­ally said “it’s im­port­ant that we re­spect the feel­ings of gun en­thu­si­asts”, fol­lowed by a list of satir­ic­al “rules of etiquette” to “help the post-shoot­ing con­ver­sa­tion to pro­ceed in ap­pro­pri­ate ways.”

Rule 1: It is “ghoul­ish” to sug­gest in any way that the easy avail­ab­il­ity of guns might in any way en­able gun slaughter.

— dav­id­frum (@dav­id­frum) Septem­ber 16, 2013

Rule 2: Gun crime in the pres­id­ent’s ho­met­own proves that guns any­where else are no fit top­ic of con­ver­sa­tion.

— dav­id­frum (@dav­id­frum) Septem­ber 16, 2013

Rule 3: All gun own­ers are to be com­pli­men­ted as re­spons­ible and law-abid­ing un­til they per­son­ally have hurt them­selves or some­body else

— dav­id­frum (@dav­id­frum) Septem­ber 16, 2013

Rule 4: Any at­tempt to stop mass cas­u­alty shoot­ings is “polit­ic­al.” Al­low­ing them to con­tin­ue is”non-polit­ic­al.”

— dav­id­frum (@dav­id­frum) Septem­ber 16, 2013

Rule 5: Gun own­er­ship is es­sen­tial to free­dom, as in Ser­bia & Guatem­ala. Gun re­stric­tions lead to tyranny, as in Aus­tralia & Canada.

— dav­id­frum (@dav­id­frum) Septem­ber 16, 2013

Frum’s tweets drew a sim­il­arly polit­ic­al re­sponse from Fox News com­ment­at­or Katie Pav­lich, who noted the shoot­ing happened in a gun-free zone. In past shoot­ings, gun-pro­lif­er­a­tion ad­voc­ates have said that gun con­trol policies — in­clud­ing gun-free zones — ex­acer­bate mass shoot­ings, by draw­ing as­sail­ants to areas where they do not ex­pect oth­ers to be armed.

In a gun free zone, again RT @dav­id­frum: An­oth­er mass cas­u­alty shoot­ing, this time at Wash­ing­ton Navy Yard. (1)

— Katie Pav­lich (@KatiePav­lich) Septem­ber 16, 2013

Dave Zir­in, the sports ed­it­or of The Na­tion, a lib­er­al magazine, sug­ges­ted that the lack of gun con­trol could have al­lowed the shoot­ing to take place.

Shoot­er(s) in Nav­al Yard re­por­ted to have AR-15s. In DMV, there’ve been con­stant ra­dio ads for people to buy AR-15s NOW b4 new regs come in.

— Dave Zir­in (@Edgeof­Sports) Septem­ber 16, 2013

No idea where/how shoot­er(s) got AR-15s but it’s eer­ie they’re us­ing the gun that com­mer­cials loc­ally are hard­core push­ing people to buy.

— Dave Zir­in (@Edgeof­Sports) Septem­ber 16, 2013

Jim Treach­er, a writer at the con­ser­vat­ive web­site The Daily Caller, mocked the idea that gun-con­trol policies can avoid mass shoot­ings.

Why is it that mass shoot­ings tend to hap­pen in places with the strict­est gun laws? In gun-free zones? And why aren’t we sup­posed to ask?

— Jim Treach­er (@jtLOL) Septem­ber 16, 2013

The con­ver­sa­tion has be­come a reg­u­lar com­pan­ion of Amer­ica’s mass shoot­ings, and its cycle has grown fa­mil­i­ar. Dur­ing the tra­gedies, most politi­cians prefer to re­main apolit­ic­al, con­fin­ing their re­marks to “sym­path­ies” or “thoughts and pray­ers.”

But among pun­dits, talk turns to polit­ics, with both sides of the gun con­trol de­bate launch­ing in­to everything from ar­gu­ments to vit­ri­ol.

What We're Following See More »
27TH AMENDMENT
Congress Can’t Seem Not to Pay Itself
43 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Far Away from Cleveland is the California GOP Staying?
1 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."

ATTORNEY MAY RELEASE THEM ANYWAY
SCOTUS Will Not Allow ‘DC Madam’ Phone Records to Be Released
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Anyone looking forward to seeing some boldfaced names on the client list of the late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the "DC Madam," will have to wait a little longer. "The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not intervene to allow" the release of her phone records, "despite one of her former attorneys claiming the records are “very relevant” to the presidential election. Though he has repeatedly threatened to release the records if courts do not modify a 2007 restraining order, Montgomery Blair Sibley tells U.S. News he’s not quite sure what he now will do."

Source:
DOWN TO THE WIRE
Sanders Looks to Right the Ship in Indiana
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

Hillary Clinton may have the Democratic nomination sewn up, but Bernie Sanders apparently isn't buying it. Buoyed by a poll showing them in a "virtual tie," Sanders is "holding three rallies on the final day before the state primary and hoping to pull off a win after a tough week of election losses and campaign layoffs." 

Source:
‘SPOOKED’ IN NORTH DAKOTA
Cruz Delegates Having Second Thoughts?
22 hours ago
THE LATEST

As unbound delegates pledged to Ted Cruz watch him "struggle to tread water in a primary increasingly dominated by Trump, many of them, wary of a bitter convention battle that could rend the party at its seams, are rethinking their commitment to the Texas senator."

Source:
×