Navy Yard Shooting Talk Turns to Guns, Politics Before It’s Even Over

A U.S. Park Police helicopter removes a man in a basket from the Washington Navy Yard on Monday.
National Journal
Lucia Graves, Patrick Reis and Matt Vasilogambros
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Lucia Graves and Patrick Reis and Matt Vasilogambros
Sept. 16, 2013, 7:36 a.m.

The iden­tity of the Navy Yard shoot­er — or shoot­ers — was un­known. The cas­u­alty count re­mained in flux. There was no in­form­a­tion on what weapons were used or where they came from. But pun­dits were already up on their col­lect­ive soap­box.

A mem­ber of Rus­sia’s par­lia­ment­ary for­eign af­fairs com­mit­tee sought to cap­it­al­ize on the situ­ation, call­ing Monday’s tragedy “a clear con­firm­a­tion of “Amer­ic­an ex­cep­tion­al­ism.” Rus­sia’s par­lia­ment­ary for­eign af­fairs chief, Alexey Pushkov, tweeted out a string of in­sults, as Buzzfeed first re­por­ted:

“A new shootout at Navy headquar­ters in Wash­ing­ton — a lone gun­man and 7 corpses. Nobody’s even sur­prised any­more. A clear con­firm­a­tion of Amer­ic­an ex­cep­tion­al­ism.”

Новая стрельба у штаба ВМС в Вашингтоне - одинокий стрелок и 7 трупов. Никто уже не удивлен. Наглядное подтверждение “амер.исключительности”

— Алексей Пушков (@Alexey_Pushkov) Septem­ber 16, 2013

He went on to say the U.S. should part with the no­tion of Amer­ic­an ex­cep­tion­al­ism, ar­guing it “con­tra­dicts the prin­ciples of equal rights” and “smells of polit­ic­al ra­cism.” His gloat­ing comes after the White House op­ted to ac­cept a Krem­lin pro­pos­al to avert a strike on Syr­ia.

Mean­while, CNN con­trib­ut­or Dav­id Frum was quick to pivot to policy and at­tack pro-gun ad­voc­ates. 

Frum sar­castic­ally said “it’s im­port­ant that we re­spect the feel­ings of gun en­thu­si­asts”, fol­lowed by a list of satir­ic­al “rules of etiquette” to “help the post-shoot­ing con­ver­sa­tion to pro­ceed in ap­pro­pri­ate ways.”

Rule 1: It is “ghoul­ish” to sug­gest in any way that the easy avail­ab­il­ity of guns might in any way en­able gun slaughter.

— dav­id­frum (@dav­id­frum) Septem­ber 16, 2013

Rule 2: Gun crime in the pres­id­ent’s ho­met­own proves that guns any­where else are no fit top­ic of con­ver­sa­tion.

— dav­id­frum (@dav­id­frum) Septem­ber 16, 2013

Rule 3: All gun own­ers are to be com­pli­men­ted as re­spons­ible and law-abid­ing un­til they per­son­ally have hurt them­selves or some­body else

— dav­id­frum (@dav­id­frum) Septem­ber 16, 2013

Rule 4: Any at­tempt to stop mass cas­u­alty shoot­ings is “polit­ic­al.” Al­low­ing them to con­tin­ue is”non-polit­ic­al.”

— dav­id­frum (@dav­id­frum) Septem­ber 16, 2013

Rule 5: Gun own­er­ship is es­sen­tial to free­dom, as in Ser­bia & Guatem­ala. Gun re­stric­tions lead to tyranny, as in Aus­tralia & Canada.

— dav­id­frum (@dav­id­frum) Septem­ber 16, 2013

Frum’s tweets drew a sim­il­arly polit­ic­al re­sponse from Fox News com­ment­at­or Katie Pav­lich, who noted the shoot­ing happened in a gun-free zone. In past shoot­ings, gun-pro­lif­er­a­tion ad­voc­ates have said that gun con­trol policies — in­clud­ing gun-free zones — ex­acer­bate mass shoot­ings, by draw­ing as­sail­ants to areas where they do not ex­pect oth­ers to be armed.

In a gun free zone, again RT @dav­id­frum: An­oth­er mass cas­u­alty shoot­ing, this time at Wash­ing­ton Navy Yard. (1)

— Katie Pav­lich (@KatiePav­lich) Septem­ber 16, 2013

Dave Zir­in, the sports ed­it­or of The Na­tion, a lib­er­al magazine, sug­ges­ted that the lack of gun con­trol could have al­lowed the shoot­ing to take place.

Shoot­er(s) in Nav­al Yard re­por­ted to have AR-15s. In DMV, there’ve been con­stant ra­dio ads for people to buy AR-15s NOW b4 new regs come in.

— Dave Zir­in (@Edgeof­Sports) Septem­ber 16, 2013

No idea where/how shoot­er(s) got AR-15s but it’s eer­ie they’re us­ing the gun that com­mer­cials loc­ally are hard­core push­ing people to buy.

— Dave Zir­in (@Edgeof­Sports) Septem­ber 16, 2013

Jim Treach­er, a writer at the con­ser­vat­ive web­site The Daily Caller, mocked the idea that gun-con­trol policies can avoid mass shoot­ings.

Why is it that mass shoot­ings tend to hap­pen in places with the strict­est gun laws? In gun-free zones? And why aren’t we sup­posed to ask?

— Jim Treach­er (@jtLOL) Septem­ber 16, 2013

The con­ver­sa­tion has be­come a reg­u­lar com­pan­ion of Amer­ica’s mass shoot­ings, and its cycle has grown fa­mil­i­ar. Dur­ing the tra­gedies, most politi­cians prefer to re­main apolit­ic­al, con­fin­ing their re­marks to “sym­path­ies” or “thoughts and pray­ers.”

But among pun­dits, talk turns to polit­ics, with both sides of the gun con­trol de­bate launch­ing in­to everything from ar­gu­ments to vit­ri­ol.

What We're Following See More »
FORMER GOVERNOR, AMBASSADOR TO CHINA
Jon Huntsman in Line to be #2 at State
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS
SHOW OF UNITY
Ellison Bringing New DNC Chair Perez To Trump’s Address
4 hours ago
BREAKING
CASE TO CARRY ON
DOJ Drops Claim Against Texas’s Voter ID Law
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Department of Justice "is dropping a discrimination claim against a Texas law that required voters to present identification at the polls." The case will continue to carry on with private groups who filed the lawsuit. The DOJ dropped the claim because Texas is planning to "cure the deficiencies" with the law, according to a draft copy of the dismissal motion the DOJ sent to the Campaign Legal Center. Texas Governor Jim Abbott tweeted a picture of a headline sharing the information with a caption saying "It's a new day in D.C."

Source:
TROUBLE LOOMING?
Durbin Says Government Shutdown Possible
6 hours ago
THE LATEST
AT LEAST 19 TODAY
Jewish Community Keeps Receiving Threats
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login