Could the Time Be Right for Mandatory-Sentencing Reform?

Attorney General Eric Holder testifies at a Senate Appropriations subcommittee as lawmakers examine the budget for the Justice Department, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 6, 2013. Holder said Wednesday that a better balance needs to be struck between press freedom and safeguarding national secrets in the wake of aggressive government leak probes that have angered the news media.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
Sept. 16, 2013, 5 p.m.

Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., couldn’t be farther apart on the par­tis­an spec­trum, but their al­li­ance over man­dat­ory-sen­ten­cing laws rep­res­ents the grow­ing sup­port for re­form.

On Wed­nes­day, the Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee will hold a hear­ing on the Paul-Leahy bill — dubbed the Justice Safety Valve Act of 2013 — which gives judges great­er flex­ib­il­ity in de­part­ing from man­dat­ory min­im­ums when sen­ten­cing fed­er­al crimes. An­oth­er bill, sponsored by a second polit­ic­al odd couple — Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Mike Lee, R-Utah — re­duces man­dat­ory min­im­ums in non­vi­ol­ent drug cases.

In­deed, lib­er­als and con­ser­vat­ives have been com­ing to­geth­er around the is­sue of man­dat­ory sen­tences. Last month, At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Eric Hold­er an­nounced that the Justice De­part­ment would seek to scale back its pur­suit of man­dat­ory min­im­um sen­tences for low-level drug of­fend­ers.

Lib­er­al crit­ics of man­dat­ory-sen­ten­cing laws also say they per­petu­ate ra­cial dis­par­it­ies in the crim­in­al-justice sys­tem. Hold­er agrees that “un­war­ran­ted dis­par­it­ies are far too com­mon.” Con­ser­vat­ives have poin­ted to the cost of man­dat­ory sen­ten­cing and pris­on over­crowding.

Hold­er’s an­nounce­ment won him praise from con­ser­vat­ive corners. Former Arkan­sas Gov. Mike Hucka­bee tweeted, “Fi­nally found something I can agree with Eric Hold­er on — sen­ten­cing too many people to pris­on for non­vi­ol­ent drug crimes.”

Paul, a top wit­ness testi­fy­ing at Wed­nes­day’s hear­ing, has framed man­dat­ory min­im­um sen­ten­cing as re­flect­ing one of “the biggest prob­lems in Wash­ing­ton … the idea that there should be a Wash­ing­ton-knows-best, one-size-fits-all ap­proach to all prob­lems.”

Ju­lie Stew­art, founder and pres­id­ent of Fam­il­ies Against Man­dat­ory Min­im­ums, said the mo­mentum for sen­ten­cing re­form is great­er now than dur­ing the early 1990s when Con­gress first held hear­ings and even­tu­ally passed the cur­rent safety-valve pro­vi­sions.

Law­makers have long told Stew­art that they would spend however much money was needed on in­car­cer­a­tion. “I def­in­itely heard that for years, and I don’t any­more,” she said. “In some ways, the se­quester has prob­ably helped us, be­cause there just isn’t that un­lim­ited stream of money any­more.”

The an­ti­s­pend­ing cli­mate has con­trib­uted to cre­at­ing a ripe en­vir­on­ment for re­form. An­ti­tax ad­voc­ate Grover Nor­quist backs the Paul-Leahy meas­ure.

Stew­art said, “The in­terest in this bloated gov­ern­ment pro­gram that, really, the tea-party types have kind of brought a Re­pub­lic­an per­spect­ive to, and when you link it with people like Sen­at­or Leahy who have been par­tic­u­larly op­posed to man­dat­ory min­im­ums, … that’s just a win­ning com­bin­a­tion of bring­ing the Left and Right to­geth­er.” She ad­ded, “It’s cre­ated a new op­por­tun­ity that hasn’t ex­is­ted be­fore…. It’s no longer this third rail that Re­pub­lic­ans won’t touch or Demo­crats won’t touch.”

Between 2006 and 2012, the num­ber of in­mates in the cus­tody of the Bur­eau of Pris­ons grew 13 per­cent, ac­cord­ing to March 2013 testi­mony by Justice De­part­ment In­spect­or Gen­er­al Mi­chael Horow­itz. BOP re­ques­ted $6.9 bil­lion for 2013, ac­count­ing for 26 per­cent of DOJ’s over­all budget; 15 years ago, the bur­eau’s budget was $3.1 bil­lion, or 14 per­cent of the Justice De­part­ment’s over­all budget.

But the need to deal with­in tight budget con­straints isn’t enough to push this kind of re­form over the fin­ish line, ex­perts say.

“The fact that crime is down pretty broadly is a factor,” said Jef­frey Miron, Har­vard Uni­versity seni­or lec­turer on eco­nom­ics and a seni­or fel­low at the Cato In­sti­tute. “It lets people be a little more com­fort­able with not be­ing so ag­gress­ive on crim­in­al-justice pro­ced­ures.”

The FBI re­por­ted that vi­ol­ent crime in 2011 dropped by 4 per­cent for the fifth year in a row, while the murder rate dropped by 1.9 per­cent.

“For con­ser­vat­ives who are some­what liber­tari­an or be­lieve in the small-gov­ern­ment stuff they talk about, the budget­ary as­pects might cer­tainly be rel­ev­ant,” Miron said. “But I think the movers and shakers think in­car­cer­a­tion is ex­cess­ive; they may just be able to be a little more per­suas­ive now be­cause of the budget­ary stuff.”

It also helps that there isn’t an or­gan­ized op­pos­i­tion to scal­ing back man­dat­ory sen­ten­cing. Stew­art says she can’t point to a spe­cif­ic group, at least not yet, that op­poses her group’s call for re­form.

On the oth­er end, a num­ber of groups rep­res­ent­ing judges and at­tor­neys have been sup­port­ive of re­du­cing man­dat­ory sen­ten­cing. In a un­an­im­ous Au­gust vote, the U.S. Sen­ten­cing Com­mis­sion agreed to make work­ing with Con­gress on a list of re­com­mend­a­tions re­gard­ing fed­er­al man­dat­ory min­im­um pen­al­ties — in­clud­ing ex­pand­ing the safety-valve pro­vi­sion — its top pri­or­ity. In a 2010 Sen­ten­cing Com­mis­sion sur­vey of Dis­trict Court judges, 62 per­cent said the man­dat­ory sen­tence was too high for all of­fenses that car­ried a man­dat­ory min­im­um.

As of press time, the Ju­di­cial Con­fer­ence of the United States had not taken an of­fi­cial po­s­i­tion on the pending Sen­ate le­gis­la­tion, but the group has long op­posed man­dat­ory min­im­um sen­ten­cing. Testi­fy­ing be­fore a House com­mit­tee in 2009, a rep­res­ent­at­ive of the con­fer­ence’s Com­mit­tee on Crim­in­al Law, Chief Judge Ju­lie Carnes of Geor­gia, said man­dat­ory sen­ten­cing has be­come “a blunt and in­flex­ible tool.”

A com­pan­ion meas­ure from Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Bobby Scott, D-Va., has been in­tro­duced in the House. But per­haps the biggest obstacle to the pas­sage of a meas­ure may be time — the House still has to deal with a laun­dry list of fisc­al crises this fall.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×