Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn., the ranking member on the House Agriculture Committee and its former chairman, may be one of the most underestimated people ever to lead a congressional panel.
When Peterson became the panel’s ranking member in 2005, he was best known for piloting his own plane; for hunting trips that produced the exotic birds and animal trophies in his office; and for the lawmaker rock bands he started in the 1990s, featuring the likes of then-Rep. Joe Scarborough.
But Peterson did not have a reputation as a legislator. As one lobbyist put it, “That goofball will say anything to the press.”
Peterson, 69, is indeed the most likely person on the Agriculture Committee to tell a grateful media what’s really happening, including revealing more about what House Speaker John Boehner is thinking about the farm bill than Boehner himself or other Republicans ever do.
But a goofball, Peterson is not. In his leadership roles, Peterson has proven to be like the proverbial country lawyer who shocks the city lawyer with his skill.
“There were people in my party who were skeptical of me taking that position. I was seen as a renegade, a maverick,” Peterson said. But he added that he had been quietly learning the process, and that before he rose in the leadership, “it wasn’t my position to stick my head out.”
In 2008 Peterson managed the most popular farm and nutrition bill that Congress has passed in decades and got the full cooperation of then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, R-Calif., even though she is from San Francisco and seemingly a world away from Peterson in culture and style.
It was Peterson and Pelosi who worked out just how far they could go in the spending mix between farm subsidies and food stamps and still pass the bill. And when there was not enough money for some other programs that Peterson considered vital, he announced one morning that he would trim crop-insurance subsidies to get the funding he needed.
With a wave of his hand, Peterson delivered a bigger cut to crop insurance than any of the reductions the program’s loud urban critics had achieved. The crop insurers could fight people who didn’t know the details of how their industry worked, but they couldn’t fight the chairman when he said farmers would still get their insurance if the companies and agents didn’t make so much money.
Peterson became a certified public accountant at age 23 and attributes his ability to master complex issues to his accounting background. “What we do in agriculture is related to numbers, to complicated programs,” he said.
Peterson’s accounting background also came in handy when he had to write the futures and derivatives title of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which is administered by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The committee has jurisdiction over the CFTC.
“When I became chairman, I dug into things. I spent a lot of time educating myself, especially on the CFTC stuff,” he said.
The House Agriculture Committee, whose authority over the futures industry goes back to the days when futures were in agricultural commodities and mining, had control of only one title of the Dodd-Frank bill, and Peterson did not succeed in banning credit default swaps, which he considers “unfettered gambling.”
But he wrote a tough title, and an army of futures-industry lobbyists have been fighting its implementation ever since. Peterson said he took some advice from the industry when he was writing the bill. However, he said “no” so many times, “they gave up on me, figured out they could not influence me,” and sought help from other lawmakers.
Peterson and House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas, R-Okla., are in agreement on farm policy, but not on Dodd-Frank.
Lucas has urged the CFTC to go slow on implementation, while Peterson fears that the agency has gone too slowly. Peterson hopes “we don’t have another situation with another meltdown.”
This year he has turned his attention to food stamps and commodity policy. Peterson believes the food-stamp program needs to be analyzed and updated at the federal level to reflect inflation, and that waivers for states should be eliminated so that the program would be the same nationwide.
But he has not persuaded the Republicans to rewrite the program with those changes.
“There is a lot of hypocrisy about this,” he said, with many GOP governors asking for waivers so that they can provide federal benefits to people who would not otherwise get them. He opposes large-scale cuts advocated by House Majority Leader Eric Cantor as “just politics.”
On commodity policy, Peterson, like Lucas, believes that the program for crop farmers needs to be based on target prices, and they agreed on a solution that the House has passed. But the measure will face difficult negotiations with the Senate, if a conference is held.
Lucas and Peterson share memories of difficult times in agriculture. Peterson grew up on a farm in the western Minnesota district that he now represents. He raised champion cattle in 4-H and, in 1962, sold them and used the money to plant potatoes. The crop failed, and Peterson had to take a job mowing ditches to earn enough to start college at Moorhead State University. His father later rented the farmland, making it impossible for his son to return.
Peterson said he almost flunked out before giving up the band he was in. But he excelled in accounting and got a job working at an accounting firm, passed the CPA exam, and at 23 bought the Detroit Lakes firm where he had been working.
Somehow politics always beckoned. He had been head of the student council in high school, got involved in Democratic politics in college through a roommate, and was going to run for president of the state Jaycees, a civic group, when “some of my buddies talked me into running for the state Senate instead,” he said.
Peterson liked politics, but the legislative sessions took him to St. Paul during tax season. He decided that if he was going to be in politics, it had to be full time, so he would run for the U.S. House. However, it took him five electoral tries before he won office in 1990. Peterson had several rough elections in the early years, but has not had strong opposition since then. This year, conservatives have run ads against him, calling him a big spender. Peterson said recently that he found the ads so annoying he is inclined to run again.
Peterson’s district votes Republican for president, and Peterson has prided himself on his bipartisanship — until now. When he voted against the Republican bill that passed the farm program but excluded food stamps, Peterson said he took a turn toward partisanship. Although he has prided himself on understanding the other side, he now declines to speculate on where things are headed, saying only the situation in the House “can’t get any worse.”
“I am just a country boy, and I am doing the best I can,” he said.
It’s a line that should make any city slicker wary.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."