A high-ranking North Korean official on Wednesday said his government wants to reinvigorate multinational negotiations over its nuclear-weapons program, but only if there are no preconditions, the Yonhap News Agency reported on Wednesday.
“We are ready to enter the six-party talks without preconditions,” First Vice Foreign Minister Kim Kye Gwan said at a Beijing conference focused on reviving the nuclear negotiations.
“Attaching preconditions to our offer of dialogue would cause mistrust,” said Kim, the North’s senior nuclear negotiator.
The six-nation talks encompass China, Japan, the two Koreas, Russia and the United States, which last held formal talks in December 2008. In the years since, Pyongyang has dramatically advanced its nuclear-weapons work, carrying out several long-range missile tests, detonating two atomic devices and expanding its fissile-material production capabilities.
Washington, Seoul and Tokyo say they are not interested in returning to the aid-for-denuclearization negotiations with the North until it first makes a concrete demonstration of its willingness to permanently end its nuclear-weapons development. North Korea objects to any such conditions being placed around negotiations.
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Wednesday told the conference the nuclear negotiations should quickly be resumed, Yonhap separately reported.
The ministry organized the forum in the hopes that all six-party participants would send their nuclear negotiators for semi-formal talks around options for reinvigorating the dialogue. However, Japan, South Korea and the United States declined to send senior officials.
The U.S. embassy in Beijing sent an official to observe the proceedings, the Associated Press reported.
Beijing reportedly has floated a proposal to Seoul, Tokyo and Washington to offer Pyongyang some new nonaggression assurances. However, the three allies have responded coolly to the idea, according to Kyodo News.
North Korea justifies its nuclear-weapons work by maintaining it is threatened by the much-greater U.S. arsenal, as well as the United States’ military alliances with Japan and South Korea.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."