From the food stamps bill on the House floor this week to farmland conservation and commodities regulation, there is very little about the nation’s food supply that the House Committee on Agriculture doesn’t help govern. In its latest Special Issue, National Journal Daily examines the changing nature of the committee, the people who run it and the issues and challenges they face. Click here to see the issue
Searching for the Future of Food
Serving on the House Agriculture Committee may be little fun these days, and even less politically rewarding. The fight to renew the five-year farm bill — dominated by how much to cut from the food-stamp program — has been acrimonious. Meanwhile, the heavy involvement of House leadership, differences over agriculture and nutrition policy, and the declining ability of individual members to influence legislation generally have made a seat on the panel less attractive.
Chairman: ‘The Safety Net Still Has to Exist’
Rep. Frank Lucas comes from the tough world of Oklahoma farming, but running the House Agriculture Committee is no easy job, either. Bonus: meet the 16 people closest to the chairman.
Don’t Underestimate Collin Peterson
Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn. may be one of the most underestimated people ever to lead a congressional panel. But Peterson has proven to be like the proverbial country lawyer who shocks the city lawyer with his skill.
Fight Over Food Stamps Dominates Farm Bill
When House lawmakers take to the floor this week to address a bill that will set funding levels for the food-stamp program, they will be finishing a fight that has torn the traditional five-year farm bill in two. Literally.
The Two Sides of Crop Insurance
Depending on whom you talk to, the crop-insurance program is either an essential risk-management tool that helps farmers when disaster strikes or a Robin Hood-in-reverse scheme that takes from the poor and gives to the rich.
The Shrinking State of Farmland Conservation
The number of acres the government idles for conservation is contracting, and that’s caused as much by market forces — or “nature,” as one agriculture advocate put it — as it is by anything Congress has done.
Sugar Growers Reap Sweeter Results Than Dairy Farmers
Two major lobbying fights over agriculture have taken place between growers and users, with vastly different results.
Congress is Paying More Attention to Fruits and Vegetables
For years, specialty crops — generally defined as fruits, vegetables, and tree nuts — have been treated as afterthoughts in agriculture policy, but with each farm bill comes a little more help.
It’s Corny, But Don’t Call the Ag Committee
The renewable-fuel standard has a profound impact on the agriculture industry. Yet it isn’t controlled by the House Agriculture Committee.
It’s North Versus South on Commodities Debate
Differing allegiances and philosophies among House and Senate Ag Committee leaders have led to a House commodities section of the farm bill that appeals to Southerners and a Senate version that is more palatable to Northerners.
Protections, Regulation at Play in CFTC Reauthorization
Lawmakers’ desire to respond to the failures of MF Global and Peregrine Financial, and lingering disputes over Dodd-Frank, could be a part of the debate.
When Michelle Obama Says ‘Let’s Move’”¦
The first lady has made childhood nutrition one of her signature policy priorities — and it seems to be working.
For staff profiles, graphics and more, see the full issue.
What We're Following See More »
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.
UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”