WASHINGTON — Investigators warned last week of a potential national-security threat at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission resulting from a policy that does not penalize employees who fail to disclose criminal and financial improprieties.
The NRC inspector general urged the agency to establish “consequences” for employees who fail to report circumstances such as past arrests and chronic financial debt. It is unclear whether agency leaders plan to create disciplinary procedures for related lapses by its personnel, who can receive access to sensitive data or nuclear substances in the course of their work.
NRC employees “rarely comply with personnel reporting responsibilities” that require them in part to disclose if they are alcoholics or dealers of illegal drugs, the inspector general said in a report dated Sept. 12. The authors examined materials from 35 re-investigations of NRC employees, and found over two dozen files with evidence of incidents that “should have been reported” to NRC security officials, the document states.
“Certain types of information must be assiduously protected,” the auditors warned. “When a person’s actions show evidence of unreliability or untrustworthiness, questions arise [about] whether the person can be relied on to protect classified information.”
Leaks of such data can result in death and “irreparable damage” to national security, they wrote. The report does not detail precise circumstances under which commission employees might receive access to sensitive materials.
The inspector general separately advised the commission to begin regularly reminding staffers of potentially compromising situations they must disclose. Employees presently only receive such a rundown immediately after are hired, according to the assessment.
Making sure that personnel take note of the reminders is also crucial, the report adds. “NRC issues many announcements,” but the agency “does not track whether employees are actually reading the announcements issued,” auditors said.
Senior NRC officials last week expressed “general agreement” with the auditors’ recommendations, but the report does not indicate whether they plan to implement the moves. The IG office on Sept. 12 asked the commission’s operations chief to report within 30 days on any actions being taken in response to the findings.
What We're Following See More »
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.
UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”