When asked at a Heritage Foundation event on Thursday what the House strategy would be if the Senate rejects House Republicans’ continuing resolution that defunds Obamacare, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, referenced New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick. “Even Belichick doesn’t script the whole game,” he said. “We’re focused on the vote tomorrow; “¦ what happens down the road, we’ll see.”
The problem with the sports metaphor — besides the fact that we’re talking about the U.S. government, economy, and health care system, not the outcome of a football game — is that unlike the Patriots, House Republicans do know how the other team is going to play. What doesn’t seem to be scripted is what the House Republican strategy will be when the Senate inevitably punts the CR back to them.
Rep. Tom Graves, R-Ga., a main contributor to the House bill, agreed with Jordan’s assessment, saying the question involved too many hypotheticals. “In the next 11 days, we’re going to stay focused on our objective.”
In reality though, the way those 11 days will unfold is largely scripted. We know that the House plans to vote on a bill to continue funding the government but defunding the health care law Friday. The bill is destined for failure in the Senate; Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday, “Any bill that defunds Obamacare is dead. Dead.” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, angered many Republicans Wednesday when he admitted he did not have enough votes to pass the defunding bill in the Senate. “Harry Reid will no doubt try to strip the defund language from the continuing resolution, and right now he likely has the votes to do so,” he said in a statement. “At that point, House Republicans must stand firm, hold their ground, and continue to listen to the American people.”
A Senate CR that eliminates the defunding provision would then have to be sent back the House. What remains unclear — and what seems to be unclear to House Republicans as well — is what their next move would be.
Pushed to consider the seemingly inevitable hypothetical, Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, refused to go into specifics. “Speaker [John] Boehner said there are other options,” he said. “I’m not going to lay them all out on the table right now.”
Conservative members of the House maintain that it is up to Reid and President Obama to make the next play. But with the Senate position clear, and Obama’s veto threat already stated, what remains unclear is what the House plans to do next.
With time running out to avoid a government shutdown, House Republicans should really start practicing their two-minute drill.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."