Threats to Syrian Christians Heighten Concerns in Congress About Aiding Rebels

Rep. Chris Van Hollen
©2011 Richard A. Bloom
Sara Sorcher
Sept. 22, 2013, 8:54 a.m.

Mem­bers of Con­gress know that Syr­i­an strong­man Bashar al-As­sad is the bad guy, but they’re in­creas­ingly wor­ried about top­pling him from power, after Chris­ti­an or­gan­iz­a­tions have gal­van­ized Amer­ica’s re­li­gious base.

Rep. Chris Van Hol­len, D-Md., wor­ries that the pres­ence of ex­trem­ist groups linked to al-Qaida with­in the frag­men­ted Syr­i­an op­pos­i­tion poses a “dir­ect threat” to re­li­gious minor­it­ies there, in­clud­ing Chris­ti­ans, who make up about 10 per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion in a coun­try home to an­cient bib­lic­al scenes such as the Dam­as­cus road on which Paul had his con­ver­sion ex­per­i­ence. Qaida-linked groups’ vis­ion of a “post-As­sad Syr­ia is one with no Chris­ti­ans in it,” Van Hol­len told Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily. “It’s an ex­trem­ist, in­tol­er­ant, fun­da­ment­al­ist Is­lam­ic state. So this is a very real factor in the whole ques­tion of U.S. sup­port for the rebels.”

Syr­ia’s bloody civil war changed Chris­ti­ans’ re­l­at­ively pro­tec­ted status un­der As­sad, a mem­ber of the minor­ity Alaw­ite sect, a Shia off­shoot. His primar­ily Sunni op­pos­i­tion largely sees Chris­ti­ans as As­sad’s al­lies. Ex­trem­ists seized the an­cient Chris­ti­an en­clave Maaloula where the lan­guage of Je­sus Christ is still spoken, killed a Cath­ol­ic priest, and two prom­in­ent Syr­i­an bish­ops were ab­duc­ted.

While Van Hol­len would sup­port giv­ing the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion a very lim­ited au­thor­iz­a­tion for the use of force in Syr­ia if needed, he is against arm­ing the rebels be­cause of the risk that ex­trem­ists, who are the best fight­ers with­in the op­pos­i­tion, could get the up­per hand in the con­flict. “I’m not con­vinced we have clearly es­tab­lished whose hands these weapons will end up in,” Van Hol­len says. “People “¦ don’t want to be dragged more deeply in­to a civil war that could res­ult in these rad­ic­al ex­trem­ist groups tak­ing over.

“Yes, As­sad must go, but you don’t achieve your goal if you re­place him with some­body as bad or worse.”

Wor­ried about the fate of their Chris­ti­an brethren in Syr­ia, a swath of Chris­ti­an or­gan­iz­a­tions have launched grass­roots lob­by­ing cam­paigns to en­cour­age mem­bers of Con­gress to op­pose any U.S. mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion — ran­ging from a strike to arm­ing rebels — for fear of ex­acer­bat­ing the volat­ile situ­ation on the ground and put­ting minor­ity groups in danger — and per­haps on the road to ex­tinc­tion. Tens of thou­sands of phone calls and let­ters have flooded Cap­it­ol Hill of­fices in re­cent weeks.

“There are no good guys in this scen­ario,” said Tony Per­kins, pres­id­ent of the con­ser­vat­ive Fam­ily Re­search Coun­cil. “Sid­ing against As­sad will only strengthen the hands of those who have dir­ect links to the at­tacks on Chris­ti­ans.” As mem­bers of Con­gress so­li­cited his group’s opin­ions on Syr­ia, Per­kins said, “we were very clear” that in­ter­ven­tion was not in Chris­ti­ans’ “best in­terest.”

Ar­meni­an Chris­ti­ans used to num­ber about 100,000 in Syr­ia; dur­ing the con­flict, their num­bers have been re­duced by half as they fled the coun­try or were tar­geted in at­tacks. Should the op­pos­i­tion come to power, the Ar­meni­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee of Amer­ica’s ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or, Aram Ham­pari­an, said, “we have no as­sur­ances “¦ they would re­spect the rights of Chris­ti­ans.” That group alone, work­ing through loc­al chapters, spurred 9,000 act­iv­ists to con­tact law­makers.

Ham­pari­an’s con­cerns ap­pear to be shared by Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., who be­lieves the dwind­ling pop­u­la­tions of Jews and Chris­ti­ans in Egypt and Ir­aq could sig­nal a sim­il­ar fate for Syr­ia’s Chris­ti­ans. “First the Sat­urday people then the Sunday people,” Wolf la­ments. He op­poses in­ter­ven­tion. “You have to be very con­cerned, or else you’re go­ing to see the Chris­ti­an com­munity emp­tied.”

Some groups are look­ing ahead. Dar­rin Mitchell, pres­id­ent and chief lob­by­ist of the Amer­ic­an Chris­ti­an Lob­by­ists As­so­ci­ation, says his group is ur­ging his mem­bers to write and call their elec­ted of­fi­cials to draft le­gis­la­tion that would ask “all Is­lam­ic gov­ern­ments, in­clud­ing a new fu­ture Is­lam­ic gov­ern­ment in Syr­ia, to pro­tect and re­spect the rights of re­li­gious minor­it­ies in­clud­ing the Chris­ti­an pop­u­la­tion in their re­spect­ive coun­tries” amid fears “that if an al-Qaida backed Is­lam­ic gov­ern­ment takes over in Syr­ia “¦ that Chris­ti­an wor­ship would be severely re­stric­ted and that Chris­ti­ans in gen­er­al would ex­per­i­ence ex­treme per­se­cu­tion.”

The fate of Syr­ia’s Chris­ti­ans, said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., res­on­ates with the Amer­ic­an people. “When you talk about how there are Chris­ti­ans on the side of As­sad, it makes people say, ‘Oh, gosh, what are we go­ing to do now?” Paul said. “I don’t think many people would ar­gue As­sad had pro­tec­ted the Chris­ti­ans.”¦ When people hear that and they also hear al-Qaida’s on the oth­er side, al-Nusra’s on the oth­er side, and the Is­lam­ic rebels are com­mit­ting at­ro­cit­ies such as be­head­ings they put on video­tape to show the world, killing priests “¦ it shows it’s not Thomas Jef­fer­son and George Wash­ing­ton versus a tyr­ant. It’s a little more messy than that.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
4 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×