Maine has a long tradition of supporting independent candidates, most recently with Sen. Angus King in 2012. But when independent candidate Eliot Cutler launches his second gubernatorial run in Maine on Tuesday, he’ll be greeted with Democratic criticisms that he’s helping hand the race to Republican Gov. Paul LePage.
“To call me a spoiler now when I got twice the votes that the Democrat got in 2010?” Cutler asks when probed about comments made about his candidacy by Democratic Governors Association chairman Peter Shumlin and other Democrats. “This is just babble. It’s meaningless babble.”
The Democratic charge against Cutler is straight-forward. Shumlin said in May: “A vote for Eliot Cutler is a vote for Paul LePage.” Early public polling suggests that the GOP governor would lose badly in a one-on-one matchup against Rep. Mike Michaud, the likely Democratic nominee. But in a three-way race like the one that allowed him to win the governorship with just 38 percent of the vote in 2010, LePage’s chances of winning a second term increase dramatically.
Cutler has his own argument to make: After starting the 2010 gubernatorial race as a virtual unknown, he lost to LePage by less than two percentage points and outpaced Democratic nominee Libby Mitchell by 17 points. That performance, coupled with Maine’s history of electing independent candidates, make him more credible contender than fringe candidate.
These two competing narratives, along with the often-controversial LePage’s uphill fight for another four years, combine to make Maine’s gubernatorial contest one of the most compelling races of the 2014 cycle. And Cutler’s candidacy, while problematic for Democrats, virtually assures a competitive race of some form or another.
Unlike in 2010, Cutler, who released a 104-page policy book last week, begins this race as a known quantity able to tap into an established network of donors. But he’ll likely face a stronger Democratic candidate than the underwhelming Mitchell. Michaud, the six-term congressman from Maine’s 2nd District, was the party’s top recruit and seems less likely to cede usual Democratic voters to an independent candidate.
But Cutler says one of the biggest problems with Democrats labeling him a spoiler is the underlying assumption that coalitions will closely mirror those from 2010. “There’s a real possibility, if not a likelihood, that during the course of this campaign many people who voted for LePage — independents, Republicans — in 2010 and who are to one degree or another dissatisfied with his performance in office are going to come to the opinion that either he shouldn’t or can’t win reelection,” Cutler said. In other words, any loss of support to Michaud could theoretically be offset by attracting disenchanted LePage voters.
Cutler also draws optimism from Maine’s history of supporting independent candidates. Prior to winning the Senate race last fall, Sen. Angus King won two terms as governor running as an independent. Since King’s first win in 1994, an independent candidate has received at least 20 percent of the vote in every Maine gubernatorial election but one. King is the only independent in that stretch to actually pull off a victory.
Cutler hopes that tendency to think beyond the two parties pays dividends for him the second time around. Asked if Michaud would make a better governor than LePage, Cutler said: “I don’t think about better. I think about best.”
What We're Following See More »
In a statement Friday, Sen. John McCain wrote, "I cannot in good conscience vote for the Graham-Cassidy proposal. I believe we could do better working together, Republicans and Democrats, and have not yet really tried. Nor could I support it without knowing how much it will cost, how it will effect insurance premiums, and how many people will be helped or hurt by it. Without a full CBO score, which won't be available by the end of the month, we won't have reliable answers to any of those questions." His "no" vote makes it much less likely Republicans will repeal and replace Obamacare by Sept. 30.
As anticipated, the Department of Education today withdrew the controversial Obama-era "Dear Colleague" letter on campus sexual assault, replacing it with new interim guidance. Most notably, the new guidance permits colleges to use a “clear and convincing” standard of evidence, rather than the preponderance of evidence standard that the 2011 letter seemed to mandate. "The new guidance also states that colleges may facilitate informal resolutions, including mediation, if all parties agree to participate in that process."
"The Trump administration will unveil more tailored restrictions on travelers from certain countries as a replacement to the controversial travel ban, according to a senior administration official. The new restrictions will vary by country. They could include a ban on travel to the United States, or new restrictions on obtaining a visa for citizens of particular countries." They are expected to be unveiled by Sunday.
In a live-streamed address from Silicon Valley, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg announced a nine-point plan that the tech giant is rolling out over coming months to respond to "efforts by nation-states and private actors to use the social media platform to influence U.S. elections." Most importantly, the company will force all advertisers to disclose what ads they're running to all audiences. “When someone buys political ads on TV or other media, they’re required by law to disclose who paid for them,” Zuckerberg said. “But you still don’t know if you’re seeing the same messages as everyone else. So we’re going to bring Facebook to an even higher standard of transparency. Not only will you have to disclose which page paid for an ad, but we will also make it so you can visit an advertiser’s page and see the ads they’re currently running to any audience on Facebook.”
As "part of a broader Trump administration order for anti-leaks training at all executive branch agencies," Environmental Protection Agency employees "are attending mandatory training sessions this week to reinforce their compliance with laws and rules against leaking classified or sensitive government information ... Relatively few EPA employees deal with classified files, but the new training also reinforces requirements to keep 'Controlled Unclassified Information' from unauthorized disclosure."