Ted Cruz to Rush Limbaugh: GOP Is ‘Defeatist’

.photo.right{display:none;} After his lengthy speech, the senator takes to Rush Limbaugh’s show to slam his colleagues.

Former Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz, center, greets supporters at a voting precinct Tuesday, July 31, 2012, in Houston. Cruz faces Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst in the Republican primary runoff election for the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate. (AP Photo/Pat Sullivan)
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Alex Seitz-Wald
Sept. 25, 2013, 9:55 a.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4468) }}

Just about an hour after end­ing his mara­thon speech on the Sen­ate floor, Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas took to Rush Limbaugh’s air­waves to slam his GOP col­leagues for not back­ing him up.

Cruz said the Sen­ate GOP Con­fer­ence is be­set by a “de­feat­ist at­ti­tude” and warned that if Limbaugh at­ten­ded a single meet­ing, he’d need years of ther­apy to deal with the trauma. Re­pub­lic­ans, he said, want a “show vote … rather than ac­tu­ally fight­ing.”

“Mike Lee and I have been at­tend­ing the meet­ings with Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors for months and asked, does any­one have a plan [to deal with Obama­care]? There’s nev­er been a plan,” he said, so he stepped in. Cruz has been try­ing to force a con­front­a­tion over a gov­ern­ment fund­ing bill, which must get passed be­fore Tues­day to avert a gov­ern­ment shut­down.

“There’s an al­li­ance between the Demo­crats … and many of the Re­pub­lic­ans who are scared of this fight,” Cruz said of the cri­ti­cism he’s sus­tained in re­cent days from with­in his own party. And los­ing on Obama­care is “hon­estly the out­come that more than a few [GOP­ers] de­sire,” he ad­ded.

Cruz re­peated his in­sist­ence that any Re­pub­lic­an who votes for clo­ture on a bill to fund the gov­ern­ment “is vot­ing to de­fend Obama­care,” and that if Re­pub­lic­ans protest oth­er­wise, they’re fool­ing the Amer­ic­an people. “A lot of Re­pub­lic­ans are go­ing to claim, no, no, no—their vote for clo­ture is in sup­port of the House vote, which is simply not the case. It’s a show vote,” he said.

Cruz read a lengthy pas­sage writ­ten by Limbaugh’s fath­er dur­ing his non-fili­buster “fili­buster” and praised the ra­dio host. The two of them agree on so much, Cruz said, be­cause they listen to “the same bosses … the Amer­ic­an people.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
2 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×