Envoy: Russia Will Not Take Syrian Chemical Arms

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Sept. 26, 2013, 8:02 a.m.

A seni­or Rus­si­an dip­lo­mat on Thursday said his na­tion would not ac­cept any Syr­i­an chem­ic­al-arms ship­ment to its ter­rit­ory un­der plans to sub­ject the weapons to in­ter­na­tion­al mon­it­or­ing and de­struc­tion, Re­u­ters re­por­ted.

“There can be no doubt — we will not do this,” Rus­si­an Deputy For­eign Min­is­ter Sergei Ry­ab­kov said. An in­ter­na­tion­al treaty pro­hib­its such trans­fers, and do­mest­ic leg­al re­stric­tions also would pre­vent the United States from im­port­ing the weapons, he ad­ded in com­ments re­por­ted by the Rus­si­an gov­ern­ment news agency RIA Nov­osti.

“We be­lieve the de­struc­tion (of chem­ic­al weapons) on Syr­i­an ter­rit­ory is the best op­tion,” he said. In­ter­fax quoted him as say­ing Rus­si­an of­fi­cials “will be ready to help in guard­ing” Syr­i­an chem­ic­al-arms fa­cil­it­ies where work is be­ing car­ried out.

Mean­while, Mo­scow and Wash­ing­ton have hammered out broad para­met­ers of a U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil res­ol­u­tion on their plan to rid the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment of its chem­ic­al-war­fare stock­pile, the Wash­ing­ton Post re­por­ted on Wed­nes­day. The draft would al­low for po­ten­tial pen­al­ties in re­sponse to any non­com­pli­ance by Dam­as­cus, but the text would not con­tain an out­right en­dorse­ment of pos­sible mil­it­ary strikes.

Mean­while, Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad re­portedly said his gov­ern­ment holds weapons more po­tent than chem­ic­al arms, Le­ban­on’s Daily Star news­pa­per re­por­ted.

“Ini­tially, we man­u­fac­tured chem­ic­al arms in the [19]80s as a de­terrent weapon to con­front Is­rael’s nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al,” the Le­banese news­pa­per al-Akh­bar on Thursday quoted him as say­ing.

“Now, they are no longer a de­terrent weapon. Today, we have more im­port­ant and more soph­ist­ic­ated weapons that can blind Is­rael in a mo­ment.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×