Nunes Vents About Lack of GOP Strategy on Shutdown

Some House Republican colleagues, or “lemmings with suicide vests,” seem lost in the search for a fix.

Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., at right.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Oct. 1, 2013, 1:43 p.m.

Phones in the of­fice of Rep. Dev­in Nunes, R-Cal­if., were ringing in­cess­antly Tues­day with weary staffers po­litely field­ing callers com­plain­ing about the gov­ern­ment shut­down, Obama­care, and a wide range of oth­er frus­tra­tions with Wash­ing­ton.

The Cali­for­nia Re­pub­lic­an made head­lines Monday for call­ing some of his Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues “lem­mings with sui­cide vests” for be­ing will­ing to shut down the gov­ern­ment over Obama­care, as re­por­ted by The Wash­ing­ton Post.

By Tues­day, Nunes made plain he was ex­as­per­ated with the situ­ation.

“It’s fun,” he said, quickly cla­ri­fy­ing, “I’m be­ing a little sar­cast­ic.”

“There’s just a lot of con­fu­sion out there,” he said of the pub­lic re­sponse. “The Re­pub­lic­an base is all for this — all for get­ting rid of Obam­care — but it’s prob­lem­at­ic be­cause there aren’t the votes to do it, so there is a little mis­un­der­stand­ing.”

“Then we’ll ob­vi­ously start hear­ing from some con­stitu­ents who need help from the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment, wheth­er it be pass­ports or get to the na­tion­al parks or what have you.”

Staffers in Nunes’s of­fice were over­heard ex­plain­ing to callers that he has re­peatedly voted against Obama­care, but that he wanted to avoid a gov­ern­ment shut­down.

“I was nev­er a big fan of this strategy,” he said. “Now we are in full im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Cruz strategy, so now I guess you have got to see it play out. How it ends — you got me.”

Nunes said he doesn’t think the con­ser­vat­ives who sup­port the ap­proach ad­voc­ated by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, ever thought it through.

“I don’t know if they ever knew how it is sup­posed to end,” he said. “I don’t think they ever thought that through all the way…. If you are go­ing to take a host­age and shut down the gov­ern­ment, you damn sure bet­ter have an en­dgame and this didn’t have that.”

Nunes said he re­mains con­cerned that the far-right fac­tion could pre­vail in fight­ing the debt ceil­ing, which is around the corner and could have neg­at­ive eco­nom­ic rami­fic­a­tions.

“You have a few folks on our side that are will­ing to do that, and you have a White House and many Demo­crats, who are root­ing for that, be­cause I think they’d love to turn around and blame Re­pub­lic­ans for the eco­nom­ic prob­lems,” he said. “It’s a dan­ger­ous con­coc­tion when you have few people here in the House who are able to wag the tail of the dog and at the same time have the lead­er­ship of this coun­try — the folks who have been elec­ted to lead in the White House — who be­hind the scenes are secretly root­ing for it.”

He em­phas­ized frus­tra­tion that the up­set in the Re­pub­lic­an Party plays to the hand of Demo­crats. “I’m not go­ing to name names, but a lot of my Demo­crat­ic friends, be­hind closed doors laugh; they are pro­mot­ing it, egging us on. We prob­ably all need a little time-out, but it is prob­ably not go­ing to hap­pen.”

Nunes said he has dubbed some of the tea-party-in­spired flank of the GOP con­fer­ence the “lem­ming caucus” be­cause they are so fo­cused on mak­ing a point that they are harm­ing the party.

“There are a few folks around here who should be run­ning for lead­er­ship when you have a lead­er­ship po­s­i­tion open…. The last two Con­gresses, they didn’t run, and then, this last gam­bit — they cre­ated this spec­tacle on the floor that was totally un­ac­cept­able,” he said.

Nunes said that dy­nam­ic is play­ing out.

“For three years straight, they don’t sup­port any­thing that the lead­er­ship does, and at the same time they don’t run for lead­er­ship. That is not lead­er­ship. Those are what I call lem­mings,” he said.

“They sneak around. They don’t pub­licly do much. They don’t run for of­fice. They sneak around, and they plot and they plan on ways to take down rules and everything that a ma­jor­ity should not be do­ing,” he said.

Nunes’s frus­tra­tion amounts to open dis­gust. “They are op­er­at­ing like a par­lia­ment­ary sys­tem, not a demo­crat­ic re­pub­lic, and if you don’t have 218 votes you don’t have any­thing. For the last three years we have had a tough time get­ting 218 votes, and they are be­ing egged on by Demo­crats, and they don’t get it. So that is why I call them lem­mings, the lem­ming caucus.”

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×