Nunes Vents About Lack of GOP Strategy on Shutdown

Some House Republican colleagues, or “lemmings with suicide vests,” seem lost in the search for a fix.

Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., at right.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Add to Briefcase
Stacy Kaper
Oct. 1, 2013, 1:43 p.m.

Phones in the of­fice of Rep. Dev­in Nunes, R-Cal­if., were ringing in­cess­antly Tues­day with weary staffers po­litely field­ing callers com­plain­ing about the gov­ern­ment shut­down, Obama­care, and a wide range of oth­er frus­tra­tions with Wash­ing­ton.

The Cali­for­nia Re­pub­lic­an made head­lines Monday for call­ing some of his Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues “lem­mings with sui­cide vests” for be­ing will­ing to shut down the gov­ern­ment over Obama­care, as re­por­ted by The Wash­ing­ton Post.

By Tues­day, Nunes made plain he was ex­as­per­ated with the situ­ation.

“It’s fun,” he said, quickly cla­ri­fy­ing, “I’m be­ing a little sar­cast­ic.”

“There’s just a lot of con­fu­sion out there,” he said of the pub­lic re­sponse. “The Re­pub­lic­an base is all for this — all for get­ting rid of Obam­care — but it’s prob­lem­at­ic be­cause there aren’t the votes to do it, so there is a little mis­un­der­stand­ing.”

“Then we’ll ob­vi­ously start hear­ing from some con­stitu­ents who need help from the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment, wheth­er it be pass­ports or get to the na­tion­al parks or what have you.”

Staffers in Nunes’s of­fice were over­heard ex­plain­ing to callers that he has re­peatedly voted against Obama­care, but that he wanted to avoid a gov­ern­ment shut­down.

“I was nev­er a big fan of this strategy,” he said. “Now we are in full im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Cruz strategy, so now I guess you have got to see it play out. How it ends — you got me.”

Nunes said he doesn’t think the con­ser­vat­ives who sup­port the ap­proach ad­voc­ated by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, ever thought it through.

“I don’t know if they ever knew how it is sup­posed to end,” he said. “I don’t think they ever thought that through all the way…. If you are go­ing to take a host­age and shut down the gov­ern­ment, you damn sure bet­ter have an en­dgame and this didn’t have that.”

Nunes said he re­mains con­cerned that the far-right fac­tion could pre­vail in fight­ing the debt ceil­ing, which is around the corner and could have neg­at­ive eco­nom­ic rami­fic­a­tions.

“You have a few folks on our side that are will­ing to do that, and you have a White House and many Demo­crats, who are root­ing for that, be­cause I think they’d love to turn around and blame Re­pub­lic­ans for the eco­nom­ic prob­lems,” he said. “It’s a dan­ger­ous con­coc­tion when you have few people here in the House who are able to wag the tail of the dog and at the same time have the lead­er­ship of this coun­try — the folks who have been elec­ted to lead in the White House — who be­hind the scenes are secretly root­ing for it.”

He em­phas­ized frus­tra­tion that the up­set in the Re­pub­lic­an Party plays to the hand of Demo­crats. “I’m not go­ing to name names, but a lot of my Demo­crat­ic friends, be­hind closed doors laugh; they are pro­mot­ing it, egging us on. We prob­ably all need a little time-out, but it is prob­ably not go­ing to hap­pen.”

Nunes said he has dubbed some of the tea-party-in­spired flank of the GOP con­fer­ence the “lem­ming caucus” be­cause they are so fo­cused on mak­ing a point that they are harm­ing the party.

“There are a few folks around here who should be run­ning for lead­er­ship when you have a lead­er­ship po­s­i­tion open…. The last two Con­gresses, they didn’t run, and then, this last gam­bit — they cre­ated this spec­tacle on the floor that was totally un­ac­cept­able,” he said.

Nunes said that dy­nam­ic is play­ing out.

“For three years straight, they don’t sup­port any­thing that the lead­er­ship does, and at the same time they don’t run for lead­er­ship. That is not lead­er­ship. Those are what I call lem­mings,” he said.

“They sneak around. They don’t pub­licly do much. They don’t run for of­fice. They sneak around, and they plot and they plan on ways to take down rules and everything that a ma­jor­ity should not be do­ing,” he said.

Nunes’s frus­tra­tion amounts to open dis­gust. “They are op­er­at­ing like a par­lia­ment­ary sys­tem, not a demo­crat­ic re­pub­lic, and if you don’t have 218 votes you don’t have any­thing. For the last three years we have had a tough time get­ting 218 votes, and they are be­ing egged on by Demo­crats, and they don’t get it. So that is why I call them lem­mings, the lem­ming caucus.”

What We're Following See More »
Bill Murray Crashes White House Briefing Room
2 hours ago

In town to receive the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor at the Kennedy Center, Bill Murray casually strolled into the White House Briefing Room this afternoon. A spokesman said he was at the executive mansion for a chat with President Obama, his fellow Chicagoan.

CFPB Decision May Reverberate to Other Agencies
6 hours ago

"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Morning Consult Poll: Clinton Decisively Won Debate
6 hours ago

"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."

Twitter Bots Dominated First Debate
7 hours ago

Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.

Center for Public Integrity to Spin Off Journalism Arm
7 hours ago

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.