How can Democrats win next year’s election fight over Obamacare? Just lean back and let Republicans work their magic.
The GOP’s unwavering demand that President Obama delay and dismantle the Affordable Care Act has been the hallmark of Republican opposition to the law since its passage in 2010, an unrelenting focus that has paved the way for the current government shutdown. But the approach has left little room for political nuance, making the party look inflexible about improving a law that is taking effect while they lament its existence.
Democratic strategists think that approach creates an opening with voters who, while skeptical of the Affordable Care Act, are far less interested in defunding it than making sure it works. So rather than fret about the political lumps they’re about to take, Democratic operatives see a chance for victory.
“The old rhetoric of ‘repeal and replace’ has been more and less exposed to be a sham,” said J.J. Balaban, a Philadelphia-based Democratic strategist. “Now it’s ‘repeal and repeal.’
“The Republicans have been so inflexible that they’ve made it harder to press their advantage on the issue,” he added. “Democrats have clearly benefitted from that.”
Such optimism seems bold, even silly, for a law whose popularity has sunk to new lows this summer. In every recent survey, more people are against it than for it, and in most cases the difference is significant. An NBC/Wall Street Journal survey last month reported only 31 percent of people favored the law ““ 44 percent didn’t. Throw in a deluge of headlines about businesses cutting their health care and blaming Obamacare ““ evidence Republicans say of the looming implementation disaster — and it’s easy to understand why GOP members say they’re giddy about re-litigating the issue in 2014.
But those aren’t the numbers or headlines Democrats are paying attention to. Rather, with the law taking effect, they think the politics have shifted from an ideological argument to one about which party is trying to make it work.
In effect, while people don’t like Obamacare, they like the Republican approach to it now even less.
Polls bolster their point. A recent survey from CBS News and the New York Times found 56 percent of Americans wanted Congress to uphold the ACA and make it work as well as possible, while only 38 percent wanted Congress to cut off funding to it. An internal survey from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee of 68 competitive House districts found similar results: 55 percent of voters there wanted to implement Obamacare effectively; only 40 percent want to repeal it outright. (The Democratic polling firm Garin-Hart-Yang Research Group conducted the survey in July.)
The public’s desire to improve the law had led Democratic leaders to urge their members to take a pragmatic approach with voters. What matters is making sure the law works as well as possible, they argue, not whether it should have been passed in the first place.
“If you go back home and re-litigate the ideological war on the Affordable Care Act, you lose,” Steve Israel, chairman of the DCCC, said recently. “If you back home and set up an Affordable Care Act implementation task force and you put people in a room and you say, ‘OK, I want to solve these difficulties one by one, and I want to be a problem solver and not an ideological warrior,’ you win.”
Winning Obamacare politics would be a first for Democrats. In 2010, the law galvanized Republicans as Democrats lost seven seats in the Senate (one in a special election, six on Election Day) and their majority in the House. Its potency faded last year, but Republicans argue, convincingly, that highlighting the law’s Medicare cuts helped them rebut Democratic charges the GOP wanted to “end Medicare as we know it.”
Some Democrats think Obamacare, after being a subject of intense debate the last two elections, won’t remain a top issue in 2014. Others figure that, at the very least, it can’t get any worse for the party.
“We already hit rock bottom in 2010 and lost everyone we were going to lose on health care, and now we’ll start winning people back,” said one Democratic strategist.
And still others contend that the Holy Grail of Obamacare politics might yet come to pass: After finally seeing the benefits of millions receiving access to health insurance, the public could suddenly support the law.
“The more people experience the Affordable Care Act and the benefits of choice of affordable health care coverage, the better,” said John Lapp, a Democratic strategist. “[It gets them] beyond the bogeyman scare tactics.”
Of course, there’s a flip side to that argument: The law’s implementation turns into a nightmare. At that point, no amount of messaging might be enough to save the party from punishment during the 2014 election. After Tuesday’s problem-filled unveiling the state-based exchange Web sites — in which many of the millions who reportedly signed up were greeted with an error message — Republicans are confident their long-held predictions of Obamacare doomsday are finally coming to pass.
“The Democrats have consistently engaged in magical thinking about Obamacare,” said Rick Wilson, a Republican strategist. “They expected political benefits from it since its passage, and they keep expecting some kind of marvelous transformative moment where people say, ‘Paying more for crappier health care? Sign me up!’ “
He added, “No large government social engineering program has ever been rolled out in the social media era, and the power of anecdotal horror stories — and there will be countless screwups — will leave a lot more Democrats than you think hiding in the tall grass.”
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."