Updated New START Data Showing Larger U.S. Stockpile Not Alarming: Experts

Rachel Oswald
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Rachel Oswald
Oct. 3, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — Nuc­le­ar-weapons ex­perts re­spon­ded to new data show­ing that in re­cent months the U.S. stra­tegic stock­pile in­creased — des­pite plans for it to de­crease un­der the 2011 New START agree­ment — with a col­lect­ive shrug.

Since the be­gin­ning of March, the United States has mar­gin­ally in­creased the num­ber of de­ployed nuc­le­ar weapons and launch­er vehicles it holds, ac­cord­ing to up­dated New START fig­ures re­leased by the U.S. State De­part­ment on Tues­day. The new com­pli­ance data shows that as of Sept. 1, Rus­sia con­tin­ued to out­pace the United States in re­du­cing the num­ber of stra­tegic arms it holds un­der the treaty.

“To me it’s no big deal, num­bers, up num­bers down,” said John Isaacs, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Coun­cil for a Liv­able World, which ad­voc­ates for re­du­cing U.S. nuc­le­ar weapons. “Every­one cer­tainly is in com­pli­ance with the treaty.”

Still, he told Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire in an in­ter­view that the new data is “evid­ence “¦ that we’re be­ing pretty lack­a­dais­ic­al on re­du­cing nuc­le­ar weapons.”

El­bridge Colby, a former U.S ne­go­ti­at­or of the New START ac­cord, also said the war­head in­crease did not alarm him.

“I cer­tainly wouldn’t read too much in­to that,” El­bridge, a prin­cip­al ana­lyst at the Cen­ter for Nav­al Ana­lyses, said in a phone in­ter­view. “I would ima­gine it would have more to do with the par­tic­u­lar­it­ies of the main­ten­ance sched­ules and de­ploy­ments.”

Colby, though, was more in­ter­ested in the in­crease in the num­ber of U.S. stra­tegic-de­liv­ery vehicles.

The month-old in­form­a­tion -- for the time peri­od March 1 to Aug. 31 — shows Rus­sia has 1,400 fielded stra­tegic nuc­le­ar weapons while the United States pos­sesses 1,688 such arms. The data re­lease shows the U.S. mil­it­ary upped its de­ployed war­head num­bers by 34 and its long-range de­liv­ery vehicles by 17 since the last time a re­quired ar­sen­al count was taken.

Hans Kristensen, who heads the Nuc­le­ar In­form­a­tion Pro­ject at the Fed­er­a­tion of Amer­ic­an Sci­ent­ists, noted in a Wed­nes­day FAS blog post that the six-month in­crease in U.S. nuc­le­ar weapons and launch­ers is likely an an­om­aly and not the res­ult of a de­lib­er­ate U.S. policy plan to build-up its ar­sen­al.

“It prob­ably re­flects fluc­tu­ations mainly in the num­ber of mis­siles on­board bal­list­ic mis­sile sub­mar­ines at the time of the count,” he wrote.

What the war­head in­crease does show is how slowly the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has been mov­ing to im­ple­ment the New START ac­cord since the treaty entered in­to force two-and-a-half years ago, Kristensen said. Wash­ing­ton “has worked on re­du­cing so-called phantom weapons that have been re­tired from the nuc­le­ar mis­sion but are still coun­ted un­der the treaty.”

Rus­sia con­tin­ues to de­ploy con­sid­er­ably few­er stra­tegic de­liv­ery vehicles than the United States. Un­der the new fig­ures, there are 473 in­ter­con­tin­ent­al-bal­list­ic mis­siles, sub­mar­ine-launched bal­list­ic mis­siles and heavy bombers held by Mo­scow com­pared to the 809 de­liv­ery vehicles kept by Wash­ing­ton.

The num­bers re­leased by the State De­part­ment this week were in ag­greg­ate form. A break­down of spe­cif­ic ICBM, SLBM and stra­tegic bomber quant­it­ies could be is­sued in the com­ing months.

The New START arms con­trol ac­cord re­quires the former Cold War en­emies to each re­duce their re­spect­ive ar­sen­als of fielded long-range nuc­le­ar weapons to 1,550 by 2018 and to lower the num­ber of de­ployed mis­siles and bombers to 700, with an ad­di­tion­al 100 de­liv­ery vehicles per­mit­ted in re­serve.

The U.S. Air Force is ex­pec­ted to lower to at least 420 the num­ber of Minute­man 3 ICBMs it main­tains on act­ive status. As of March, the ser­vice still had 449 de­ployed stra­tegic mis­siles. It is not clear when those re­duc­tions will take place or how they will be spread out among the three bases in Montana, North Dakota and Wyom­ing that host the weapons.

The ser­vice also does not know which of its B-52 stra­tegic bombers will have their nuc­le­ar mis­sion taken away, ac­cord­ing to Kristensen. The U.S. Navy is slated to be­gin re­mov­ing some SLBMs from its fleet of Ohio-class sub­mar­ines around 2015-2016.

What We're Following See More »
Morning Consult Poll: Clinton Decisively Won Debate
1 days ago

"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."

Trump Draws Laughs, Boos at Al Smith Dinner
2 days ago

After a lighthearted beginning, Donald Trump's appearance at the Al Smith charity dinner in New York "took a tough turn as the crowd repeatedly booed the GOP nominee for his sharp-edged jokes about his rival Hillary Clinton."

McMullin Leads in New Utah Poll
2 days ago

Evan McMul­lin came out on top in a Emer­son Col­lege poll of Utah with 31% of the vote. Donald Trump came in second with 27%, while Hillary Clin­ton took third with 24%. Gary John­son re­ceived 5% of the vote in the sur­vey.

Quinnipiac Has Clinton Up by 7
2 days ago

A new Quin­nipi­ac Uni­versity poll finds Hillary Clin­ton lead­ing Donald Trump by seven percentage points, 47%-40%. Trump’s “lead among men and white voters all but” van­ished from the uni­versity’s early Oc­to­ber poll. A new PPRI/Brook­ings sur­vey shows a much bigger lead, with Clinton up 51%-36%. And an IBD/TIPP poll leans the other way, showing a vir­tu­al dead heat, with Trump tak­ing 41% of the vote to Clin­ton’s 40% in a four-way match­up.

Trump: I’ll Accept the Results “If I Win”
2 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.