Warren Uses Star Power to Push Tough-on-Wall-Street Agenda

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 11: U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) questions witnesses during a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on 'Mitigating Systemic Risk Through Wall Street Reforms,' on Capitol Hill, July 11, 2013 in Washington, DC. The committee heard from the panel about the progress being made on reform provisions that improve financial stability. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Oct. 6, 2013, 7:33 a.m.

Sen. Eliza­beth War­ren giggles like a girl sought after by the coolest boy in school when asked what she makes of the pro­gress­ive push for her to “save” lib­er­als from a feared “too-close-to-Wall-Street” pres­id­en­tial run by Hil­lary Rod­ham Clin­ton in 2016.

But the “Aw shucks, me?” ven­eer shines with the pol­ish of a prac­ticed politi­cian. War­ren is im­min­ently aware of the spot­light she’s un­der and fully cog­niz­ant of the fact that the mes­sage she sends will be as thor­oughly dis­sec­ted as the Fed chair­man talk­ing about the eco­nomy.

“My job is here in the Sen­ate,” the Mas­sachu­setts Demo­crat said in an in­ter­view, wav­ing off the ques­tion, rooted to a chair in her Cap­it­ol Hill of­fice with tower­ing ceil­ings.

“I have been fight­ing for middle-class fam­il­ies for dec­ades and I have a chance here to make a dif­fer­ence and that’s what I’m try­ing to do. And that’s what I’m fo­cused on. That’s it,” she said, adding firmly, “If you need a ‘no,’ you’ve got the ‘no.’ “

In an en­vir­on­ment where little le­gis­la­tion is mov­ing on Cap­it­ol Hill, par­tic­u­larly in the fin­an­cial-ser­vices/con­sumer-pro­tec­tion arena where she made her name, War­ren is em­ploy­ing her celebrity stature and her Har­vard Law as­siduity to her be­ne­fit.

She set the tone early this year when she fam­ously blas­ted reg­u­lat­ors for treat­ing too-big-to-fail in­sti­tu­tions as “too big for tri­al” in her de­but hear­ing at the Sen­ate Bank­ing Com­mit­tee. The ex­change be­came her first of many You­Tube hits, draw­ing more than a mil­lion view­ers in less than a week and sim­ul­tan­eously hand­ing pro­gress­ive groups a jack­pot clip to build a cam­paign war chest.

War­ren is among the least seni­or mem­bers of the Bank­ing Com­mit­tee, but her words un­ques­tion­ably draw the most at­ten­tion, so she takes ad­vant­age of that by stick­ing to pet is­sues that res­on­ate well with voters and fo­cus­ing like a laser beam where she sees an op­por­tun­ity to nudge the de­bate.

“This is about us­ing the tools to be ef­fect­ive,” she said. “There are many tools in the tool­box and I want to use every one of them to help level the play­ing field for work­ing fam­il­ies.”

Al­though crit­ics on the left and right privately lament that her rabble-rous­ing per­form­ance in hear­ings ap­pears to be as much about steer­ing out­comes as it is about im­mor­tal­iz­ing her firebrand repu­ta­tion, aides on both sides of the aisle ac­know­ledge she ap­pears at least as much work­horse as show horse. She might get her five minutes of fame in sound bites at hear­ings, but she has the best at­tend­ance re­cord of any of the mem­bers, in­clud­ing the chair­man and rank­ing mem­ber, and routinely stays to the bit­ter end, long after the cam­er­as have stopped rolling.

War­ren also has the dis­tinc­tion of be­ing a rare fresh­man who is the seni­or sen­at­or from her state. She knocked off in­cum­bent Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., in Novem­ber and then, when former Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., resigned to be­come sec­ret­ary of State in Feb­ru­ary, War­ren jumped from ju­ni­or to seni­or after less than a month in the Sen­ate.

As the brainchild be­hind the cre­ation of the Con­sumer Fin­an­cial Pro­tec­tion Agency, a former lead­er of the Con­gres­sion­al Over­sight Pan­el formed in the wake of the con­tro­ver­sial $700 bil­lion fin­an­cial-in­dustry bail­out known as TARP, and a former bank­ruptcy-law pro­fess­or, she is clearly well-seasoned in fin­an­cial policy.

War­ren might not have any ob­vi­ous single-handed suc­cesses to point to since she took of­fice in Janu­ary, but she has kept steady pres­sure on the left not to go soft on rein­ing in Wall Street and has sought to hold those in power ac­count­able.

Her ef­forts are cred­ited with help­ing bring down the White House’s pur­suit of Lawrence Sum­mers for Fed­er­al Re­serve Board chair­man and ce­ment­ing Richard Cordray’s con­firm­a­tion as dir­ect­or of the Con­sumer Fin­an­cial Pro­tec­tion Bur­eau without let­ting Re­pub­lic­ans weak­en the agency’s power.

“I pushed hard on this,” she said of the CFPB, “be­cause it really mat­ters to me and I’m glad a lot of people got in­volved.”

She was a vo­cal ad­voc­ate for keep­ing stu­dent-loan in­terest rates low. She offered a bill that would tie such rates to the rates banks re­ceive when bor­row­ing from the Fed. The bill ap­peared in­ten­ded to pick a fight about why big banks re­ceive spe­cial gov­ern­ment treat­ment.

Most not­ably, however, War­ren is viewed as light­ing a fire un­der reg­u­lat­ors to de­mand meat­i­er set­tle­ments with the fin­an­cial in­dustry. She points with pride to the Se­cur­it­ies and Ex­change Com­mis­sion’s an­nounce­ment in June that it would re­quire in­sti­tu­tions to ad­mit wrong­do­ing in cer­tain set­tle­ments.

“Reg­u­lat­ors have a lot of dis­cre­tion “¦ and it’s sort of al­ways push­ing in the same way, al­ways push­ing to see the rules weak­en.”¦ It’s ne­ces­sary to make sure there is push­back against that and that’s part of what I want to do from the Bank­ing Com­mit­tee,” War­ren said.

“Those set­tle­ments only work if they are backed up by a cred­ible threat that the gov­ern­ment is will­ing and able to go to tri­al and that’s what this has done and we have seen the needle move this way.”

For now, War­ren’s voice might be her migh­ti­est tool.

“I try to talk about the things where it is pos­sible to make a dif­fer­ence. That’s what I’m fo­cused on,” she said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×