As Sun Shines on Solar Industry, Power Companies Fret

A picture shows solar panels installed on the roof of a building in Lille on September 9, 2013.
National Journal
Clare Foran
Add to Briefcase
Clare Foran
Oct. 6, 2013, 7:27 a.m.

Com­pared with the cost of fossil-fuel-gen­er­ated elec­tri­city, sol­ar power isn’t cheap. But it’s be­com­ing more af­ford­able thanks to state and fed­er­al sub­sidies and com­pet­it­ive leas­ing and fin­an­cing op­tions. Add to this the fast-drop­ping price of photo­vol­ta­ic pan­els and sol­ar is start­ing to look like an in­creas­ingly cost-ef­fect­ive op­tion for many Amer­ic­ans.

As the tech­no­logy be­comes more wide­spread, however, util­it­ies are fight­ing harder than ever to stop sol­ar in its tracks, and they see reg­u­la­tion levied through state gov­ern­ments as the way to do it.

A main reas­on why sol­ar has be­come in­creas­ingly af­ford­able and a ma­jor thorn in the side of power com­pan­ies is a policy, now in ef­fect in 43 states, called net-meter­ing. Through these sys­tems, cus­tom­ers with sol­ar pan­els can earn cred­its for sur­plus elec­tri­city gen­er­ated dur­ing the day. The cred­its are then sold back to the util­ity and used to off­set the cost of con­ven­tion­al power pro­duc­tion, which sol­ar users must still rely on when the sun is not shin­ing.

Net-meter­ing has func­tioned as a kind of sub­sidy for sol­ar power, and sol­ar ad­voc­ates want the policy to re­main in place. Util­it­ies, however, ar­gue that now that sol­ar has be­come more af­ford­able, these sub­sidies should be scaled back or elim­in­ated al­to­geth­er.

Ac­cord­ing to Richard McMa­hon, vice pres­id­ent for en­ergy sup­ply and fin­ance at the Edis­on Elec­tric In­sti­tute, a trade as­so­ci­ation rep­res­ent­ing all U.S. in­vestor-owned elec­tric com­pan­ies, util­it­ies aren’t en­tirely op­posed to net-meter­ing; they just want a change in terms.

“What we’re con­cerned with primar­ily is the rate at which the util­it­ies are ex­pec­ted to pay for the sur­plus power gen­er­ated by con­sumers us­ing sol­ar pan­els,” he told Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily. “That’s what’s known as the feed-in tar­iff, and these tar­iffs are set much high­er than at mar­ket rates. These sub­sidies were put in place when sol­ar was in its nas­cent stages but now it’s out­grown the need for them.”

In ad­di­tion to press­ing state reg­u­lat­ors to re­vise the rates at which sol­ar users sell back their elec­tri­city to util­it­ies com­pan­ies, EEI is ask­ing state le­gis­lat­ors to raise costs for sol­ar cus­tom­ers. McMa­hon says this is be­cause sol­ar cus­tom­ers aren’t pay­ing their fair share for use of the power grid.

Sol­ar ad­voc­ates, on the oth­er hand, say the sub­sidies are do­ing what they’re sup­posed to do — make sol­ar more af­ford­able — and that they need to be left un­touched.

“Earn­ing a cred­it for the elec­tri­city that feeds back in­to the grid is only fair,” said Will Craven, a spokes­man for the Al­li­ance for Sol­ar Choice, a co­ali­tion of sol­ar fin­an­cing and elec­tri­city com­pan­ies.

“Really what util­it­ies are at­tack­ing right now is the cus­tom­er’s right to use less elec­tri­city,” he said. “When sol­ar was a boutique en­ergy source that was only avail­able to the wealthy, it was something util­it­ies could tol­er­ate. But now that sol­ar costs have come down greatly, they are threatened by us be­cause we rep­res­ent really the first com­pet­i­tion they have ever had.”

So far no ma­jor reg­u­lat­ory changes im­pact­ing net-meter­ing or feed-in tar­iffs on the state level have been en­acted, but util­it­ies across the coun­try are press­ing for change. Lob­by­ing ef­forts are play­ing out in many state cap­it­als, but McMa­hon said that in the fu­ture there could be is­sues re­lat­ing to reg­u­la­tion of sol­ar power and costs borne by util­it­ies that need to be ad­dressed by the Fed­er­al En­ergy Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion.

What re­mains to be seen now is wheth­er any of the pro­posed changes will go through and how they stand to al­ter the cost equa­tion on sol­ar if they’re suc­cess­ful.

At least one sol­ar ex­pert thinks the im­pact could be dev­ast­at­ing.

“I think it could hurt it pretty badly,” said An­drea Luecke, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Sol­ar Found­a­tion, a non­profit ded­ic­ated to pro­mot­ing the ex­pan­sion of sol­ar tech­no­logy, when asked how ad­di­tion­al fees levied on cus­tom­ers us­ing sol­ar on a res­id­en­tial scale would im­pact the in­dustry. “Do I think it will kill it? In the short term, yes. We’re not yet at a point where we can com­pete without in­cent­ives or some type of sup­port. If util­it­ies win in this battle and ef­fect­ively shut­ter res­id­en­tial mar­kets, it’s go­ing to have a very dra­mat­ic ef­fect.”

Alex Brown contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
Chef Jose Andres Campaigns With Clinton
7 hours ago
White House Weighs in Against Non-Compete Contracts
8 hours ago

"The Obama administration on Tuesday called on U.S. states to ban agreements prohibiting many workers from moving to their employers’ rivals, saying it would lead to a more competitive labor market and faster wage growth. The administration said so-called non-compete agreements interfere with worker mobility and states should consider barring companies from requiring low-wage workers and other employees who are not privy to trade secrets or other special circumstances to sign them."

House Investigators Already Sharpening Their Spears for Clinton
8 hours ago

House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”

No Lobbying Clinton’s Transition Team
11 hours ago

Hillary Clinton's transition team has in place strict rules to limit the influence that lobbyists could have "in crafting the nominee’s policy agenda." The move makes it unlikely, at least for now, that Clinton would overturn Obama's executive order limiting the role that lobbyists play in government

Clinton Super PAC Enters the House Fray
13 hours ago

Priorities USA, the super PAC aligned with the Clinton campaign, which has already gotten involved in two Senate races, is now expanding into House races. The group released a 30 second spot which serves to hit Donald Trump and Iowa Rep. Rod Blum, who is in a tough race to win re-election in Iowa's first congressional district. The super PAC's expansion into House and Senate races shows a high level of confidence in Clinton's standing against Trump.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.