Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia pays no mind to the shrill, liberal media. But he will happily listen to conservative radio talk shows.
Which means that in his self-selecting media diet, the Supreme Court justice is just like the rest of us. Scalia is both a self-described conservative and someone who evidently believes that there is fervent liberal bias in two of the country’s most storied newspapers. Those views put him squarely among a group of people who pick and chose news sources that support their ideological beliefs.
Here’s the full relevant quote from Scalia’s fascinating interview with New York Magazine:
What’s your media diet? Where do you get your news?
Well, we get newspapers in the morning.
“We” meaning the justices?
No! Maureen and I.
Oh, you and your wife “¦
I usually skim them. We just get The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Times. We used to get The Washington Post, but it just “¦ went too far for me. I couldn’t handle it anymore.
What tipped you over the edge?
It was the treatment of almost any conservative issue. It was slanted and often nasty. And, you know, why should I get upset every morning? I don’t think I’m the only one. I think they lost subscriptions partly because they became so shrilly, shrilly liberal.
So no New York Times, either?
No New York Times, no Post.
And do you look at anything online?
I get most of my news, probably, driving back and forth to work, on the radio.
Sometimes NPR. But not usually.
Talk guys, usually.
Do you have a favorite?
You know who my favorite is? My good friend Bill Bennett. He’s off the air by the time I’m driving in, but I listen to him sometimes when I’m shaving. He has a wonderful talk show. It’s very thoughtful. He has good callers. I think they keep off stupid people.
John Sides, a George Washington University political science professor and blogger over at The Monkey Cage, broke down some 2010 Pew data on media consumption to piece together how people who distrust the media are more likely to have a media diet that confirms their political beliefs.
The data, in chart form:
The 2012 Pew media consumption data finds that The New York Times may fit in here as well, with a larger than average number of liberal readers and a lower than average number of conservative readers, with only very few Republicans. Conservative talk-radio hosts such as Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh have audiences dominated by Republicans and conservatives.
While Scalia’s media diet may be common for people who think like he does, it’s not particularly uplifting. No matter what you think about media bias in The Washington Post or The New York Times, they are two of the dominant sources of journalism in the world, as this (apolitical) Times story and this (apolitical) Post story from today demonstrate. And no matter what you think about Antonin Scalia, he’s pretty obviously a massively smart human being. But when some of the smarter people out there refuse to read some of the smarter journalism out there, everyone loses.
What We're Following See More »
When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage.
The House on Tuesday voted 403-12 "to pass an overhaul to the nation’s chemical safety standards for the first time in four decades. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act aims to answer years of complaints that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks the necessary authority to oversee and control the thousands of chemicals being produced and sold in the United States. It also significantly clamps down on states’ authorities, in an effort to stop a nationwide patchwork of chemical laws that industry says is difficult to deal with."
"Leaders of the Republican Party have begun internal deliberations over making fundamental changes to the way its presidential nominees are chosen, a recognition that the chaotic process that played out this year is seriously flawed and helped exacerbate tensions within the party." Among the possible changes: forbidding independent voters to cast ballots in Republican primaries, and "doubling the number of early states to eight."
Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."
Bernie Sanders "signed a letter Tuesday morning requesting a full and complete check and recanvass of the election results in Kentucky ... where he trails Hillary Clinton by less than one-half of 1 percent of the vote. The Sanders campaign said it has asked the Kentucky secretary of state to have election officials review electronic voting machines and absentee ballots from last week's primary in each of the state's 120 counties.