Republican Senator on GOP Shutdown Strategy: ‘Wow. Is That the Best You Can Do?’

Sen. Mike Johanns waits for the beginning of a news conference November 30, 2011 on Capitol Hill.
National Journal
Michael Catalini
Oct. 7, 2013, 1:51 p.m.

Sen. Mike Jo­hanns, the soft-spoken Neb­raskan, walks from the Rus­sell Build­ing along the con­crete un­der­ground path to the Cap­it­ol when he’s needed on the floor for a vote. He’s not one to get taken for a ride — not on the Sen­ate sub­way or by con­ser­vat­ive col­leagues whose strategy he views with skep­ti­cism. Jo­hanns, the former Neb­raska gov­ernor and Ag­ri­cul­ture sec­ret­ary un­der George W. Bush, has held back snip­ing at his Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues in the in­tern­al GOP de­bate over wheth­er to press Demo­crats for con­ces­sions on Obama­care in re­turn for fund­ing the gov­ern­ment.

But his po­lite man­ner has not stopped him from cri­tiquing the mer­its of the plan.

Jo­hanns de­cided earli­er this year he wouldn’t seek reelec­tion in 2014, a de­cision that means he is not glan­cing over his shoulder at at­tacks from the right or the left. That also means there’s little down­side to speak­ing his mind about what’s hap­pen­ing in Con­gress.

When the ar­chi­tects of the GOP strategy, in­clud­ing Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Mike Lee of Utah, ex­plained the path to vic­tory, Jo­hanns quickly real­ized what the rest of Wash­ing­ton soon would as well: The plan re­quires the pres­id­ent and Demo­crats to back off their sig­na­ture le­gis­la­tion. It was a non­starter.

“If that’s your strategy? Wow,” he said. “Is that the best you can do? Like I said, I didn’t get it.”

A cer­tain level of polit­ic­al prag­mat­ism could have gone a long way in this case, the think­ing goes, and Re­pub­lic­ans could have se­cured more fisc­al con­ces­sions had they steered clear of try­ing to short-cir­cuit the Af­ford­able Care Act.

“My ad­vice, when I do speak up, is think about what you’re fight­ing for and make sure the strategy you’ve chosen ac­tu­ally gets you to a res­ult. I didn’t see how this got to a res­ult. I could nev­er un­der­stand de­fund­ing Obama­care as the strategy for the con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion,” Jo­hanns said.

Part of the prob­lem with the strategy is that Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., whose Sen­ate Demo­crats have held firm, in­sists that the House vote on the up­per cham­ber’s so-called “clean” con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion.

Now, Re­pub­lic­ans in the House and Sen­ate aim to dis­cred­it Re­id by ty­ing him to the gov­ern­ment shut­down in the same way he has tried to taint the GOP. The prob­lem with that is the dif­fi­culty in pier­cing Re­id’s ar­mor. He doesn’t care about the in­sults, in oth­er words.

“I don’t think he’s es­pe­cially bothered by some­body say­ing this, that, or the oth­er thing,” Jo­hanns said. “He’s been around a lot of years and fought a lot of fights.”

The big­ger is­sue is that fo­cus­ing on Obama­care takes away from a dis­cip­lined and uni­fied fo­cus on fisc­al is­sues, such as en­for­cing the Budget Con­trol Act caps, which Demo­crats op­pose.

“We some­how got off on a cul-de-sac,” Jo­hanns said.

Jo­hanns lends his cri­ti­cism to a chor­us of oth­er Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans, in­clud­ing Sens. Bob Cork­er of Ten­ness­ee, who char­ac­ter­ized the Cruz ap­proach as the “box-canyon” strategy, and Tom Coburn of Ok­lahoma, who said he thinks the GOP will fold over the shut­down.

The path out of that canyon, to use Cork­er’s meta­phor, is easy, ac­cord­ing to the Re­pub­lic­an skep­tics in the Sen­ate. But it’s also easi­er said than done, with both the White House and Re­id’s Demo­crat­ic Caucus un­will­ing to move off their po­s­i­tions.

“I think there’s just a point where both sides have to agree that con­tinu­ing to fight has no re­deem­ing fea­tures to it, that the down­side of set­tling beats the beat­ing that you’re tak­ing,” Jo­hanns said. “I think when both sides reach that con­clu­sion, then it will be re­solved.”

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×