Janet Yellen, Meet Ted Cruz

Obama to throw his Fed nominee to a hostile Tea Party Congress.

Federal Reserve vice chair Janet Yellen speaks to a group of journalists at George Washington University on Thursday, April 4, 2013. 
National Journal
Patrick Reis
Oct. 8, 2013, 4:25 p.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama nev­er had an easy path to win­ning con­firm­a­tion for the next head of the Fed­er­al Re­serve. But he’s de­cided to make it all the more dif­fi­cult by in­tro­du­cing Janet Yel­len at a time when con­gres­sion­al ire has hit new heights — and his op­pon­ents are already tout­ing plans to make the nom­in­ee’s life dif­fi­cult.

Obama is re­portedly plan­ning to send Yel­len’s name to the Sen­ate Wed­nes­day, ask­ing the cham­ber to con­firm her as the next head of the world’s most power­ful cent­ral bank.

More than most nom­in­ees, the pick for Fed dir­ect­or has tra­di­tion­ally been the prerog­at­ive of the pres­id­ent, as sen­at­ors have been reti­cent to risk the mar­ket tur­moil that could res­ult from a pro­longed battle over the bank’s lead­er. But at a time when Re­pub­lic­ans have demon­strated their will­ing­ness to use any and all means avail­able to lever­age policy con­ces­sions, there’s no reas­on to be­lieve that that pre­ced­ent will be enough to ush­er Yel­len through an easy con­firm­a­tion.

In­deed, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has already said he’ll use the nom­in­a­tion to look for lever­age to pass le­gis­la­tion re­quir­ing a deep­er audit of the Fed­er­al Re­serve, a long-time dream of former Rep. Ron Paul, an­oth­er Re­pub­lic­an from Texas, that has be­come a main­stream goal of the mod­ern GOP.

“That gives the op­por­tun­ity to lever­age,” Cruz said this sum­mer when asked about Obama’s up­com­ing Fed nom­in­ee. “I cer­tainly hope that, work­ing to­geth­er, we could force a vote on the Audit the Fed bill.”

Yel­len’s nom­in­a­tion also comes at the nadir of re­la­tions between Re­pub­lic­ans and the Fed­er­al Re­serve. Chair­man Ben Bernanke was first picked by former Pres­id­ent George W. Bush, but his ef­forts to shock the eco­nomy in­to a stronger re­cov­ery have stretched his ties with Re­pub­lic­ans well bey­ond their break­ing point.

Con­ser­vat­ive crit­ics ar­gue Bernanke’s hy­per­act­ive bank has put the coun­try at risk of in­vest­ment bubbles and in­fla­tion shocks while provid­ing lim­ited re­turn in terms of eco­nom­ic growth. And with the rise of the Tea Party, Bernanke’s vis­its to the Hill have grown more con­ten­tious. At a Ju­ly hear­ing in the House, Bernanke begged the House Fin­an­cial Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Re­pub­lic­ans to avoid drama over the debt lim­it, only to be told by a pair of le­gis­lat­ors that he was over­step­ping his bounds.

Yel­len is now be­ing thrown in­to the middle of that de­bate, and there’s no in­dic­a­tion she plans to move the bank in a dir­ec­tion that will garner GOP ap­prov­al. Yel­len is viewed as — if any­thing — more ag­gress­ive than Bernanke in her mon­et­ary policy, and she has staunchly de­fen­ded the Fed’s ef­forts to use easy money to fight un­em­ploy­ment.

As with all nom­in­a­tion fights, the most likely out­come is that the Sen­ate will even­tu­ally con­firm Yel­len to to head the Fed, hand­ing her Bernanke’s place when his term ex­pires in 2014. But giv­en the cur­rent polit­ic­al cli­mate, her path will be neither quick nor pain­less.

Matt Berman contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×